Sean Penn’s ‘Into The Wild’
Posted: November 25, 2007 Filed under: BLOG | Tags: film, into the wild Comments OffSean Penn’s Into The Wild is a film that’s flawed by pretension, but nonetheless did speak to me, as it probably would a lot of young people who sometimes feel overwhelmed by modern life. Over the last year I have grown more and more hermitised and the idea of rejecting all of it for a great solo adventure, as Christopher McCandless did whose story the film is based on, is seductive.
It’s the same song that’s called discoverers, gypsies, hippies, twisted souls, the religious, artists and backpackers for years and years. It’s the feeling that one never truly knows oneself or true life until they are on the road, and away from everyone they know.
For the first time since I was 18 I no longer live in the city, but in Sydney’s West-Northern suburbs where you can live quietly and anonymously. After years of being saturated in Sydney nightlife, city living and the community of the local music scene, and following one year of completely embracing the noise, smells and sweat of other great cities like London and New York … I find myself drifting away.
And of course in today’s world getting away requires a virtual disconnection as well as a physical one. I rarely talk to people on the phone or even have my mobile on. I don’t have a Facebook or MySpace account. And I am completely estranged from the music scene – I don’t know, or care, or check what’s happening or who’s who. (There are some exceptions but as a whole I am far less “visible”.)
The only thing that pulls me to the city is work and friends; both of which I appreciate and are necessary but can be a source of pain to me. I still feel my soul crowded by the impurity of society; the status, the celebrity, the endless stuff, the lame desire, the fraudulence, the pain. And I find refuge in my home when the “real world” doesn’t impinge; My mother thinks nothing more than tending her garden. My brother and sister are both young and not yet damaged by greed and paranoia.
In fact a love for my family is the one outstanding thing that divides me from Christopher (or at least the film version). Love is the most beautiful thing and only truth in life. And the pure love you have for those you would sacrifice everything for, is what you must use to navigate life in the world. That love should not only be an inspiration, but a defense and medication in combating life’s travails. That love keeps you honest and true and must be used to generate love for all others.
The world is harsh but you must live in it. It is indulgent, and as with Christopher fatal, not to.
The future of television (in my opinion)
Posted: November 17, 2007 Filed under: BLOG | Tags: current tv Comments OffCurrent.com is just about my dream media site and has become daily viewing for me. To put that in perspective no other site has enlisted such loyalty from me, save perhaps The Daily Show With Jon Stewart/The Colbert Report.
Current TV is intelligent, without being intellectual. Entertaining, without being naff. Funny without being too snarky. Socially and politically engaged without being preachy. Juuust right. Plus it’s television which means I don’t have to think (the last thing I want to do after or when about to begin working a nine and a half hour day.)
I happen to be in the target demographic of Current (16-35 year olds) and like any Gen C-er (that’s what we’re called apparently) I appreciate the high degree of user interactivity/generated content. Although I still prefer their in-house television shows, like infoMania and Current TV, to the viewer created videos called VC2 pods.
And I can’t decide which presenter I like better. Straight arrow Conor Knighton or scruffy puppy dog Brett Erlich? I bet they’d both make great boyfriends.
US television crisis? ‘Quarterlife’ shines instead
Posted: November 17, 2007 Filed under: BLOG | Tags: quarterlife, television Comments OffAt first I was a little wary of the new web television show, Quarterlife. Firstly, there’s little experimentation with the format. It’s a scripted drama shot like any show you’d see on television with none of the kind of play you see with most online video channels. And each video, at around 8 minutes is overly long for a standard web video. In fact you could see it as the usual 22 minute television episode but cut into three parts.
The only thing “webby” about this is the fact that one of the characters is a video bloggers – which is a fairly superficial justification for choosing the web as your delivery platform. Is this just a television series idea that didn’t make the grade, so was dumped onto the internet wasteland? Well it did come about from a rejected television pilot, but the advantage of the web is that creators Marshall Herskovitz and Edward Zwick have been given complete creative control. They are also not affected by the current writer’s strike in the US.
Well I gave the first episode a shot and must admit … found myself clicking on the next episode. And the one after. I’m hooked enough by the various plot developments to give this baby a go. And partly because it is nice to watch characters I can very closely identify with (creative young people; careers, friendship, love) who aren’t totally slappable. I guess this is the gap Herskovitz and Zwick wanted to close, having already done thirtysomething and My So-Called Life (a short lived high school drama).
Interestingly enough it looks like the series will end up airing on television after its internet run, at least in the States.

