MONICA TAN

Archive for 2009

Why I’ve FAILed in China

In blog on December 28, 2009 at 1:11 am

A friend of mine recently declared her 2009 a “FAIL” and it’s in that spirit I would like to declare my time in China the same. A definite FAIL.

And let it be known that said FAIL cannot be attributed to any people, my university, this city or country I’m in, or even the great and mysterious universe. There is only one person responsible for my fail, and that’s me. Yup, I’m taking full responsibility.

China has been a challenge in so many respects: I’ve had to do without my family and all my best friends, live in a country and culture wildly different to my own, in a language I have yet to master, and all in a city that, to be perfectly honest, I am having difficulty falling in love with.

And how did I respond to these challenges?

In fact, I didn’t see them as challenges as all. I saw them as big, terrible drawbacks to my new life. I was harsh on new friends for not being like my old. I criticised the city to whomever would listen, and rather than laughing in the face of Beijing’s icy, below zero temperature weather, I too quickly waved the white flag, and withdrew to my room. Soon I was stewing away too many hours alone, inevitably turning my thoughts into bitter-tasting, poison.

It’s funny, the less you see of people, the harder it becomes to be around them. And the more selfish you become.

I thought I could combat my loneliness by keeping busy. But I quickly learned that blogging, Google Reader, freelance writing, gchat, Skype and watching DVDs on your laptop is no replacement for face-to-face contact. I’m sorry Internet, as wonderful as you are, you can never make the hours melt away quite like a friend.

Which is why, I’m going to wrap this up quickly with two lessons learned that I think know will turn around 2010:

It’s important to be around people. No matter how tiring that can sometimes be, the loneliness of being in the company of new, unfamiliar friends is minuscule compared to the loneliness of no company at all.

It’s not about you. To paraphrase John F. Kennedy, ask not what the world can do for you, but what together we can do for the world.

Protected: Beijing blows … blows up, that is! Start again.

In blog on December 18, 2009 at 8:05 pm

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Bubble boys and girls: Uncle is an island

In blog on December 15, 2009 at 12:23 am

“Remember, none of them have been overseas,” the teacher mentioned, in reference to the rest of the class.

We had been discussing whether Australians found it strange that despite my Unclese appearance I didn’t speak any Unclese languages, and had an Australian accent. I replied that such a thing wasn’t so uncommon in Australia, but when I traveled the locals of places like Europe and South America, which have relatively small, Unclese populations, found it a little strange.

Her comment – that none of the Unclese students had been overseas (well except for one, who was ethnically Korean and had been to Korea) – or perhaps it was mine, was yet another reminder of how I differed to the rest of the students in the class.

Let’s imagine six villages.

The five villages are all interconnected: they communicate with one another, trade and share goods, news, information, ideas, and culture. There is a movement of people between the villages: be they short visits, work related or migration. So even though in each village the majority of the population stay in their own village and never set foot in the other villages – almost all of them know someone who has.

The sixth village, however, is isolated from the rest. It has little communication or trading and sharing of ideas with the other five, and there is almost no movement of people – either in or out. In this case, not only is there an even greater majority of the population who has never seen another village – hardly any of them know anyone who has.

Now, this sixth village is very, very big. So perhaps there is enough dynamicism within the village to rival the five villages put together. The thing is, there’s also a very powerful organisation in charge of this village, that attempted to eradicate many differences between families and put into place a culture of heavy conformity. This makes the sixth village an even more remarkably different place to the five other villages.

This may be an extreme analogy for Uncle, but still, I am constantly struck anew by how “closed” Uncle was, still is – although it’s changing, and wonder what the implications are. When I talk to an Unclese, it’s not just a case of realising they’ve never been overseas, but also that they’ve grown up in a world where no one they know has been overseas either.

Remember this girl I had lunch with, and who said I was the first foreigner she’d ever met? Many other Unclese students I’ve talked to said the first foreigner they’d ever met was their language teacher. Which Sydney-sider born and raised could ever even remember meeting their first “foreigner”? Sydney is packed full of them! They’re called … Sydney-siders.

And this is just the general experience for Unclese students attending a top tier Brother university. Many of them may not have been overseas, but most of them will likely, at some point, have the opportunity to. It’s not the same story, however, for the nation’s majority countryside peasant population.

For more on how and why Uncle is an island, head to this fascinating post by Kevin Kelly (via. Strange Maps, via. John Maudlin’s Outside the Box.)

Interesting fact: here, a “migrant worker” isn’t someone who’s migrated from overseas, but someone who’s moved from one province to another, within Uncle. Imagine if you had to ask for – and it was difficult to get – permission to move from Victoria to NSW? But it makes more sense when you remember that Uncle (1.3 billion) has a greater population than all of Europe (0.5 billion), and a greater land mass (9.6 million km2, 4.3 million km2 respectively).

This new documentary ‘Last Train Home‘ looks like a fascinating and moving treatise on the migrant worker experience here:

Why Internet freedom matters, in the West, in Uncle

In blog on December 11, 2009 at 12:34 am

The bars, the colourful balloons … it’s an analogy!

For those of you out there who, like me, have been living and breathing the Internet for the past decade, we know what it represents. It’s not just another media technology – it is the one that blows all the rest out of the water, and for many, has almost become a fundamental human right. If you think the Internet is already pervasive, it has nothing on what we’re going to see in the next 5,000 days. And as the excellent documentary “RIP: A Remix Manifesto” the future direction of the digital realm is being laid out now. And we’re in real danger of losing the vibrancy, diversity and freedom that makes the Internet so incredible.

While RIP focuses on the insidious nature of corporate greed, I can assure you there’s another bad monster you have to be wary of: government control. If you want to envision a nightmare scenario of what could happen to your Internet, just look to Uncle for inspiration.

In Danwei’s fascinating video with Uncle’s blogging big guns, writers that face serious potential consequences by blogging about what they do, almost all had the same answer when asked about the biggest changes to the Internet in Uncle: this year the Party seriously tightened their control. Much of it was a response to the July 5 riots in Urumqi, plus stepping up national security for the 60th anniversary celebrations. Down went YouTube, down went Facebook and Twitter, down went everything hosted on WordPress (although that has recently been restored) and every day a few more blogs and sites were added to the banned list.

In the video, blogger Zhai Minglei says, “the control is so heavy that I would call this year Year One of Internet Control,” which doesn’t bode well for his predictions of the coming years. On the other hand, when asked in what way the internet had changed this year, blogger and grass roots philanthropist Tiger Temple had a somewhat more positive spin:

I have an answer which may sound self-contradictory. The online freedom is deteriorating due to the tightened controls. It is moving backwards. However we feel that we have more freedom to express our freedom. Why this paradox? Obviously the government has been increasing its efforts in terms of technology and control of public opinion, the environment is getting worse.

But why now we can see online discussions that we could not previously see? Some small blogs with supposedly “extreme” opinions are still around. Is it all because of regulatory negligence? No, I think it because we are now slow-boiling the frog. We used to be boiled by them, now it is the other way around. We are helping them get used to the freedom of speech. To make the Internet police feel how dumb their rules are. And we will prevail step by step.

Despite the fact that Uncle has some of the most restrictive censorship laws of the world, somewhat paradoxically (or perhaps as a consequence of) the fact is that the Internet is just as prevalent here as it is back home – if not more so!

The thing with the Unclese is that, my impression so far is, they’ve never had the kind of diverse, independent, truth-to-power media industry that a country of their size warrants. Newspapers, television networks and books have always had a tight Government controlled leash around them. So it makes sense that the Internet – a place in which broadcasting is decentralised and therefore very difficult to monitor – has become a primary source of news and information for many Unclese.

Not to mention a safer (although not completely safe) way to organise, and voice dissent than IRL (in real life).

They, particularly the young, and particularly the urban, educated, are, for the most part, Internet savvy and active participants in the online world. More and more are using proxies to “scale the Wall“, and netizens are making a serious impact on events, such as in the Deng Yujiao incident.

From Australia, it’s hard to get a sense of the depth and vibrancy of Uncle’s online sphere. Primarily it is a language barrier that creates the “insularity of the Unclese Internet” as blogger Chinayouren put it, and one that continues to frustrate me today. Nonetheless, “bridge blogs”, particularly those like chinaSMACK which even translate comments made by Unclese readers on Unclese stories, allow me to peek into that world.

When it comes to power, there are two critical components: information and organisation. The latter is self-explanatory, but the former equally vital. I’ve come to realise how much I take the Western media, with all its flaws, for granted. It is so hard to get an accurate picture of what’s going on in this country, and without which you have no idea what needs to change. You have no idea what has been taken away from you, from your neighbour, or from a community.

(It must be mentioned one gigantic flaw being that despite its more accurate reportage, the trade-off was advertising and the promotion of consumerism, so Western media is essentially complicit in consumer culture playing an unhealthy role in maintaining corporate control of our society.)

So until now, the people of Uncle had trouble getting the first, and in the face of the most organised authoritarian government in the world, had even more trouble with the second. Then along came the Internet and in a single stroke were given the potential to access both. No wonder it has the Party nervous, and why “18 of the 24 journalists imprisoned in Uncle work online“.

The Internet is here to stay, and the very future of democracy may live and die in its pipes. But your average person doesn’t know this. As an Internet obsessed person I forget most people are like my friend who today exclaimed “really?” when I informed him that even publications like the NYTimes have blogs these days. And to whom issues like net neutrality, or liberalizing copyright laws in the digital age seem trivial compared to climate change and the global financial crises etc.

But these things are important, and it’s critical that we netizens fight to preserve all the wonderful, revolutionary qualities of the Internet that we love so much: before corporate culture or scary governments distort, choke, sanitize, and eventually spiritually kill this amazing place.

Lastly, I’m going to leave you with a video poking fun of Tony Abbot, for your own local taste of netizen action:

Am I getting too old to ever reclaim my hipster identity?

In blog on December 9, 2009 at 9:32 pm

Circa 2005.

It will be of no surprise to old-time readers to hear that in the summer of 2004-2005 I was a FULL-BLOWN HIPSTER.

Back then I was just 21 years of age, and a bartender of a club that hosted, what was, Sydney’s coolest party. I had just graduated from university and was also blogging, making zines, podcasts, indie dj-ing and volunteering at a community radio station. Nothing I made was very good, but at the time, I thought I was genius and on reflection, I still believe I learned a lot.

But really, as is the case for most scenesters, what I really lived to do was party. I partied while I worked (dancing behind the bar), and partied harder when I wasn’t. I was friends with other scenesters, and at every party we went to, we’d bump into other scenesters that we’d have short, trivial conversations with. We were always surrounded by musos, DJs, fashion designers, artists, models, who wore amazing clothes, took loads of drugs, and looked amazing on the dancefloor.

My hipster lifestyle kept chugging along when I relocated to London for a year, but when I returned to Sydney I found that things had changed. Whether it was me or the parties, the scene just didn’t seem quite so cool anymore. Then, six months later I started working my first proper job in the media industry – for a very, mainstream tabloid title – and my hipster lifestyle quickly began to fade away.

At some point I woke up and realised, without any intention, my hipster days were well and truly over.

And for the most part, I’m fine with that. The things I’m doing here in Brother: my Motherin language classes, learning about Uncle, blog strategy work for a non-profit, freelance writing, it’s extremely interesting, creative, inspiring, meaningful and intellectually challenging. This is my “thing”, something I’d never really found in the world of hipsterism.

But every now and then, I do miss that time in my life.

Today, in the midst of memorising han zi, I decided to play on my iPod one of the old mixes from the DJs of that party I used to bartend at. I lost myself a little in nostalgia. I recalled the nervy thrill of the hours leading up to the party starting – because you knew what was about to come would be totally out of control. And then the room would fill with all those crazy, gorgeous creatures, out would come the drink, the drugs, the mob ecstasy of just being in a room filled with other crazy, gorgeous creatures.

I remembered all the heart-breakingly beautiful boys my friends and I had nicknames for and that we’d “see around” but never really knew (although I pashed a couple). I recalled, with some embarrassment, how cool I’d feel when I schmoozed with the scene’s micro-celebrities. And fondly, best of all, thought of the heightened sense of closeness I’d experience with my friends (they were my crew!) And the way the music, music, music would always possess us – ah yes, I miss all this.

Perhaps, as this post points out, we were “always trying so hard”. While there was something primal and essential about how present we were, dancing, flirting, drinking, drugs, making out – a lot of this was also performance. Every participant came knowing the deal. You dressed a certain way, you had certain values, lived a certain lifestyle, acknowledged a certain social ranking, and most of all, you acted a certain way in the club. There was an understanding – we’re here to go crazy – and that’s as much a responsibility as it was a privilege.

As “legitimate” as my life is now, there will always be a part of me that will yearn for those outrageous, glamorous days as a scenester (and I know why). However, Brother provides little outlet to satisfy those desires and by the time I get out of this city, – with its oppressive grey skies, and its 12 million clock-punching Unclese – my youth will have passed with barely a wisp of fading smoke to remember it by.

And, alas, once one’s 20s have gone – they are IRRETRIEVABLE!

Uncle in the Western media, an exercise in dissonance

In blog on December 9, 2009 at 12:38 am

This morning I returned to Uncle, for a look at Postcolonial criticism, and again it struck me, how strange to be learning about this from within the East, in contrast to when I came across this subject in my Australian university degree. And this topic is always of interest to me, because I’m never quite sure where I fit. The oppressive colonizer? (But look at me, I’m Asian!) The oppressed colonized? (But listen to me, I’m a Westerner!)

We discussed the way “Orientalism” was less the “East” and more an imagination of the “East” in the minds of the “West”, and I wondered out loud, if similar things weren’t going on today. There only ever seems to be a handful of storylines about Uncle that pop in the Western media (internet censorship, human rights record, economic rise) and in my short three months here I can assure there are plenty of other, very compelling things to look at in this country. (Have a look at this discussion to look at what is possibly driving the “Western media bias”.)

Perhaps, again, our representation of Uncle says just as much about us, or our relationship to them, as it does about them.

Similarly, it’s interesting to look at an “Eastern” response when a certain, handsome young writer grants an interview with a famous, Western publication. (Or, more accurately, that link is to a Western response to an Eastern response to an Eastern writer being portrayed by a Western title … confused yet?)

What are we looking at here? Subtle racism? Cultural misunderstandings? And from which side? Was Han Han really pandering to the West by granting this interview – and a West that refuses to even try to understand the East? Or aren’t these golden opportunities to show a different side to Uncle – something every country should be attempting to do, in the spirit of internationalism, rather than in support of some kind of ongoing Western hegemony?

These questions aren’t going away anytime soon and constantly pop up, because let’s face it, words matter. Just take a look at the PRC’s quick dumping of the catchy phrase “China’s peaceful rise” in 2004 when, alarmingly, the Western media came to emphasise the ‘rise’ part, much more than the ‘peaceful’ side.

Now the Party are having to put out global ad campaigns in order to downplay fears about Uncle’s dominance on the world stage. Particularly during a time when Western capitalists countries are in a time of identity crises, leading to articles like these, and movies like this.

Lastly, do you think I should dump the code words, and just call a spade a spade?

A long pinky nail on a man means what to you

In blog on December 6, 2009 at 7:19 pm

I was invited as a guest to a fancy banquet dinner, and when it came to this course, I ate everything around the wobbling, black sea cucumber, which looked none too appetizing. The Unclese guest next to me gently urged me to eat it – telling me that what I’d (none-too-subtly) left behind was very expensive. With a touch of embarrassment – after all this is like scraping the caviar off the cracker, and just eating the cracker – I ate it, and it wasn’t too bad!

“This topic is becoming very hot,” said my student.

“Mmm, it’s probably better to say, ‘this topic is becoming very popular.’” I corrected.

No doubt he had learned that in informal speech, you could replace the word “popular” with “hot.” But in this case, it sounded strange. And how to explain that while “this topic is becoming very hot” sounded odd, “this is becoming a very hot topic” didn’t? There’s no rhyme or reason – it’s just a feeling one acquires. After many hours, years – a lifetime – of being immersed in English.

And I know, that for the reverse, the same is happening for me. I shoot out words and phrases in Unclese that are total stabs in the dark. Even when I’m grammatically correct, perhaps – completely unbeknown to me – my choice of words sound strange, or evokes a feeling that’s different to what I intended. And the sucky thing is, there’s no way of getting the hang of it except through years of immersion.

And that’s just the language. What about everything else?

Let’s take something small: some Unclese men like to grow the nail of their little pinky long. As someone who’s grown up in a culture where this is uncommon, there’s something jarring, and not very attractive when I see this. I associate long, nicely shaped nails with women, and then the fact there is only one nail on the hand like this – well that’s just confusing.

But for an Unclese, I’m certain they don’t have the same response. For them doing this, and the sight of it, means something else. And even if I was told what that something else is*, I can’t internalise it straight away. I still feel an instinctive sense of dislike, that can only be eroded by years of immersion, when my brain acclimatizes and begins seeing things the way they see things.

And that’s just something small. What about bigger things, like customs, love, family, work, politics, art, big events like the 60th anniversary celebrations? There are a multitude of subtle cues, signifiers, indicators working together that you can only read, on a subconscious level, after being wholly familiar with a culture as a whole. A knowledge of Unclese history plays into understanding the modern day workplace. A knowledge of traditional customs plays into understanding politics. A knowledge of the education system plays into understanding why a certain tragedy happened.

And right now, in terms of understanding these things, I’m 26 years behind an Unclese person.

As one of my favourite “foreigner-in-Uncle” bloggers Uln of Chinayouren writes in his post on why Unclese is the world’s most difficult language:

Anyone living in China long enough realizes how aware Chinese are of their long history and their status as a different civilization. This discourse is irritating for Westerners, because it reminds too much of ultra-nationalistic creeds back home. But it has one essential difference with those creeds: in the case of China, it is true. As we said before, China is justified to see itself as a cradle of civilization, and it is the only such culture that has survived practically independent from World mainstream till modern times. This cultural awareness is the main reason for the preservation of the language as we know it, surviving different regimes and even periods of chaos.

When we study Chinese we are not merely learning another language, we are learning the words of a parallel World, the last independent system of vocabulary and writing that humanity still has. It is the most similar experience available on Earth to learning the language of another planet. If Chinese is really so hard to learn, this should provide enough motivation for anyone to try it.

I came here, foolishly believing I could learn Unclese in one year. Within the space of two weeks, I wrote to my father saying that one year would most definitely turn into two. And now, three months later, I can see that after two years, I will have only a basic grasp of the language. Many more years will be required to be anywhere near a native speaker. And a lifetime would be required to have any hope of truly understanding this place – and I’m not sure if I have a lifetime to give.

And yet, I am not discouraged. From neither trying, nor documenting the process in this blog. That’s the thing about blogs – they stand less for imperative truth, and more for subjective storytelling. Again, I turn to Uln’s about page to eloquently summarise why I’m here, and why I write:

Thousands of foreigners live in China today, and a fair part of them seek to extend their contracts and are in no hurry to leave. There are different reasons for us to stay, from the old dream of the billion customers to the patient, tolerant nature of the locals. But there is one reason that all of us share to some extent: That vague feeling that it matters, that it’s here and now that history of humanity is being written.

Hence the blog’s subtitle: Of China changing the World

I have been in China for over 2 years, enough to understand that I will never really understand this country. But enough also to be completely fascinated by her. I want to give my own point of view of what is going on in China today. It will not be the voice of the expert but I hope I can make it an original, thought-provoking and entertaining read for all who come into my blog.

* The internet, as always has all the answers. The most common answer seems to be that it’s a “status symbol” indicating the wearer doesn’t do manual labour.

我要YouTube!我要facebook!

In blog on December 6, 2009 at 2:21 pm

Credit: James Cui

This great clip from my Unclese/American friend James, aka VJ Fader, a visual artist based in Los Angeles, who says:

Here is a 30 second web video protesting the Great Firewall of China, for blocking Youtube, Facebook and many other media sites from the Chinese people.

这是一个30秒的网影视抗议中国伟大防火墙,阻拦了Youtube、Facebook、和许多其他媒介站点从中国人民。 请寄发给您的朋友。

Ever noticed the way all Unclese students wear glasses?

In blog on December 1, 2009 at 12:47 am

Yesterday an Unclese family was kind enough to take me out for Peking duck. Their son is studying at an Australian university and translated parts of the conversation for me which had turned to Sydney selective schools. The family likened them to the top schools in Brother: not the best because they were filled with the brightest students in the city – just the students who worked the hardest. “And many of those Sydney selective schools are populated by Asian students,” I pointed out.

I expected the family to be proud of that indefatigable Unclese work ethic, but in fact, they too recognised that the insane amount of hours Unclese students study was getting out of hand. I was a little surprised – I’d always thought that even though we foreigners thought it crazy that these university, high, even primary school kids filled every waking hour with study*, for them isn’t it normal?

And it is normal – in that it’s what everyone is doing – but many here are starting to realise it’s normal bad kind of normal.

I brought up this topic with my Unclese student today (I’m tutoring him in English). He nodded vigorously in agreement. I asked him if it was a case of “race to the bottom” – that is, if you know that the only way to get a good job is to be the top of your class, all you can hope to do is work that extra bit harder than everyone else. Only problem is every single other student has the same idea, so they all start trying to work that extra bit harder. Which means now you have to give even more “extra work”, which everyone else is doing now too, and so you have to give a bit more and so on and so on until everyone is doing, no joke, 14 hour days.

“And the teachers tell us this,” he said disapprovingly, “that we have to be the best if we want to get anywhere. So all we become obsessed with defeating one another! That’s all we want to do, beat each other.”

And the pressure was getting to them, with concern about the mental health of these kids. Yesterday at lunch the family discussed the sad and pressing issue of suicide among overseas Unclese students (or even worse), who not only have to contend with pressures related to academia, but all the other stresses related to being in a vastly different country to your own.

The Unclese family used an illustrative anecdote: ever noticed that Western children carry their own bags? Whereas here in Uncle, parents carry the bags for their children. Their son studying in Australia – a really cool 21-year-old dude, engaging, friendly – put it to me like this: “Unclese kids spend their whole childhood studying, and in the closed world of their family. They don’t know anything about the world. And then suddenly they’re in Australia where they’re meant to be independent. Not just because they’re away from their family, but also because Australia is a very different culture where young people are much more independent anyway.”

And from what I’ve so far gathered, young, Unclese students, particularly those under 20, are more inexperienced and less assertive than their Western counterparts. (Although by the mid-to-late 20s it all seems to even out.)

I cautiously asked him if he thought being more independent was a good thing. He replied, “yes! Definitely. I wanted to be more like that, which is why I went on exchange to Germany in high school. And man, was that a learning experience. I could barely even speak English then, let alone German! And there wasn’t anyone there who could speak Unclese, so every second I was having to work out words with my German host family,” he said with a laugh, stabbing an imaginary dictionary with his finger.

Perhaps it’s no accident that the story of my last post, should come out of Uncle.

Of course the imperative question, are things changing? Firstly, are things worse now? Or is this simply one of those idiosyncratic cultural characteristics?

“It’s getting worse,” my student confirmed. “My parents are of the generation of the Cultural Revolution, so they didn’t even study! But now, all we do is study and the number of hours is escalating (actually I taught him the word “escalating”, lulz.) Before you worked hard in high school to get into a good university. But now to get into a good university you have to get into a good high school. And now they’re even beginning to take notice of what primary school you go to!”

And most hilariously he added, “and haven’t you noticed that all Unclese students wear glasses?” Funnily enough I had noticed just that at the last Unclese class I gatecrashed. “It’s because all we do is study! It’s a national tragedy,” he added, shaking his head.

And is this really of any benefit to the nation? Aren’t you simply creating a generation of exhausted, frazzled robots with brains full of data, but not a single thought? Doesn’t a truly great nation need workers who don’t just work hard, or know a lot of stuff but are also creative, innovative, worldly, confident and most importantly mentally sound? They’re the attributes you sacrifice when your kids are buried in books, working themselves to the bone.

But yes, as always, I have faith! The 80s generation are feeling burnt out. Writers like Han Han, icons of the new Unclese gen, are out there, criticising the education system. Yes, when you live in a country with a one-party system political activism may seem impossible, but in fact, I think it just takes forms different to our own. And these kids have one very vital trump card that previous generations in this country never did. It’s called the INTERNET, heard of it?

But that’s a post for another day!

*And a friend tells me that in one province of Uncle, the children go to school every day of the month, with only two days off.

A lonely and desperate exposure in Uncle

In blog on November 29, 2009 at 2:56 am

The students had always found this teacher to be intelligent, and thoughtful. He never censored them, and was interested in their opinions. They respected him, and thought him a good teacher.

On Thursday, he came and asked them, “can we just talk?” And so they put the syllabus aside and talked, about philosophy, culture, politics. The big stuff. But there were hints that all was not OK. He divulged embarrassing personal details: he was 30, still lived with his parents, didn’t have a girlfriend.

The next day he came to class, and started the same. He spoke of Nietzsche, Confucious, the Sino-Japanese war, liberty, equality, freedom, the past, the future – but these students weren’t at a level of Unclese where they could fully understand him. But still he spoke, he rambled, on and on. One of the French students described it as, “mettre son âme à nu” – literally, “undress his soul”.

And then, in the midst of this undressing of the soul, he undressed his body as well. For fifteen minutes, in front of a shocked, horrified class, he stood, talked, completely naked.

When this true and scandalous story rippled through the university that day, eventually reaching me in the afternoon, it saddened me greatly, and has haunted me ever since. How desperately lonely he must be. How shocking this act, how incredible, but also how human.

Isn’t that what we all want? For people, for someone to know we exist. Know that I am here. See me for what I really am.

And is this blog not a similar kind of sad, self-exposure?

Only days earlier I read this disconcerting story, of a lonely and isolated Unclese student in Sydney who went mad and stabbed a cabbie to death. There is madness in the air. Do we all stand teetering on the edge? What does it take for someone to so suddenly slip and find themselves falling?

I worry about what prolonged loneliness may do to me.

I met a guy at a party and thought him tall and attractive. I liked how deliberately he talked. He had a masculine presence, and when I talked to him I felt like he was really all there, a full person, giving me his careful, clear and undivided attention. And there was something intriguing about him, he didn’t seem like the rest. And I was certain he too was curious about me.

Then I felt a huge, angry sock in my stomach. No!

Why do I do this? Why do I over romanticise like this? Why do I see magic in a moment that has none? There was no special connection, this isn’t the beginning of a story, of which I am a protagonist. I and he are not interesting, sexy or worthy of writing about. There is nothing and no one in this. We are just two strangers sharing the same space. We are all alone together, not touching.

I blame novels. I blame movies, music and art. But most of all, I blame novels.

I am on the verge of finishing Jean-Paul Satre’s The Age of Reason, and I blame him. Life, and the people in it, will somehow never be as alive as the invented reality of that novel. Because in that fictional existence, every single element has a purpose. Every single thing serves a higher meaning, something concrete and purposeful – the beauty of the narrative.

But in my narrative – that is life – there is no point. Things are just there, for no reason, and they don’t give a fuck about me, and any need for something real, and deliberate.

When this guy saw me, he probably saw an empty body, and felt nothing. When I saw him, there was nothing beyond my projected desire for authenticity, meaning, connection, love, respect, friendship, – and a narrative that has some sort of point, some bracketed subtext where I could say “the reason why this happened is because …, and how extraordinary and worthy it was.”

Instead of being here, like a ghost. All of us living in suspended states, revolving door strangers, together alone, not touching.

I am not in Uncle. Not really.

In blog on November 29, 2009 at 2:45 am

“Wo bu zai zhong guo!” (“I am not in Uncle!”) I cried.

My laoshi (teacher) was confused, and thought perhaps I hadn’t expressed myself properly. “Ni zai nar?” (“Where are you?”) she asked.

“Wo zai wai guo ren di fang.” (“I am in the foreign people’s place.”) I replied, gumly.

And it’s true. I’m not in Uncle – not really. I am in this absurd Westerners’ bubble. I study and socialise only with foreigners, in foreigner populated places. I hardly ever speak Motherin. I have no idea what is happening in Uncle because I can’t read their news sites, and I’m not talking in a meaningful way to any Unclese on a regular basis.

Here I am, living and breathing in this bizarre parallel universe, and there are all these things happening here, so many things for me to learn about this place – and I am like a blind, deaf and mute woman in their midst.

There is only two hours a week that I am actually in Uncle, and that is when I gatecrash the zhong guo xue sheng (Unclese students’) class. As I step into that room on a Tuesday morning, the effect is immediately transformative. It’s like crossing a national boundary: I enter a space that is inhabited by Unclese, for the Unclese, the Unclese being themselves.

Yes the class is in English, but they are all Unclese. The tutor is Unclese. The material is prepared for Unclese students. They discuss things among each other, as Unclese. Sure, when I speak up I’m like a foreign spice added to the mix, but most of the time I am just a fly on the wall.

Why am I here? I discussed this with an Australian friend, who, in agreement with my sentiment, commented, “if I was here to just have fun, there are better cities to do that. Brother isn’t a very fun city.”

And it’s true. The nightlife and creative scene has nothing on London, New York, Berlin, even Sydney. The weather sucks. The city is monstrously big, and just cannot compare when it comes to the chilled out, happy-good-times lifestyle of home. Not to mention, most importantly, it has none of the people I care about the most in this world (although don’t get me wrong, potentially some of my new friends here will prove to be lifelong buddies.)

So why am I here? I’m here to be in Uncle. To really be in Uncle. Because I am interested in the people, the culture, and this nation’s future – that will, in many ways, become the future of humanity. And because there is a good chance that I will become so interested, I will want to become a part of what is “going on” here.

Well then, what to do? It’s time I entered Uncle – for real this time, and at least for most of the week. I’m going to start off with the language. From Monday to Thursday, only speak in Unclese. And next semester I want to move out of university dorms and into a share apartment with Unclese – one of whom should speak no English. And I want to meet up with more language partners, and just generally be making more of an effort to speak, speak, speak, connect, bathe, drown in Uncle.

Move over Kanye, meet Han Han (my new Unclese lover)

In blog on November 25, 2009 at 11:25 pm

I’m in love.

His name is 韩寒, or Han Han. He’s a young, Unclese novelist, blogger and, and, AND, A RACECAR DRIVER. That triple threat just made by brain explode all over the keyboard.

Oh and I almost forgot to mention, he looks like this:

Credit: Sina and Sina.

This all started when, yesterday, I asked the class about young, Unclese artists and writers today. Were their works political? Did they examine themes like class struggle?

The tutor answered that writers today covered a broader range of topics: gender, sexuality, and ethnic minorities (by that she was referring to this nation’s ethnic minorities, of which there are 55. But they’re greatly outnumbered by the 91% of the nation who fall into the Han group – of which I belong to.)

The class brought up two, exciting young writers, of the “post 80s generation” (the generation born after 1980, which is when the Unclese government began to strictly enforce the one-child policy.) Their stories were very “alternative” and highly relevant to the Unclese youth. Neither had gone to university, and one had even dropped out of high school. The tutor commented it was interesting that these writers, poster children of the new gen of Unclese, had always operated “out of the system”.

The next day, and reflecting on these two writers thought to myself, boy they sound sexy! I kicked myself for not having written down their names, so jumped on the internet and emailed my friend from the class about them. She wrote back,

The two youth writers we were talking about are 韩寒 (Han Han) and 郭敬明 (Guo Jingming), both of whom belong to the post-80s generation writers. Han Han is more realistic and thought-provoking (he is also an awsome F1 driver) while Guo Jingming is more dreamy and commercial. You may find them an interesting comparison.

Credit: EastSouthWestNorth

I quickly Googled Han Han. Hot, I knew it! I found him on Wikipedia, and by the end of the page, was, am, desperately in love. (I’m going to pause here before this post descends into a rabble of Twi-fan proportion OMG HE’S SOOOOO HAAAWWWWT WE ARE TOTES MEANT TO BE TOGETHER etc. etc. So let me just say that if you read the Wikipedia entry, it’s like God made an imprint of everything my subconscious had been looking for in a soulmate. - OK that was a bit much.)

I was bursting to tell someone. I grabbed my Unclese friend on gchat and “announced” that I was in love. I asked if she knew of my lover, and of course she did, he’s quite famous here, saying “he’s pretty rebellious and has written many articles critizing the government and stuff.”

But I wondered how out of the system he really was. I found this article from the New York Times that focuses on Guo Jingming, but also mentions Han Han:

Guo is the most successful of a dozen young celebrity authors who make up the “post-’80s” generation, some others of whom have also achieved book sales in the millions. This group includes the high school dropout and professional car racer Han Han, 25, who derides China’s inefficient educational system in his novels and regularly insults older, more established artists on his blog, and Zhang Yueran, 26, whose novel “Daffodils Took Carp and Went Away” features a bulimic girl who falls in love with her stepfather, is mistreated by her mother and is sent off to boarding school.

While the Chinese government frequently jails dissident writers or forces them into exile, it mostly ignores the antics of Guo and the other post-’80s writers. For all their flamboyance, they exemplify the social ideals of the new China — commercialism and individualism — said Lydia Liu, a professor of Chinese and comparative literature at Columbia University. They “don’t pose any threat,” Liu said. “They collaborate.”

Without being able to read Unclese, it’s hard for me to comment. In any case, I have something new to motivate me when it comes to my language studies: I want to be able to read Han Han’s blog. I may even say that the next time I get answered the stock standard expat question: “why did you decide to learn Unclese?”

- “So that I’m able to read Han Han’s blog. …DUH.”

More interesting posts, about the interesting Han Han:

  • a breath of fresh air – 破釜Sink the Boats沉舟
  • Han Han and the post-80s – chinayouren, who also has responded to Liu’s claim that Han Han is politically nonthreatening.
  • Han Han Talks Back To TIME – EastSouthWestNorth
  • A capitalist pig in the reddest country on earth? Not quite!

    In blog on November 25, 2009 at 1:35 am

    The last slide of the presentation – and done tongue-in-cheek!

    “So, did you find this week’s readings difficult?” I asked the Unclese student. Today we were looking at Marxist literary criticism.

    “Not really,” she replied, with a grin. “I mean we’ve been learning about Marxism since we were in school, so we’re really familiar with all this.”

    I nodded, but inwardly felt a prickle. Three years ago I was in New York, and gatecrashed my flatmate’s tutorial (yes, I’m an old hand at this!) which too was about this very subject. But back then I was in a country very similar to my own. And in that class Marxism felt like someone else’s ideology. It belonged to people of the past, or people of another world.

    But now I was in that world.

    In this topsy-turvy parallel universe, not only was communism not banished to the history books, 60 years later the party who brought it to the people are still in charge of the biggest nation in the world. And unlike America where socialism is a fringe movement, and used as a dirty word to tar an opponent (as we saw in Obama’s run) – here the socialist party is not just a major party – it’s the ONLY party.

    And as someone from Australia – probably one of those greedy, selfish, exploitative capitalists, infected with dangerous ideas of individuality and civil liberties – wasn’t I currently sitting in enemy territory?

    Of course, of course, this turned out to hardly be the case. Real life never draws lines that clear cut.

    The student presentation ran through the ideas behind Marxist literary criticism (one of the central concepts being economic determinism), and in the discussion the class spoke about its application, popularity and decline here in Uncle.

    Yes, decline. It’s been 33 years since the Cultural Revolution and the beginning of the economic reforms that began opening this country up. And so this country is hardly a colour-by-numbers version of the communist utopia Marx would have originally envisioned.

    The class began discussing if “class struggle” was still a relevant topic in Uncle today. After all, the implementation of communism was meant to completely eliminate the class system. But with a widening gap between rich and poor in this country, clearly this was not the case. Even if groups were given different names now, such as “the private sector” or the “rural-urban divide.”

    I asked the tutor, yes there are more people well off in Uncle than before, but are the poorer actually becoming even more poor?

    She explained, “now there are some who are rich, and many who are poor. Before we were all poor together!” We laughed at this grim tale.

    “So, I guess it’s still a good thing, right? I mean at least some people are better off?”

    A student jumped in, “the Party says, let some get rich, and they’ll be able to help the rest.”

    The tutor added, “the problem is when these class divides become entrenched. I have no problem that there’s a second generation of rich people in this country, but it’s of concern that there is a second, and even third generation of still-poor. At least before we were all in this together.”

    I nodded. I was familiar with the growing tension between the country’s majority peasant population, and the increasingly upwardly mobile, educated urban dwellers. I asked, “and how does the Party fit this into their picture of socialist ideology?”

    “You have to remember we’re not really pure socialist anymore.” She paused, then perked up and grinned – (I really dig this lady) – “it’s the Unclese model!” She’d brought out the familiar term (“socialism with Unclese characteristics“) that the Party today used to explain their strange blend of free-market economies with socialist twists.

    But it’s getting late, I’ll continue this tomorrow …

    In Brother, I hardly ever get eye-sex

    In blog on November 22, 2009 at 12:36 am

    Au Revoir Simone playing at Yugong Yishan last night.

    I know it seems like an insanely trivial drawback, but you’d be surprised at what a difference it makes.

    For the uninitiated, eye-sex is the act of seeing someone hot and looking at them somewhat lustfully, and to one’s delight find that the look is returned. (When it’s not returned, I call it “eye-rape”.) It can happen in a split second, but you know when it’s there. And it’s AWESOME.

    For the single girl or boy, especially ones like me for whom hookups (even just kissing) are few and far between (I’m talking YEARS), eye-sex is a very necessary part of one’s life. I mean geez, I’m not asking for much, right? I’m not asking for love, for a boyfriend, for any real action of any kind. Just the occasional “damn, you’re fine!” look from someone I reciprocally feel that towards.

    Those looks really don’t mean much. Except for maybe one or two occasions, they’ve never gone anywhere. And they’re not meant to. They’re just a cheeky and quick, unspoken exchange between two strangers. And for me it adds a sprinkle of magic to my day. Even though I’m single, the city becomes enveloped with the perfume of potential romance.

    There are some cities that have provided a higher frequency of “eye-sex” than others: cities such as London, New York and Barcelona (at a minimum, daily). While others, such as Sydney, the rate was much lower. But no major city has provided such a dismal rate as Brother.

    Of course, the critical question is, which is it? No good-looking boys? Or are the good-looking boys not interested in me?

    Firstly, I have to refer to my friend Rachel who described our distinct brand of “sex appeal” perfectly:

    9:23 PM Rachel: you know, I was thinking today when I did my grocery shopping
    it’s kind of like websites, or magazines
    ridiculously hot people, in the best possible way, are kind of like ninemsn
    9:24 PM they have a broad appeal – most people will find something they like, and a few will find nothing
    I’m more of a niche website like… I don’t know – Jezebel
    9:25 PM Rachel: not everyone will like me, but the people that do are far more likely to be the people I want to like me than if I was ninemsn
    it’s filtered down
    me: lulz! that’s great and so true

    So perhaps it’s not so surprising that some of my favourite cities are also the ones I’ve received the most eye-sex in. After all, the kind of guys I like, and that like me, have, like me, been drawn to live in these dynamic, creative, lively and romantic world cities.

    Although Brother may very well turn into such a city, at the moment it is not. At the moment, one does not move to Brother to find the world’s top, innovative, coolest, most cutting edge, most interesting companies, communities, scenes or what have you. And so it follows, at the moment the city is not populated by such people. It is still, very much, a city of a developing world. And in which the majority of the inhabitants work very hard, living almost desperate lives, with little time for frivolities like “creativity”.

    So, on both hands, I neither see many guys I’m into, nor are many guys into me. In fact, to the Unclese male population, I’m probably this big (I’m big for Unclese girls), weirdly dressed, must-be-foreign, Unclese girl. And nothing much more.

    So yeah, it’s kind of hard to carry the magic when everyday you head out into the biting cold weather, look up at the grey sky, and know that for the next 1.5 years you’re probably not going to even get any eye-sex, let alone something a little deeper than that.

    If you’re wondering, exactly, what is the rate for Brother I can tell you. In the 3 months since I arrived I’ve had only two real incidents of eye sex. And they both happened last night!

    Two friends and I went to a gig featuring New York band Au Revoir Simone (to get specific, they hail from hipster/indie central Williamsburg, Brooklyn – of course). There were a lot of Americans in the crowd, and it wouldn’t surprise me if the two Unclese guys I had quick, flirtacious eye-sex (or it was more innocent than that, perhaps eye-kissing, or eye-hands-holding) – turned out to be ABCs (American born Unclese).

    Perhaps the only times I will get any eye-sex are when I go to things that are in some way connected to the cities I love.

    After Au Revoir Simone a strange German guy sang electro songs as a giant, blown-up silver penis bobbled up and down next to him.

    Why gay people carry the burden of Uncle’s one-child policy

    In blog on November 18, 2009 at 12:39 am

    I gatecrashed another Unclese lecture today, this time about queer/lesbian theory. I was surprised to find that even in that class, of mature, thoughtful, generally female post-grad students, who no doubt have more liberal attitudes than your average Unclese – well even they were very unaccustomed to and felt uncomfortable with gay people/ culture/ rights – with gayness in general.

    I tried to forgive them for this, and remember that this country is back by about 30 or so years when it comes to the acceptance of homosexuality. (I believe it was only de-illegalised a few years ago. There are no laws to protect homosexuals from discrimination.)

    I think they were a little shocked by my ‘liberal’ attitudes towards homosexuality, plus sexual orientation and gender identities. As I said to them, I come from one of the most multicultural cities in the world, where women have the same rights as men, and has one of the biggest homosexual communities in the world. A homosexual community that isn’t just “tolerated” but is, on the whole, celebrated and has and continues to influence the wider city culture in a big way.

    My city is dynamic, open, with lots of different ideas, cultures, subcultures, ways of life, and looking at the world, mixing altogether. And for me, my identity roles: as a woman, as a Chinese Australian, as a (generally) straight person, as a professional, as a hipsterllectual, as someone participating in online communities that know no physical borders, and many others – these are very unstable, mutating, complicated, sometimes indistinct from their so-called binary opposite.

    Whereas my initial impressions from Uncle has been that it is a country coming out of a very long period of having been closed. Compared to Australia, there is little multiculturalism (you are clearly classified as either a mainland Unclese born and bred local, or a foreigner) and very traditional identity roles, which are only slowly being chipped away at. Here, it’s very clear that if you’re born with a certain body (male/ female) what you’re meant to do. And so long as you do it, you’ll be fine.

    (Too bad if you feel inclinations otherwise.)

    I thought perhaps I was being too harsh, but then the tutor leader, also the dean of the department, spoke up. She said when she spent some time studying in Australia, she found the experience to be extremely disorientating, because it seemed like nothing was fixed. It was a challenge, and in some respects began to question herself.

    An interesting Uncle-specific gay issue was passed onto me by my gay Spanish friend here. He told me of his gay, Unclese housemate, who at 30 was at the receiving end of increasing pressure from his parents to marry. In truth, he didn’t mind being with women, but marriage was out of the question because it’d mean he’d have to stop having sex with men! Like most gay and lesbian people in this country, he hadn’t come out to his parents.

    And he, like almost all the young urban-born Unclese, was an only child. Which meant there was an even greater pressure on him to marry, procreate, and thereby continue the family line.

    The land that brought you fake goods, brings you …

    In blog on November 18, 2009 at 12:20 am

    Fascinating to see the difference in how the NYTimes treated Obama’s recent town hall meeting with Sisterinese students, compared to the way Uncle Daily reported the event.

    From the NYTimes:

    The meeting came the day after Mr. Obama tried to hold a frank and public discussion with Chinese students in Shanghai. The event was called a town hall, but Mr. Obama’s meeting with about 500 students had little in common with the sometimes raucous exchanges that have become a fixture of American politics.

    It was, instead, an example of Chinese stagecraft. Most of those who attended the event at the Museum of Science and Technology turned out to be members of the Communist Youth League, an official organization that grooms obedient students for future leadership posts.

    Some Chinese bloggers whom the White House had tried to invite were barred from attending. Even then, the Chinese government took no chances, declining to broadcast the event live to a national audience — or even mention it on the main evening newscast of state-run China Central Television.

    The scripted interaction underscored the obstacles Mr. Obama faces as he tries to manage the American relationship with an authoritarian China, whose wealth and clout have surged as its economy has weathered the global downturn far better than the United States’ or Europe’s.

    From Uncle Daily:

    Barack Obama was in typical eloquent form Monday for a signature “town hall meeting” with a difference.

    While the relaxed style and well-constructed answers were characteristic of the United States president, the fact that he was speaking to around 500 elite Chinese students, possibly the leaders of tomorrow, made the 75-minute session in Shanghai an impressive occasion.

    The meeting was heralded as one of the most important events on Obama’s weeklong trip to Asia.

    The president fielded eight questions – half from audience members and half from among those submitted over the Internet – during the casual and free-spirited event. Students smiled and applauded politely when Obama answered questions and chuckled appreciatively when he tried speaking Chinese.

    The NYTimes aren’t kidding about “Unclese stagecraft.” A couple of weeks ago, the government commanded all the universities to make an upcoming graduation ceremonies for foreign students a big deal. It was going to be filmed by CCTV and everything.

    So in a matter of a week, a big budget show was whipped up, seemingly fabricated out of thin air. The morning of the ceremony came, and all the performers got on stage, donned their impressive outfits, and sang and danced their hearts out. Did it matter that the whole thing was obviously done to backing tape? Including the singing?

    Nope, the officials clapped. The film cameras captured their 15 seconds of news footage. Everyone was happy.

    The foreign students “sing” to a recording of themselves. Some teachers had explicitly forbidden any overseas Chinese, Koreans and Japanese students from participating – despite the fact that they make up the majority of the foreign student population – because they didn’t look “foreign” enough.

    Similar comments were made about last month’s 60th anniversary. There was a noticeable lack of participation from regular Unclese citizens. The only people lucky enough to witness the parade and show were party officials and VIP guests. The rest of the country had to watch it on television.

    And so it was designed, as a made-for-television event.

    Now the Western media may cast this as another expression of the Party’s iron-fisted control over this nation, but I can’t help but wonder if this is also just a cultural oddity, related to the Unclese obsession with face. Perhaps the Unclese, not just the Party, would rather events happen hitch-free, and to plan, even if it means sacrificing a kind of authenticity in the process.

    Uncle can make, but can it CREATE?

    In blog on November 17, 2009 at 1:30 am

    “From the moment I saw you, I knew you were a foreigner,” the Unclese girl said.

    “What?! How? I mean I’m 100% ethnically Unclese. All four of my grandparents are from Uncle. I mean sure, I don’t look like I’m from here, but I definitely look Southern Unclese,” I spluttered, laughing, incredulous. “You must have heard me speaking!”

    “No you weren’t saying anything, but as soon as I saw you I knew you were hua yi” (sp? means “overseas born Unclese”), she continued. She eyed me for a second over the dinner table. “It must be the way you’re dressed.”

    To make my point I stood up and waved from head-to-toe. “Everything I’m wearing I bought here!” I had blue boots on, black tights, a long, chocolate brown cardigan and a ruffly, navy scarf.

    “Mmm, then it must be your haircut and your makeup.”

    “I got this here too! And I’m not wearing any makeup!!”

    But somehow she knew, and she hasn’t been the first to say that despite the fact that I am obviously Unclese, for some reason I am also obviously foreign as well.

    Talking about this to some fellow Unclese Australian friends of mine, one explained, “there’s something about how we put our outfit together.” (And I happen to love both these girls’ style, and yes, there’s something “Sydney” about both.)

    “Wait, wait, wait. So all I would have to do is style an Unclese girl here, and I could make her look foreign?” I asked, doubtfully.

    “Exactly.”

    It’s a great analogy for this interesting (possibly a beat-up, but made sense to me at the time) July article from Newsweek that commented on the fact that Uncle may be “famous as the factory to the world” – but they still lag behind when it comes to creating brand. The issue featured this provocative cover:

    So far it seems clear to me Uncle has no lack of energy, resources, or capital to assume the role of this world’s top dog. But it’s yet to bring the equally critical creativity, innovation and ideas.

    Protected: Grieving a spent youth without love (singleness: my illness, or disability?)

    In blog on November 14, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


    Where have all the revolutionaries gone? A former student speaks!

    In blog on November 14, 2009 at 2:39 am

    It just takes one day of snow fall to transform my university into a winter wonderland!

    Out of all the lectures I’ve gatecrashed, none has topped my friend’s “Unclese Foreign Policy” classes, at another university. In an effort to protect the Unclese lecturer’s identity, I’m not going to post any photos. It may be over pre-cautious of me, but he did tell us things like when he writes a book, he is a lot more careful about criticizing the Party than when he’s talking in class.

    And to a class of mainly Western foreigners mind you. I have a feeling his lecture on the same subject, but to Unclese students, is somewhat tweaked. For example today he was telling us the amusing story (he has many) of Uncle during the 70s I think*, who at the time were refusing to partake in any UN peacekeeping operations. Their attitude was one of wanting to fly under the radar – be seen as neither supporting nor condemning other nations.

    So during this time, when the UN Council would vote on peacekeeping operations, the Unclese member would … the lecturer mimed looking all of sudden very occupied with something in another direction. Or all of a sudden he would need to go to the toilet very badly. OK so I’m not sure if this is exactly what happened (although knowing the pettiness of politics it wouldn’t surprise me), but it was pretty hilarious.

    And the point was made clear, this was a very awkward turtle time for Uncle. They perpetually abstained from voting on these operations, and did not finance or send troops for any of them.

    In the 80s, Uncle suddenly decided that it really should be pulling its weight in these matters, and out of the blue gave a $4.4 billion payment to the UN peacekeeping sector. The amount totaled exactly what they should have been giving in the last decade – but unable/ unwilling to admit that they had done wrong – Uncle called it a sort of emergency gift for the peacekeeping sector which they claimed was desperately underfunded.

    The lecturer confessed he did not really cover this (or quite in the same way) in his version of this lecture for the Unclese students. It’s humiliating for an Unclese person to have to hear this.

    You got to give this lecturer kudos for being so frank in this class. Today a student asked him if, in the next 50 years, the Party would give up one-party rule. “I hope so!” he replied. But he had little faith in the youth of today, which he saw as politically apathetic. You should have seen the students of my generation!, he cried, we were very political! We wanted a revolution!

    And this dude has cred. He was part of the weeks of student protesting leading up to the 1989 ‘That Shape’ massacre. Back then he was committed to modernizing Uncle’s political system and was about to start a PhD on such a topic. But after the tragedy he became jaded, and decided that it was hopeless. From then he changed his life’s work to Unclese foreign policy.

    So when this guy speaks, you listen. And according to him, the youth of today have no faith in politics, or patience for revolution. The country has seen too many uprisings squashed by the mighty hand of the ruling Party. “You talk to a Unclese student and you know what they say? ‘Dirty politics’ and they want nothing to do with it.” I offered, “they just want to make money.” “Exactly,” he agreed.

    He went on to highlight an interesting difference in the way the West and the Unclese look at the idea of “human rights”. For a country like America, an individual’s political rights are more important than anything else. For example, the right to freedom of speech, to vote, and protest against your government. This is what human rights mean.

    But for Uncle human rights mean the right to live without hunger, to live in a safe community, the right to clean water, education, sanitation etc. Which is why we have such a stark contrast in what we consider “morally sound”. Uncle believe that by improving the lives of the people they are bestowing “human rights” – but all the West can see are the individual political rights that were taken away.

    Personally, I can’t help but believe (or should I say hope that) these “higher tier” rights will be honoured once the lower tier ones are achieved. Although such an act will require a rising Unclese middle class who, once economically powered, can afford to start sticking their neck out for the underdog, and demanding the kinds of freedoms we in the West are accustomed to having.

    As for a democracy? A multi-party system? Maybe, although from here now, in the belly of the dragon, it’s hard to imagine. I mean these guys still control so much. They even control the weather! For example before special events (e.g. The Olympics, 60th Anniversary) they shoot up special chemicals in the air to make it rain so that on the day it’s a blue-sky day.

    We had our first day of snow on November 1, which according to a local was Party induced, and is occasionally done when the pollution gets too much, so they flush out the sky. It’d be kind of funny (fitting with a total caricature of an overbearing Big Brother communist government – they’re really like GOD!!!!), if it wasn’t so freaky.

    *I will get back to you about exact dates when one of the students emails me the powerpoint presentation. Lulz, I’m like a real student!

    I <3 White Chicks that <3 Asian Dudes

    In blog on November 13, 2009 at 1:27 am

    A few weeks ago a friend tipped me off about John Safran’s ‘Race Relations’, currently airing in Australia. From here in Brother I managed to watch the first two eps via torrents, and noted that all three of the multi-racial couples featuring in the opening credits are made up of an “ethnic” girl, and a “white” guy (the first girl being Middle Eastern, the second Indian and the third some sort of South East Asian.)

    Now perhaps this is because it’s John Safran’s show, and as a white (Jewish) Australian male he wants to make clear that it is from this POV the show will be coming from. Still it bothered me – would multiracial couples where the GIRL was white and the guy ethnic have no representation on this show? Or is this exclusion just a result of such a thing being so wholly uncommon?

    Here in Uncle, it’s much easier to find white boys who have yellow fever (a penchant for Asians) than white girls with the same. And frankly, it bothers me.

    Wait, Monica. What, exactly bothers you? White boys having yellow fever?

    No, that doesn’t bother me. It used to. I used to think that white boys who have a thing for Asian girls are like that because they have this gross idea of Asian girls being docile and subservient girlfriends, and also wild and slutty in bed. And while this may be the case for some dudes, I’ve realised that on the whole a lot of the white guys I know with yellow fever are actually pretty cool. It just so happens that for some inexplicable reason they’re more attracted to Asians than any other race. And the relationships they end up having with these Asian girls are wholly legitimate.

    Maybe sometimes you just find a certain race hot. You’re just attracted to that look. (Not me, remember I am colour blind – or should that be multi-colour-dextrous – when it comes to lust.)

    So no, I don’t mind when white boys have yellow fever. What bothers me is the lack of white girls with the same.

    Now there’s already been a lot written on this topic (please leave any links in comments) so I don’t want to go into it. Instead I want to here, now, celebrate

    WHITE CHICKS INTO ASIAN DUDES.

    Recently I met a really cool, young, hot Aussie girl with a mainlander Unclese boyfriend. I almost couldn’t believe it. Then there was the super cute and sexy French girl nursing a big crush on her Korean classmate. And then there’s also this video sent to me recently. (Do watch at least the opening credits, which will surely make you LOL.)

    Called “Sexy Beijing TV” the show’s host, Sufei is a witty, Jewish American girl with a penchant for Unclese guys. A nice mirror to John Safran; a witty, Jewish Australian guy with a penchant for Eurasian girls.

    I don’t know what it is about seeing a multi-racial couple, where the guy is “ethnic” rather than vice versa, that makes me feel so happy. The cultural theorist would say it’s because when it comes to the ethnic-white dynamic, the “ethnic” is seen as the subservient/ inferior and therefore “female” role, while the “white” is seen as the dominant/ superior and therefore “male” role. So when there’s a couple that mixes it up ethnic/male-white/female that’s going to naturally appeal to the feminist, stereotype smashing element of my personality.

    But I think that explanation may over-simplify things. Perhaps I’m also disturbed by the idea that if most of the interracial couples are white guys with ethnic girls – and so hardly any white girls dating ethnic guys – that can only mean there’s a surplus of single, ethnic guys. And I’m not comfortable with the possibility that our world considers white guys on the whole to be more attractive than guys from all the other races of this planet.

    (Of course, we also need to take into account that for women things like power and social status play a bigger part of our attraction to a guy, and we live in a world where white guys have a disproportionate amount of that – but yes, like I said, I don’t want to get into this!)

    In any case, it cheers my heart to see these couples. Almost to the point that I’m kind of annoyed I can never be in one! But there’s hope for me yet …

    Hey John, how about featuring a couple that has a Chinese girl with a Middle Eastern/ Black/ Indian guy? That would blow people’s minds!

    Breaking out of the foreigner bubble

    In blog on November 12, 2009 at 2:11 am

    Totally unrelated, but thought I’d share with you my crazy dog slippers, and my ridiculous duck PJs which I bought because one of my favourite phrases is “Brother Kao Ya!” – aka, the city’s famous roasted Peking duck!”

    Following on from the last post, after class I got talking to a couple of the Unclese students, and went along to dinner with them. They were very cool, totally chill.

    As post-graduate students they were a bit closer in age to me than your average student here in Beiwai. (It’s become more and more evident to me that there is a difference between me, at 26, and people at 20 and 21.) When I told them the story of the Unclese girl I met who, at 21, still considered herself a child, they were a little incredulous. They also explained that though they had an 11pm curfew, for some buildings you could still come in later, knock on the door, and someone would let you in.

    One of the girls and I shared in common an ongoing lack of boys in our life – including here at Beiwai which, as a humanities university, has a distinct gender imbalance. (I’d say there’s, at a minimum, 10 Unclese girls to 1 Unclese boy ratio, although this is not so much with the foreign student population.) Laughing, they shared with me the reputation Beiwai boys have. They fall into three categories: kind of girly, male chauvisnist pigs in a sad effort to dispel the possibility of being mistaken for someone in the first category, and then guys inbetween the two.

    Saying goodbye, I promised to gatecrash their Tuesday lecture, which was going to be about gay/ queer identity politics, or something like that. Exactly my kind of thing!

    Alone, I headed to what I thought was going to be an aerobics class at the gym. Somehow I’d mixed up the dates however, and it turned out to be a belly dancing class! Well, why not? The incredibly gorgeous female Unclese instructor only spoke in Unclese, and all the other students were Unclese. Following the class I talked with the admin guys, and struggling with a mix of my bad Unclese and their excellent miming (star-jumps to indicate “aerobics!”) I managed to sort out the schedule. On the way home, I stopped by a street stall seller, and tried to enquire about different colours for a pair of tights on offer. It was awesome to employ phrases I’d learned in class only hours earlier.

    Reflecting back on the day, I felt kind of satisfied that I’d hit the right balance between “foreigner” life and really being in Uncle.

    As I’ve probably mentioned, it’s just so easy to live in a foreign-student bubble. Where you speak Unclese in class (although even there, socially the dominant language is English, and explanations are given in English), but outside of class you’re constantly speaking English because you only socialise with other foreign students. And even when you have to speak Unclese to a waiter or a shop keeper, when things get too tricky you too often turn to a fellow student with superior Unclese to translate.

    And anyway, such superficial interactions can’t be considered really getting to know the Unclese people. Unlike the first couple of months, this last month has definitely provided a lot more opportunities for me to have some decent conversations with Unclese people – with many of these opportunities created only because I decided to do something a little out of the ordinary (such as my poster, or gatecrashing their lectures.)

    While I can’t say I’ve gotten along with every single Unclese person I’ve met (naturally), some have been really cool, and each and every has definitely been, and continues to be an enlightening experience. I think already I’m beginning to realise my understanding of Unclese young people was a shallow caricature (I guess initial impressions always are), and slowly I’m developing a more sophisticated overview.

    And the more Unclese I learn, the more I can embed myself into Unclese life. Perhaps one day I’ll have some Unclese friends. Perhaps I’ll live with Unclese flatmates. Perhaps I’ll have Unclese workmates. And then the pièce de résistance … an Unclese boyfriend! Only then, and it’ll take time, can I claim to have an understanding of this place and their people.

    PS. Must learn to write shorter posts.

    A living, breathing Aussie youf in an Unclese classroom

    In blog on November 12, 2009 at 1:51 am

    As planned, today I gatecrashed a guest lecture from an Australian sociologist doing a series on “Australian Young Adults” – being delivered to about 7 or 8 Unclese students who major in “Australian Studies”. Today focused on the way more and more young adults in Australia are still living at home with their parents, and the tension that arises when a desire for autonomy and privacy, meets the reality of living in someone else’s house, and having to abide by someone else’s rules.

    There wasn’t much that was new for me – after all I’m a living example of this. But if you are interested, just click on the images below to view some of the powerpoint slides:

    What was more interesting for me was the second half of the class, which turned into a discussion. We gathered around, with the lecturer opening up by introducing me. I talked briefly about my own experiences as a young adult and the tensions I’ve had with asserting a sense of independence and “adultness” while living under my mum’s roof.

    A student asked us if Australian young adults experienced a sort of identity crises while going through this transition period. The ensuing discussion led me to an opportunity to put forward one of my theories:

    People in the West have a strong sense of self. It’s like, who am I? What am I meant to do with my life? What’s so special about me, and what do I offer this world? I want to be famous, I want to be rich, I want to be a somebody, I want to leave a legacy. What’s my personal destiny? What’s my individual purpose?

    And the thing about someone from the West is that they’re all too often paralysed by choice. Without (m)any social mores forcing them to pick one over the other. So this results in a sort of neuroses, and yes, an identity crises.

    Whereas in my conversations with young Unclese students – tallying up to about 8 or 9 now – it seems like they all just want to get “good jobs.” And ‘good’ is synonymous with ‘well paid and stable’. It almost didn’t seem to matter what the job was – so long as it was ‘good’.

    And same with life in general. Take, for example, a mother in Australia. It’s not uncommon for her to feel some kind of pressure to be a career woman as well – to have a life beyond her roles as a mother, to have interests beyond the home. Whereas in Uncle, which is a far more conservative country, identities are based in tradition – simple and fixed – and the majority of people adopted them without question.

    When I put this to the students, one spoke up, offering a different picture. She said that at the moment she was definitely going through a time of confusion about what she should do with her life. Should she work as a translator for an international company, or work for the government? Or perhaps as a freelancer? What would be best?

    But still I felt there was a difference. An Unclese student here completed their degree and then applied for a job that naturally followed on from that degree – with the only question they seemingly had to pose to themselves being do I work for an international company? Or the government? And then once they do land that job, that’s it. They’re set.

    But a student in Australia might not even get a job that directly relates to their degree. They might consider taking some time off and go overseas. They might change companies, roles or even industries multiple times over their lifetimes. And for them, it’s not just about finding a well paid, stable job. It’s about pursuing what you’re really passionate about. What you love. One didn’t just work, one had to find MEANING in one’s work.

    The lecturer added that yes, in our world it’s not about getting the best job, it’s about getting the best job FOR ME. Best suited to my personality. And in work, it’s not just about what can I do for the company. It’s about what can the company do FOR ME.

    Such is the luxuries of living in developed world!

    I put forward another conception I had of Unclese culture: that the children were very obedient to their parents. And that their parents exercised a high degree of control over their children. So in terms of career, the children did as the parents desired, and there was a very narrow set of ‘respectable’ career choices that one should aim for.

    This was certainly something that was more evident to me in the Unclese families I knew in Australia, compared to the Caucasian Australian families. And as an illustration I told the story of a Unclese Australian friend who had long felt the burden of her parents’ expectations – the pressure of which had inspired her to complete five years of medicine … before she worked up the courage to pursue the field that she really wanted: in acting.

    Again, there was some disagreement among the Unclese students. One piping up, that her father didn’t really know what the job market was like, so was happy for her to make her own decision as to what job was best.

    I wondered out loud, perhaps my understanding of Unclese culture via the migrant experience in Australia was not indicative of Unclese culture as a whole. After all, maybe Unclese migrants were different – in that they sacrificed a crazy amount, experiencing a lot of difficulties in moving to a new country, often with the end goal of offering their kids the kinds of opportunities they never had – or at least not without a lot of struggle – in mind.

    So naturally these hard-working, ambitious Unclese migrants are going to exert a certain kind of pressure on their kids. Was your average mainlander just relieved when their kids manage to acquire any kind of stable, well paid job? Rather than be the big shot lawyer/ doctor/ accountant that Unclese parents in Australia/ Britain/ America all want for their kids?

    All in all, it was absolutely fascinating to be given the chance to put to the test some of my initial impressions of the Unclese youth. And hopefully for them to meet one of these Australians they’ve been studying so hard about!

    Gatecrashing Brother’s ‘Australian Studies’ classes

    In blog on November 11, 2009 at 2:37 am

    Gatecrashing other people’s lectures is quickly becoming a regular habit of mine. As much as I love learning Unclese (no, really) I still need the kind of brain food that you can’t get from endless memorising of han zi (Unclese characters), or running through dialogues describing mingtian’s tianqi (tomorrow’s weather.) And I’m not going to pass up this golden opportunity to peek into Uncle’s university education system.

    A couple of weeks ago I happen to meet a Unclese student majoring in Australian Studies, lulz! So of course I asked if I could gatecrash, and this morning turned up to a class that introduced six Unclese students to Australia’s colonial past. The Unclese lecturer, and who must be mentioned had all but flawless English, had no problem with me sitting in, and introduced me to the others as an Australian, “who might hopefully be able to share some of her experiences with this topic.”

    “Well I can’t say I was there in person,” I joked.

    But much of the content was familiar to me from primary and early high school years of history: the transportation of Britain’s convict population to their Southern outpost, and then the gradual burgeoning of an independent nation. I relived the horror I felt as a 12 year old, hearing the tales of mass deaths at sea, the cruel floggings (she even had a picture of what a live one looks like) and hangings, and the generally harsh conditions those early Australians lived in.

    It was surreal to be hearing these familiar tales … but now in a neon-lit classroom of Beijing, with six other Unclese girls – none of whom had never stepped foot in Australia, but were busy taking notes on “Port Arthur” and “Governor Phillip” in the margins of their textbooks.

    Of course it wasn’t all doom and gloom. As the lecturer pointed out, life was hard for all poor people back then, even in Britain. And when along came pardons, tickets-of-leaves, and emancipation, Australian became a place for some to start anew. She pointed out that out in the harsh outback, people learned to rely on one another, and from this a strong cultural value emerged: mateship, and equality. That is, judging people by their actions, rather than their social status.

    The Unclese students, though somewhat more reserved than Australian students, also asked some thoughtful questions, and I was impressed at their level of English. The lecturer had delivered the whole seminar in English, and there were more than a few sophisticated turns of phrases.

    Very quickly, because it’s late, one thing that was definitely new to me, and I can’t believe I’d never known of, was the story of Mary Reibey. She’s the face on the 20 dollar bill – and is one impressive lady.

    Tomorrow I’m gatecrashing the lecture on “Australian Youth” (double lulz!)

    Women & Children: the 11pm curfew for Unclese students

    In blog on November 10, 2009 at 12:51 am

    “Don’t you get angry?” I asked over lunch with the Unclese girl who had responded to my poster. She lived in a dorm room that strictly enforced an 11pm curfew – every night of the week. “I mean you’re 21, they shouldn’t be treating you like a child, and telling you when to go bed.”

    “Oh but they do treat us like children, and …” she replied, “I think we are still children!”

    I looked at her thoughtfully, and paused before speaking. I considered the fact that I was talking to a girl who, in all likelihood, had never had sex, had never been so much as tipsy, and had never gone to a nightclub or a music festival. She, like most Unclese students didn’t really party, or drink, have crazy one-night pashes, or dance like a spastic till ridiculous hours of the morning.

    For an Unclese student, socialising on the weekend means shopping with friends, outings to parks and nature reserves, and most importantly eating together (dinner often at 6pm or earlier). It’s a weekend reminiscent of me at 13. On a special occasion there might be karaoke (non-alcoholic drinking.)

    But a typical weekend was more than likely to be occupied by one thing: study. And lots of it. The infamous Unclese work ethic can be no more evident than in the Unclese university student, who, 7 days a week, every waking hour, works him or herself to the bone. Desperate for one of the country’s highly sought after and none-to-common “good jobs” – in either an international company, or even better the government (“more stable” they all say) – each student attempts to outdo one another with tireless work.

    I bit my lip and asked gently, “are you scared of the outside world?”

    “Yes!” she replied, emphatically.

    “Well you shouldn’t be!” I replied, equally enthusiastically.

    Now, let me contrast this with another Unclese student, who too has an 11pm curfew. I met her at a Couchsurfing event in my first few weeks here in Brother. And when she told me of the curfew, I spluttered in disbelief.

    “But what do you do?! I mean sometimes we don’t go out until 11pm!”

    “Well we stay at the club, till about 3am. Then we go to McDonalds and have a snooze till about 6am, by which time the dorm opens again so we can go back,” she replied with a sigh.

    I laughed – I liked her way of thinking.

    “Oh my god, you should totally hold a protest over this!” I said, half-ironically, half-serious.

    “Trust me, we’ve written all sorts of letters arguing why this is wrong, but they don’t care,” she replied, resignedly.

    This girl belongs to a new breed. A new breed of Unclese students who use gmail and proxies to access (the blocked) Facebook, shop at H&M, watch Gossip Girl, and yes, go to clubs. She is not the only one I’ve met, and I wonder what it is that separates them from the more typical student.

    I am at a Korean BBQ restaurant with a mix of Unclese and Australian students. The Unclese girl opposite me is very pretty, slim, and hip. She is doing her masters in international relations and knows how to speak Arabic. I ask her if she finds going out in Brother expensive.

    To give you an illustration of the insane prices of the clubs here:

    2.5 kuai ($0.4 Aussie) = price of a big bottle of Tsinghua beer on the street
    30 kuai ($5 Aussie) = price of a small bottle of Tsinghua beer in the club

    Another illustration:

    1400 kuai ($230 Aussie) / month = amount a foreign scholarship student receives for living allowance. And all of us consider this amount “impossible” to live on, and must supplement it with a job or savings.
    800 kuai ($130 Aussie) / month = amount a Unclese scholarship student receives for living allowance. And they still manage to SAVE some of this.

    But back to the pretty Unclese student. I’m asking her if she finds the clubs in Brother expensive, as I can only assume these more “international”* Unclese students must be rich, or somewhat well-off.

    “Well there are always ladies nights,” she replies with a twinkle in her eyes. “Free entry, and free drinks!”

    *As I’ve written previously, I do not consider them to be more “Western”, but more “International”. This is what globalisation (not cultural colonisation) looks like. It’s what happens to the people of a country which was previously closed from the rest of the world – both politically and economically isolated – but now is opening up. At least, so goes my still half-baked theory.

    Halloween 2009 in Brother

    In blog on November 6, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    So my evening’s pride and joy were these glasses I bought, and then covered the glass in foil:

    Only problem was I couldn’t see out of them. So I’d put them on for about 5 seconds, and then take them off and just hold them, or hang them on my collar – over and over again. Until, of course, I lost them.

    For 20 kuai (about $3.5 Aussie), my friend and I had our hair done.

    Our hairdresser totally nailed the “Chinese princess from the future” and “pirate” concepts. I think my friend’s costume idea was a stroke of genius, because Brotheringers tend to speak with a lot of “rrrrrrrrs”, and sound like pirates.

    This is what the whole thing totaled:

    Some of the amazing costumes from the night:

    At about 3.30am we came out of the warehouse party only to find it snowing like mad. Pretty special!

    The next day I woke up to see my uni covered in a layer of snow:

    And just a flashback to 2008, where instead of dressing up as a “serial killer” I went as a “KILLER CEREAL!!”

    October in pics [slideshow party!]

    In blog on October 29, 2009 at 1:47 am

    It’s coming close to the two month mark here in Brother, so I thought I’d bring you some of my favourite pictures from my time here:

    For my birthday we blew up loads of balloons in my teeny tiny dorm room. They make a pretty rad prop for photos.

    I own a fake Louis Vuitton bag! Now I’m really Unclese.

    At the Happy Valley Amusement Park.

    Fairy floss – another awesome prop.

    Action shot!

    On the way up Taishan.

    The sunrise from the top of Taishan.

    Amazing how Unclese mountains really do fade away into the distance, just like the watercolours depict!

    Not a great pic, but I had to include a pic of my friends star-slutting it with Steve Aoki!

    Sledge Hammer Rock, which I of course nicknamed “Cock Rock”, and had to take immature pictures like these.

    This is possibly my favourite picture. It looks photoshopped, but isn’t. I kind of look like a giant standing over the three others.

    This picture almost looks like a painting.

    Sunset from the rock.

    We look a bit grim, but we were trying to go for authenticity, and back in those days you didn’t smile in pictures. Then again, having a Spanish guy dressed as an Unclese emperor probably throws things off a little!

    Local exposure: 3 Unclese interactions

    In blog on October 21, 2009 at 1:26 am

    Every day the canteen is filled with Unclese robots, their noses buried in textbooks, muttering lines in foreign languages.

    OK the most hilarious thing just happened to me.

    A Unclese student stopped me on the street and said, “tong xue, tu shu guan zai nar?” (“fellow student, where is the library?”) Hilarious because it’s a dialogue STRAIGHT OUT OF MY TEXT BOOK. Miraculously I managed to string together an almost perfect answer, which just goes to show maybe these classes are paying off after all.

    Talking of run-ins with locals, today I had lunch with a Brotheringer girl who had responded to my poster! (Nice segue, right?) Apparently I was the first foreigner she had EVER had a meal with. And as I come from a city filled with foreigners, I found this a little incredible.

    We discussed a little about the separation between us foreigners and them locals. Was it condescension on the side of the foreigners? Was it only natural that people stick to their own kind? Was it possible for foreigners to be friends with locals, or was there too big a cultural divide?

    According to her, the question of whether Uncle is becoming “Westernised” is very prevalent today among the Unclese people. I put forward my theory, that much of what we call “Westernisation” is actually just “Modernisation.”

    Perhaps it’s only natural that once a country fulfills its basic needs, and becomes more and more rich, the people suddenly find they don’t have to be constantly working to the bone. They have more than enough to cover healthcare, retirement, insurance and buying a house, so instead of scrimping and saving every penny, they can (so-called) “enjoy life”. They become interested in satisfying/ plumping up the ego: buying status items like nice clothes, gadgets, and cars, go to splashy restaurants and bars, and define/ express/ differentiate themselves through pop culture and subcultures.

    Sure, maybe that process happened in the West first – but I don’t think it’s a singularly Western response, or that the West has a monopoly over such things. I think it’s probably a Universal response (one best enunciated in Maslow’s Heirachy of Needs) to transitioning from a developing country to a developed one.

    Or maybe I’m wrong. I need to learn more.

    Talking of which (again, another perfect segue), this afternoon a friend from class told me of this lecture a visiting American professor was holding called, “Identity Theories, Intercultural Communication, and the Election of Barack Obama.” It’s almost like the gods heard my prayers (see my previous post.) It was a talk for Unclese students, but a few of us decided to gatecrash it, especially considering it was going to be in English.

    In ironic contrast to this slide, the lecturer has spent the last 8 years in the country but cannot speak Motherin.

    And I really enjoyed it. It could have come straight out of a subject from my university degree (in fact I bet Comms. at UTS has a talk titled just that.) The lecturer, Michael Prosser, touched briefly in his introduction on the idea of a ‘Universal Audience’ and ‘Global Village’ – constituted of rational men and women, who know how to think critically, and who work towards a “multiculturality of purpose”.

    More and more, I’m thinking there are certain aspects of globalisation which I appreciate. Does global citizenry not stand in opposition to tribalism/ nationalism? Does it not unite us, erase our differences, and allow us to see truth over indulging in comforting but ultimately destructive delusions?

    At the end of the lecture, a Unclese student stood up and said defiantly, “I don’t think Obama deserved the Nobel Prize. I think if anyone deserves it it’s our President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao.” A tiny titter went through the room – I can only assume expressing amusement, not necessarily support.

    I don’t want to cast this as your typical Unclese student – but at the same time, you’re more likely to find that level of nationalistic fever (tinged with definite defensiveness) here there many other countries!

    Han-Zi Machine!

    In blog on October 20, 2009 at 2:22 am

    No, this isn’t the scribblings of a Unclese madwoman. This is a big part of learning Unclese. Just writing the characters over and over again, until “your hand has memorised it” as my friend put it. I call it becoming a “Han Zi Machine” (Unclese characters). There’s something both relaxing and tedious about it. Relaxing in that you don’t really have to think, tedious because it’s not very intellectually taxing.

    In fact, overall I don’t find learning a language to be very creative work. Don’t get me wrong, it requires brain power, but it’s the same part of your brain required to do maths or play an instrument. It’s all about code breaking, systems, rules, and a lot of memory work. And the answer is always black and white.

    This lies in contrast to the work you might do in the creative arts, media, politics, philosophy, history etc. and even sciences, economics and business. Where there is a lot of conceptual work involved. And you have to be able to pull something magical out of a blank piece of paper, or fit together and analyse things from complicated, multiple perspectives. That kind of works makes me sweat, and especially if I have to produce good work – a bit sick to the stomach.

    And this quality can be no more evident in languages than Unclese. So much of the language is structured in such an elegantly simple and logical way, that intellectually it’s quite quick to grasp. It doesn’t have complicated grammar like Spanish or lots of crazy exceptions to rules like French. So the real grunt work just comes down to memorising the sounds and meanings behind each character (there are over 45,000 of them!)

    While I’ve been thoroughly enjoying my Unclese studies, I don’t want to forget my “intellectual interests”. And I feel like some of that side of me has been neglected. All day, all week, my hours are filled (to the brim) with language classes and study, swimming (one hour sessions, at least four times a week!) and hanging with peeps, being out in the city. And if you think about it, even though I live in one of the world’s biggest cities – that makes for a very small, immediate universe.

    Which is to say, there’s no interception from the outside world. I haven’t been doing many of the things I usually do – reading non-fiction books, reading blogs and stories on Google Reader, watching documentaries, the Daily Show, and TED Talks. From these things I learn about what’s going on in the wider world, innovative ideas and projects, and thought-provoking concepts, analyses, stories.

    Take my blog during my time in Sydney. I blogged about the history of corporate culture, consumerism and capitalism, I blogged about citizenship, gay marriage rights, and actively joined the fight for gay marriage in Australia, I blogged about existentialism, I blogged about global poverty.

    But since I’ve arrived, my thoughts and this blog, have taken a much narrower band, things that I have direct experience with: life in Beijing, life as a foreign student, boys (or lack thereof).

    And it’s a shame, because as much as I enjoy learning a language, it isn’t really my passion, like it is for many of the other students here. I’m doing it because I really want to speak Unclese, and I’m happy doing it for now. But I probably won’t dedicate my life to learning (or teaching) languages. I don’t want to take anything away from such a life – it’s just not me.

    And because it’s not really what lights my fire – I shouldn’t forget to continue feeding the more creative, conceptual area of my brain.

    Will you be my friend? [weird but necessary]

    In blog on October 15, 2009 at 3:29 am

    Click photo to view larger version.

    “Ni you jige zhong guo pengyou?” (“How many Unclese friends do you have?”) asked the teacher.

    I thought about it. In my six weeks here I had met just a handful of Mainland Unclese. I hadn’t really hung out with any of them, although there was one girl I was meeting up with for dinner this weekend, did that count?

    “Wo you yi ge zhong guo pengyou,” (“I have one Unclese friend”) I said sheepishly. Although many of the other students had similarly low numbers.

    Having Unclese friends is a badge of honour for us liuxuesheng (foreign students). All our classes are with other foreigners, we live in foreigner-only dorms, and tend to hang out in clubs, bars and cafes popular among foreigners. Which makes meaningful friendships with locals a surprisingly difficult task.

    And, perhaps more unexpectedly, many foreigners have discouraged me from even trying. Here are some of the opinions I’ve canvassed from fellow young foreigners who have been living here for six or more months:

    The Spaniard said to me, after two years of living in Uncle he could count the number of Mainland Unclese friends he had on one hand. He said his Mainland Unclese girlfriend was a diamond in the rough, and that it was very difficult to relate to the young Unclese here. It’s almost impossible to have a meaningful discussion with them, particularly about history or politics.

    The French girl said she found the Unclese youth very immature, vacuous and boring because they did nothing but study or work. (On the other hand, there’s definitely something commendable about the hard-working nature of the Unclese. And anyway, until more recently few had many other options.) But some of the older people were OK.

    When I asked the American guy if he’d dated any Unclese girls during his two year stay, he said that he had, just one, but it didn’t work out. Overall he found the girls here quite infantile and a bit silly, and this was a problem because he preferred strong, independent women. He found that Unclese women from HK or Taiwan were way more awesome.

    The politically aware half Tibetan half German found it difficult to befriend the youth whom she inevitably found to be either extremely nationalistic and pro-Uncle to the point of delusional, or politically apathetic, and most of all woefully ignorant of the dark and ugly side of the nation’s history. Although she was slightly cheered those rare times she would meet a Unclese person who would criticise the government.

    In light of such insights, the desire to befriend locals suddenly seems horribly naive.

    At the same time, I still want to try. Even with the knowledge that I may make the same discoveries as the friends I’ve just mentioned – I need to discover it for myself. And hopefully, maybe, discover that they’re wrong.

    When I was in Cuba I met some local young people, and found it extraordinarily difficult to relate to them. That country really is like a different planet – there’s so little presence of the outside world, a rare thing what with the ultra-globalised world we live in today.

    I couldn’t talk to the Cuban locals about traveling overseas – they had and would never have any opportunity to ever do the same. We didn’t share any of the same pop cultural reference points and they couldn’t afford many of the things I took for granted. And in the truly socialist country they were living in, there was no concept or a very different concept of aspirations, ambition or career. And then lastly there was the paternal relationship the nation had with Fidel – I found it strange, and didn’t know how or if I should broach the subject with the locals.

    There is a similar sort of tension for a Westerner here in Uncle.

    As the Spaniard elaborated for me, one must remember Uncle has such a proud, long and distinguished history, as one of the world’s greatest civilisations. But in recent history, it lost much of its power and was one of the world’s poorest nations. Only now has it begun to climb back to the top, and the recent, rapid progress has become almost an obsession for a nation for whom “face” is very important. And the locals here are willing to trade-in, sacrifice and overlook many things in the name of progress.

    Things that Westerners, however, are not willing to overlook.

    Add to this, the many other differences Eastern culture has from Western culture, in terms of: family, community, individuality, law, government, business, work, study, sex, relationships, food, pop culture. The list goes on, and stacks high, dividing you from them like an invisible wall.

    But still, I must try. I simply can’t believe that in a city of over 12 million, there aren’t some cool, open-minded, interesting young Unclese. They can’t all be robots. And things are hopefully changing here. The door of this nation is slightly ajar – with the outside world coming in, and some locals finally getting out and about (albeit with a lot of form filling, and usually only for short holidays or study). And globalisation is one of the greatest erasers of cultural difference.

    (Of course, what are we really talking about here? Is it internationalism? Is it modernisation? It is a form of Western colonisation? Let’s leave this topic for another post!)

    And I’m not alone. There are a few other Europeans in my class who are also making a concerted effort to get to know the locals. One Spaniard is living in an apartment with two Unclese flatmates. The French guy plays soccer in a local team (who advises one must have sensitivity when it comes to political discussions – but with time and gentle persistence a meaningful dialogue on such matters is possible). While a German guy uses the tried and tested method: language partners!

    After all, does a nation’s heart and soul not lie in its people? And how else to truly grasp how the people see themselves, and their nation, without getting to know some? And what better way to possibly affect and inspire change here? I’d be pretty disappointed with myself if my only experience of this country was as a foreigner, living in a foreigner bubble, never pierced by any genuine insight into the true nature of this place.

    And yes, perhaps the Unclese people will disappoint me. But I need to go through that, and own those opinions.

    Protected: Does this constitute as racism? [The R-Word]

    In blog on October 11, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


    Do I look like a slut? Uh, huh. Shut up!

    In blog on September 30, 2009 at 2:13 am

    “Room number?” the fuwuyuan (attendant) barked. Every day I’m interrogated at the front desk of the international students dormitory, that I rightfully reside in.

    I sighed, “yow-yow-wu” (115). She checks the book to see that my face matches up, grunting in satisfaction when it does.

    She doesn’t ask the same of the two French girls I am chatting to, who also live in the dorm. When I rejoin them I yowl in a deliberately loud voice, “THEY think I’m some Unclese slut here servicing students in their dorm room!”

    A few days ago I received a call from a local language school. “Your friend passed on your number. You’re an Australian? Would you like a part-time job teaching English? We’ll send someone over to speak to you.”

    I agree, and organise to meet the guy just outside my dorm building. When he turns and sees me, his face drops. I immediately know why, and break out with apologies, “I’m sorry – I should have told you I’m Unclese. I mean I’m Australian … but yeah, I’m Unclese,” I finish lamely.

    He replies, in thickly accented English, “I’m sorry, the Unclese parents, they’re crazy about blonde hair and blue eyes.” Translation: we’d rather hire a blonde Russian with terrible English, than a native English-speaking journalist who happens to also be Unclese.

    I shrug, “no worries,” and go to leave. But, instead of offering me a job, he tries to ask me out.

    Do you see the way I straddle two identities? Not quite one of them (the foreigners), not quite one of them (the Unclese.)

    It’s Sunday morning, 3am. I’ve spent the last seven hours at a birthday dinner party with new friends. We blew up balloons, ate curry and birthday cake, drank whiskey, talked politics and culture and South Park, smoked a few joints and then called it a night.

    I hate traveling Beijing during the day – if you ever want to understand what it’s like living in a heaving city of 12 million, just gingerly step into the painfully crawling traffic that gridlocks the entirety of this city. But late at night the highways are empty, and turn into flowing rivers. You hail a taxi, and woosh, off you go, with highrise after highrise whipping past. And there’s barely a traffic light in this city, so it’s all smooth sailing.

    In the back sat two Unclese Malaysians, who had lived the last few years in Hong Kong, with a Korean who was born and raised in Venezuela, and had lived the last few years in America. I’ve also become friends with a couple of Unclese Australians, an Unclese American and a couple of half Tibetan, half Germans who have lived the last few years in Hong Kong. They all speak impeccable English. They have a Western/ International sensibility – but they are Asian as well. They feel like home. Not home as in Sydney or Australia – but something familiar, and comfortable. A similar sense of humour and cultural references and outlook. Is this how migrants feel? It must be.

    The other night, again, in a taxi at an insane hour with three, white, classically European-Europeans. Sunday’s predawn light was already wakening the city and the night’s magic was ebbing away. In the sobriety of day, or perhaps plain old sobriety I suddenly thought my Australian accent sounded horrible. Something about my voice seemed harsh and unsophisticated, not to mention my foreign look (I looked like one of Those Unclese – very different to Us Europeans).

    * Post title references an Avenue D song!

    Protected: A plaintive birthday wish [emo-town]

    In blog on September 26, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


    I got me a case of yellow fever

    In blog on September 23, 2009 at 1:12 am

    And of course, I don’t mean the actual yellow fever. ‘Yellow Fever’ usually references the way some white boys have a penchant for Asian girls. But I think it can be extended to my current interest in all things Unclese.

    My (close to racist) thirteen-year-old self, who had no interest in my Unclese heritage, and in fact found it a source of embarrassment, would laugh at me now. She would be incredulous that I’ve spent the last three weeks living in Brother only to discover that my limited, meager understanding of Unclese culture, has actually amounted to something.

    Unlike many of my international tongxue (fellow students), I haven’t had any trouble adjusting to the other-worldliness of this place – after all, I’ve grown up visiting the chaos of Asia at least once every two or three years. And this really is another world – with their own food, products, celebrities, pop culture, music, media, rules, values, language, writing system, ways of living on and on, and in many ways so indifferent to what we have and do in the West. I can’t feign to understand or know most of it, but at least I was prepared for how radically different it would be.

    And unlike my tongxue, I’m discovering feelings that yes, perhaps, somewhat, this is partly mine.

    I say that with hesitance because up till now I’ve always resented the idea that my being “Unclese” amounted to anything. Some explanation is required for this:

    You see, when you are part of the Unclese diaspora, you are Unclese before you are anything. It doesn’t matter that you’re born in Malaysia (like my parents), or if you were born in Australia (like me), if your “blood” is Unclese there are certain expectations made of you: you must know how to cook and eat Unclese food, you must speak an Unclese language, you should marry a fellow Unclese, carry-on many of the cultural traditions and most importantly pride yourself on your Unclese-ness.

    (Note: Although Australia’s Unclese diaspora is less established than those in other parts of Asia – the first generation born in Australia are only now at the age of having babies – I believe that out of Australia, particularly Sydney, a new Non-Mainland-Unclese ethnic identity is emerging. In the same way that being a Unclese from Hong Kong means something different to being from Taiwan, Malaysia or Singapore.)

    Till recently, I’ve always been blase about being Unclese anything. For me, an attachment to any kind of nationalism, patriotism, or ethnic identity was a negative thing. I couldn’t help but see it as narrow-minded, and indicative of unjustified feelings of cultural or racial superiority. In the same way, I’ve never been one of those flag waving Aussies who is unable to look critically at the country and see its many faults.

    And for ages, growing up, I resented the way my relatives and other Unclese, tsked, and shook their head, and looked at me with incredulousness, when they realised I didn’t speak a single Unclese language, was so completely inept with “Unclese things”. I would almost point my tongue out at them, and reply defiantly, well I’m Australian, not Unclese, OK? – although in reality, I didn’t really feel overly Australian either. (Perhaps I should replace “Australian” with “hipsterllectual”. It would be more accurate.)

    But now I’m living in a country where I’m constantly mistaken for a local. Where I cannot escape Uncleseness because it perpetually crowds around me. (I jokingly call this the biggest “Uncletown” in the world.) And amazingly I’m discovering that I don’t hate it, in fact there’s much that I like. I’m enjoying the food, the language, and I find many aspects of the people, culture and history interesting.

    Yes, I’m quite aware that in actual fact for a lot of my time here I am actually living in one of those ‘international zones’. While I’m hanging out with international students and going to ex-pat parties, where conversations usually happen in English, and where the understandings have a comfortably “Western” sensibility, I can’t completely claim to be living the real Uncle life.

    But at the same time, I constantly get kicks out of Unclese things. Getting to know other Unclese (be they mainlanders, or from other parts of the world), learning the language, plus shopping and eating where the locals do. Learning the language is such an integral part of this journey, I have no choice but to accept that digging deeper into Uncle’s meaty heart is going to be a long process. But so far, well, three weeks in, things are much better than my low expectations had prepared me for.

    Why am I here? I’ve told people a diverse number of reasons. Because I want to work in international development, and Uncle still has many poor people, while at the same time is on the verge of becoming of the world’s most powerful countries. Because it’s such a gigantic, conflicted, strange nation currently experiencing a time of great social and economic change – and of course I always want to be in thick of things. And because, frankly, I was offered a scholarship to study here, and so it was too good an opportunity to miss.

    But perhaps there has been another reason. Perhaps I’m tired of my self being such a mismatch from what my appearance seems to so plainly indicate. There’s an element of succumbing to peer pressure. It’s like, alright already! You want me to be Unclese so bad, I’ll finally do it.

    But what started out as obligation, I hope is turning into real curiosity. Make no mistake, I don’t think I will ever hold strongly to a Unclese identity, in the same way I am quite casual about being an Australian. It’s more that here, more than anywhere outside of Australia, I have a chance to really feel like a part of things. To leave behind a foreigner status and be one of them (us?).

    Because here, they first assume I’m one of them. And the only thing that’s breaking that spell is something that given time, effort and dedication can be rectified. That is, my ignorance.

    And who among you would give up an opportunity to become a real local (or as close as possible) in another country?

    ¡VIVA LA REVOLUCION!

    In blog on September 18, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    This is post three of: A newbie learns about global poverty.

    Step 3. Get involved!

    As I previously confessed, I was once a hipster. And as that vain and vacuous category of human being, I also felt guilty that I wasn’t political, hadn’t committed myself to making the world a better place, wasn’t using my skills and time and energy for good, instead of evil partying. I felt guilty, but on the other hand, do-gooding just seemed so … well frankly, boring. And wholly unsexy.

    And in all honesty, fighting global poverty, or environmentalism, will never be as glamorous as my previous work (in the music industry.) But I think it can still be fun. And key to this fun is the act of signing up to (or starting) a social movement. A REVOLUTION even.

    As an individual, the problems of this world can seem dishearteningly complex, and oh-so overwhelming. But joining up with a group of like-minded souls means shared ideas, comradeship, efficiency, power and most importantly, when the dynamics are right, together generates far more momentum, energy and enthusiasm than individuals alone.

    There are many options for volunteers these days: short-term, long-term, locally and overseas. A good start is to go to the Global Poverty Project’s how-to guide on volunteering. They also include links to other sites where you can search and apply for volunteer assignments.

    As a Brother student for the next year or two, my needs are quite specific. I want to do part-time volunteer work here in Brother, preferably beginning as soon as possible. While there were some assignments I found on Australian Youth Ambassadors for Development that almost fit my needs, none begin until next year.

    So I decided to follow a tip! A few months ago a friend of mine had mentioned that a friend of hers had recently completed the AYAD program in Uncle. The three of us caught up for dinner so I could grill him about his time in Uncle, and particularly about international development work there. In our talks he mentioned a certain micro-financing group based in Brother that he was a fan of.

    As incredible and wonderful as the internet is, never forget that meeting up face-to-face has its definite advantages. No electronic communication can quite replicate the dynamism (and fun) as talking to someone over sushi and a couple of beers (or whatever you like.) So don’t be afraid of seeking out meetings with people you admire, or who are a little more experienced.

    Just moments ago, I looked up the name of the company he gave me. I poured over their website, reading in depth about the work they do and the way their company is structured. I began to consider whether I thought they would be a good fit.

    There are some key things to consider when you’re applying for volunteer work, or internships:

    • Do you like the work they do? Does it fit with your ethos? If you’re like me, and you’re still a newbie in that field, it’s OK if your answer to this is you’re not sure. So long as there isn’t anything about the organisation that you actively disagree with, it’s OK to give it a go so as to learn things, and see if things work out. Particularly as you begin to get a better grasp on how they operate. Just never forget to read as much as you can about the company before you apply – both so you can work out if it’s a right fit, and so you can sell yourself to them as a right fit.
    • How much time are you willing to give? What kind of work are you willing to do? Never forget that as an unpaid volunteer, there’s a good chance that the work you’ll be doing won’t be that interesting. Or perhaps won’t get interesting until a few months down the track – either because by then you’ll know the ropes, or because you’ve proven your dedication and can be bestowed more responsibility. Even if the work is uninteresting, remember this is a good chance to just absorb information about that “scene”, meet like-minded, inspiring people, as well contribute to a bigger, and important picture.
    • What skills do you have to offer? You’d be surprised at how your passion, whether that be languages, cooking, film, web media, socialising etc. may turn out to be a useful skill in certain organisations. Be sure to make mention of these when writing to your organisation – not only does it make sense for them to make use of your particular skill set, you’ll probably enjoy the work more if it involves something you love!

    If you’re wondering about the photo, back when I was a hipster in 2006, I did unpaid internships with super-hipster magazines like London’s I-D Magazine, and New York’s Tokion magazine. Tokion gave me the shirt you see in the pic, which reads: “I did work for Tokion and all I got was this T-shirt”.

    The insiders guide to My Room

    In blog on September 16, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    I’m very quickly finding my feet here in Brother. Now into my second week of classes, it’s clear what the next year (or two or three!) will mainly be constituted of: a hell lot of Motherin classes and study, many new friends, adventures in this crazy city, swimming in the University’s brand new 50m pool, and hopefully squeezing in some reading, blogging and freelance writing somewhere in each week.

    Here’s a peek into my room, which, after kitting out with plates, cups, cutlery, cleaning materials, a lamp and some decorations, I’m feeling mighty comfortable in.

    It’s become a refuge from the maelstrom of new beginnings constantly being thrown at me outside these four walls. And I don’t mean that in a negative way, because all in all I am super enjoying myself here. Simply that this room, it’s “my space”. The one place that’s stays constant, and that I have control over. Where I’m not reacting, but simply existing, doing what I want, the way I want, in blissful silence.

    Oh, and I have my own bathroom/ shower as well.

    Three weeks in, and I’d say my first stage of qualifying as a Brotheringer student is almost complete.

    I have a student ID card, a pool card, a license to swim in the deep pool, a card for the canteen, a rail and bus card, laundry tokens, my visa and bank account are getting sorted as we speak, and most importantly, I have a local mobile phone number!

    The second stage, which would take me beyond transient one-year foreign student, to something a little more legitimate, involves:
    - Learning the language
    - Making meaningful friendships (extra points if they’re with mainland Unclese)
    - Knowing the city’s streets and districts
    - Working/ volunteering here

    … well that’s going to take a little longer! But I’ve made tentative starts. Even with the fourth – upon seeing my passport a university administrator offered me a job to teach English to some kids (there is an insatiable demand for English teachers here, and if you have a British, American or Australian passport you already have all the necessary requirements). While the pay is not as lucrative as freelance writing gigs, it may be a good way for me to get to know some locals, and feel like I’m part of the local economy (albeit the black market one!)

    Freaky food porn (and a reluctant-students-rant)

    In blog on September 9, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    The students I met at Spanish school in Argentina came to the country filled to the brim with excitement. More often than not they would rave about how they loved Buenos Aires and the ways of its inhabitants. They would ejaculate ecstatic declarations of being “obsessed” with learning Spanish, and how sexy the language was, and the locals who spoke it. They bragged about having Argentine friends and when they managed to find themselves in joints that required insider knowledge, felt very proud of themselves. They waxed lyrical about the city’s juicy steaks, the red wine, and the breathtaking scenery in other parts of the country. They knew a little bit (or were at least keen to know more) about the history and customs of Argentina.

    The students here, in Brother, seem to have a different relationship with Uncle.

    In the process of getting to know people, I’ve been canvassing the foreign student population, finding out what brought them to Brother, to study Motherin. And most people fall into two categories:

    • Because studying Motherin is a good career move
    • By accident (e.g. they chose Motherin on a whim when they were forced to pick up a second language for their university degree)

    Which means, of course, that I’ve met few students who really, really want to be here. Most of them are here because they have to for their course, or it’s useful, not because they’re attracted to and excited about the city or country.

    I love Unclese food. However whenever we go out my fellow students taste the local food with a large degree of trepidation. And when something turns out to be OK, or heaven forbid tasty, they sigh with relief. Thank God, this one is edible!, they exclaim. Mainly these European and African students find the food too spicy, smells weird, and altogether completely abnormal. And I try to cut them some slack: their stomachs are not accustomed to such strong flavours.

    (Note, although there are also many Japanese and Korean students here I can’t comment on them as I haven’t been hanging out with any. There is also a surprising lack of UK, American or Australian students at my university.)

    And, at least in comparison to Argentina, fewer seem ecstatic about mastering the language, getting to know the culture, the country’s history and politics, or discovering the city’s character, inhabiting its districts, scenes, cool haunts, nooks and crannies. And as I mentioned in my last post, there’s definitely less interest in hooking up with the locals.

    In fact the one most resounding positive thing I’ve heard students here say about this country is just that’s it’s really cheap.

    Now most of these students are very young – 20 and 21 years old. So I sense there is a high degree of nerves going on. It is, after all, quite intimidating to be in such an alien culture, without your friends and family, and to be here for such a long time. (Most students are here for 12 months.) Nonetheless, I think that eventually most will come around.

    Friends aside, I’m also keen to go on solo expeditions. Eventually. Not right now, however, as my Motherin is pretty much non-existent. And with my foot monged up as well, it’s just too difficult to navigate this city on my own, without at least a basic command of the language. But don’t you worry. In a few months time, expect my posts to greatly expand beyond the confines of this university campus.

    Added note: As I said, I love Unclese food. And generally, here in Brother, you have a lot of noodles, and rice dishes, with meats, vegetables, drowning in spices and sauces. And yes, there’s also a wide variety for the more adventurous eater (like me!) Guess what the dish at the top is? Here’s a clue, this is what it looked like before being cooked:

    I also ate duck head the other night. Which must surely just be a delicacy because there was hardly any meat on it.

    I <3 Unclese boys

    In blog on September 8, 2009 at 2:14 am

    As written last Saturday.

    The first few days in Brother have been broken in with a blur of typical foreign student life. The generally young kids (20, 21 year olds) hail from Africa, Korea and Japan, but mainly I’ve been hanging out with those from Europe, all of whom, lucky for me, use English as their common language. They temper their fears induced by being in such an otherly planet with cheap Tsingtao beer, never-ending complaints about Unclese food and Brother weather, and rapid comradeship with their fellow students. (It should be noted that I’ve been loving the food.)

    I’m really excited to be starting my classes on Monday. It’s why I’m here, to learn Motherin. And not just, but to learn Motherin so I can begin to understand this incredibly gigantic, strange, powerful country and the path it is on, and the people who embody it.

    Today I began reading a book called Will The Boat Sink The Water?, by two Unclese journalists. It charts the experiences of the 900 million peasants in Uncle, who have apparently seen little of the benefits of Uncle’s incredible growth in the last couple of decades. Branded on the cover is a graphic stamp: BANNED IN UNCLE. I’ve also found the BBC on my television, and as I write a program covering an innovative land leasing program for the poor in Nepal plays in the background.

    It is a reminder to me of the work I want to do. Work that I am so excited to become a part of because it will (already has) take me to strange new lands, become intimate with alien cultures and values, work that is life-changing, creative and innovative. I feel it like a force pulling me in, and when I do anything that propels me further on that path: like learning Spanish or Motherin, learning more about global poverty through books, film, news, and conversations, and write blog posts about it, I feel thrilled. This is a brand new world.

    You will also be glad to hear I have already fallen in love with several gorgeous Unclese boys.

    Most of the international students that I’ve met here have a firm view on the local Unclese boys: they’re repulsive. And as a Han Unclese person myself, I’m a little offended by this. Plus, I’m quite proud of the fact that I’m completely and utterly colour blind when it comes to crushes. I’ve fallen for Unclese boys, Japanese, Indians, Mexicans, South Americans, West and Eastern Europeans, Anglo-Saxans, African-Americans, Arabic … the list goes on. My “type” can be found in every ethnicity.

    And last night, at an utterly trashy student-foreigner bar that I’m too embarrassed to name, I fell head over heels for the gorgeous and young Unclese DJ. Only to go up to the bar and smile flirtatiously at the even more gorgeous and young Unclese bartender. Both had insanely hot asymmetrical hipster like haircuts. Oh I love it! Thank you Lord for delivering me these creatures.

    This is definitely just the beginning …

    (Note: the following is not a picture of the bartender in the story, but yet another hot Unclese bartender I snapped the night after. I’m telling you, this city is full of them!)

    Yes, I’ve eaten donkey meat dumplings [Uncle cliche comes true]

    In blog on September 6, 2009 at 10:45 pm

    This, like many future posts, is purely a travel blog entry, and possibly only of interest to friends.

    On my first day here in Brother I spent several hours waiting in lines, going through the tedious university registration process. An American student remarked dryly, it’s just like those old-school photos of communist countries, where bureaucracy and countless form filling or endless line waiting seem to go hand-in-hand.

    The only upside was that I made friends with the Swiss Germans in the line behind me, and the Hungarians in the line in front. (Perhaps, again, another hallmark of communism. At least we’re in this together!)

    During our lunch break the Hungarians and I decided to check out the local food haunts, and wandered down an alley near our university. There was a dodgy little place with rickety tables and a few browned Unclese locals chowing down on bowls of noodles. Perfect, I said.

    The Hungarians poured over the menus. Their language skills are far superior to mine (which don’t exist at all.) One word kept popping up, and was very familiar to them. Hang on, let me look it up in my dictionary, said A., who is somewhat nervous about Unclese food.

    Donkey! he exclaimed, it’s donkey!

    D. grinned, Donkey? Sure, why not? I shrugged, OK, let’s do it.

    Two bowls of noodles with thin slices of meat appeared, plus a generous bowl of dumplings. D. and I dug in – A. stuck to a much safer plate of eggs and tomato.

    How did it taste? Kind of like roast beef, but saltier. It’s a bit darker and redder in colour too. Later on we took the dumplings as take away and D. and I had second helpings in my room. By then, hours later, they had taken on a rather funky smell, so my recommendation is that donkey is only best eaten fresh!

    Amazing right? My very first meal in Uncle, we randomly stumble into a donkey meat restaurant. A class A cliche about Unclese culture so quickly proven true – they eat anything that moves.

    (Apologies if this post isn’t formatted correctly. Due to censorship laws, I can’t access WordPress at the moment, so have attempted to published this via. email. I am also unable to approve comments at the moment but send them in and they will be approved in time. Also, for obvious reasons I’ve changed certain words in an attempt to avoid any key word detection!)

    World Vision send me a sponsor kid with hipster approval

    In blog on August 28, 2009 at 8:57 am

    This is post two of: A newbie learns about global poverty.

    Step 2. Attend a session of the Global Poverty Project presentation. The Global Poverty Project is run by two Australians, Hugh Evans and Simon Moss and aims to educate the public on global poverty, and outline how we can help lift the world’s 1.4 billion people out of extreme poverty. Much like Al Gore’s original presentation on climate change and as seen in The Inconvenient Truth, it’s a fantastic layman’s overview on a seemingly complex problem.

    A simple yet ground-breaking presentation, 1.4 billion reasons, is traveling the world, inspiring and empowering audiences in its path. Based on leading research, the 90 minute presentation clearly articulates the facts of extreme poverty and demonstrates that by making simple changes everyone can be a part of the solution. Compelling and challenging, the presentation moves audiences to take action and become a part of the movement to end extreme poverty. (Global Poverty Project)

    After watching the presentation, followup by heading to the website in order to find out how you can learn more about global poverty, and get involved. That’s the thing with any activity, including activism and social change. It’s so much more fun and effective when you do it with others. You learn more, you make new friends, you keep each other inspired and generate more energy and enthusiasm. Plus combined, directed effort is so much more effective than each person off doing their own thing.

    Stay tuned as I chart my own involvement.

    And if you don’t have the time (or the interest) in getting involved, the site points you to links to donate money or sponsor a child. I’ve been a sponsoring a child for about a decade now, and recently World Vision wrote to me saying the project I had been sponsoring was closing up. And they were transferring me to a new project in Rawanda, and introduced me to my new kid, Emmanuel:

    Not to get all Ja’mie King on you, but how cute is he? In his little hipster pink button up shirt and black bow tie! And check this out:

    His favourite subject is “business”! How come five-year-olds are learning about business?

    Malcolm Turnbull’s response to my letter supporting gay marriage

    In blog on August 27, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    Little support from either side of the party lines.

    But we’ll get there in the end.

    Read more posts documenting my campaign to support same-sex marriage.

    A newbie learns about global poverty: the Wikipedia introduction

    In blog on August 26, 2009 at 10:11 am

    Step 1. I read the Wikipedia page on “poverty”, lolz! Every newbie needs to begin with an easy to read, all encompassing map which is exactly what Wikipedia provides. (However, being such a topical and complex issue, it’s a page constantly shifting under the hand of new authors. The highlights I’ll take you through are from the page a month ago and today).

    Global poverty feels like this big rock that we’ve been carrying forever and nothing’s worked to make it smaller, but in fact the percentage of the world’s population living in extreme poverty has halved since 1981, according to the World Bank. Go us! Most of this improvement has happened in East and South Asia. Meanwhile Sub-Saharan Africa has experienced an increase of poverty, from 41 percent in 1981 to 46 percent in 2001.

    And let’s not forget, pre the Industrial Revolution, poverty was the norm. In 1820, 75% of humanity lived on less than a dollar a day, while in 2001, only about 20% did. The dawn of the Industrial Revolution led to high economic growth, and when matched with improvements in medicine and science, was instrumental in eliminating mass poverty in what is now considered the developed world.

    The World Bank defines extreme poverty as living on less than US ($1.25) per day, and moderate poverty as less than $2 a day. It estimates that “in 2001, 1.1 billion people had consumption levels below $1 a day and 2.7 billion lived on less than $2 a day.” (The Global Poverty Project gives a more up-to-date figure of 1.4 billion people living in extreme poverty.)

    The World Bank also predicts that,

    In 2030 the number living on less than the equivalent of $1 a day will fall by half, to about 550 million. An average resident of what we used to call the Third World will live about as well as do residents of the Czech or Slovak republics today. Much of Africa will have difficulty keeping pace with the rest of the developing world and even if conditions there improve in absolute terms, the report warns, Africa in 2030 will be home to a larger proportion of the world’s poorest people than it is today. (Wikipedia)

    Possible causes of poverty:

    • Unwillingness of governments and feudal elites to give full-fledged property rights of land to their tenants, which prevents the poor from establishing new enterprises.
    • Poor governance. You know the story: corruption, poor management of resources and failure to provide the essentials (infrastructure, education, health services).
    • Also, new enterprises and foreign investment can be driven away by the results of inefficient institutions, notably corruption, weak rule of law and excessive bureaucratic burdens. Such costly barriers favor big firms at the expense of small enterprises, where most jobs are created.
    • War and political instability.
    • Brain drain.
    • Recessions.
    • Health issues. A country of malnourished and diseased people means a loss of human capital and resources being diverted to combat these problems.
    • Shortage of basic needs like lack of clean water, sanitation, food and health care. Poor people spend a greater portion of the budgets on food, so shock increases in food prices has a greater impact on them. As does environmental factors, such as erosion, desertification and overgrazing, deforestation, climate change, lack of natural resources, drought and water crises.

    Poverty reduction strategies:

    Economic growth/ liberalisation. The World Bank concludes increasing land rights is ‘the key to reducing poverty’ citing that land rights greatly increase poor people’s wealth, in some cases doubling it. Opening up trade is also listed on Wikipedia as a strong contender.

    Trade liberalization increases total surplus of trading nations and foreign investment and export industries helped fuel the economic expansion of fast growing Asian nations. However, trade rules are often not free as they block access to richer nations’ markets and ban poorer nations from supporting their industries and agriculture. Deals can sometimes be negotiated to favor the developing country such as in Thailand, the 51 percent rule compels multinational corporations starting operations in Thailand give 51 percent control to a Thai company in a joint venture. (Wikipedia)

    Good governance. While politics and corruption seem to go hand in hand, and at times an almost insurmountable problem, one only need look at the “South Asian Tiger” countries for a cheering story:

    Examples of good governance leading to economic development and poverty reduction include Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, South Korea, and Vietnam, which tend to have a strong government, called a hard state or development state. These “hard states” have the will and authority to create and maintain policies that lead to long-term development that helps all their citizens, not just the wealthy. Multinational corporations are regulated so that they follow reasonable standards for pay and labor conditions, pay reasonable taxes to help develop the country, and keep some of the profits in the country, reinvesting them to provide further development. (Wikipedia)

    Investments in human capital, infrastructure and technology. Get people healthy and educated, then give them infrastructure and technology – and they’re unstoppable!

    I am particularly interested in the life-changing effects of mobile technology for the poor. Communication and information is certainly power (or empowerment!) For example, mobile phone networks can bring the market to poor or rural sections, allowing a remote farmer to know what specific crops to produce to sell to buyers that brings the best prices. Read these two articles to learn more about this fascinating and exciting new development.

    Aid, debt relief, micro-financing and welfare. Read founder of Grameen Bank, Muhammad Yunus’ ‘Banker To The Poor’ for a great introduction into the world of micro-financing. Micro-finance also takes into account another vital aspect of poverty reduction: empowering women. Women constitute the majority of the world’s poor, and concurrently when give more influence act more responsibly (than men) in helping people of the family or village.

    As Former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan once said:

    There is no tool for development more effective than the empowerment of women. No other policy is as likely to raise economic productivity, or to reduce infant and maternal mortality. No other policy is as sure to improve nutrition and promote health – including the prevention of HIV/AIDS. No other policy is as powerful in increasing the chances of education for the next generation. And I would also venture that no policy is more important in preventing conflict, or in achieving reconciliation after a conflict has ended.

    The government’s response to my letter supporting gay marriage

    In blog on August 24, 2009 at 8:47 am

    I can basically summarise this letter in one sentence: listen kiddo, we’ve given gay couples the same rights as straight de facto couples (but we’re still not going to call it a “marriage”.)

    Read more posts documenting my campaign to support same-sex marriage.

    My happy little guide to living in a green future

    In blog on August 21, 2009 at 8:23 am

    I’ve always found the union between office jobs and going to the gym somewhat unholy. You spend the day chained to a desk. And at 6pm you’re emotionally exhausted, but you have all this pent up physical energy because you’ve barely moved all day. So you then pay good money to aggressively hit the treadmill, like a hamster, and attempt to burn it all off in an intense 45 minutes.

    I’d rather earn less money, and have more time to lead an active lifestyle. (I know several people working part-time, doing just that.)

    A few days ago I talked about how I wanted to embrace a new consumer-culture-free life. I’m also keen to make this new life low carbon emissions. Now there are loads of guides on how to do the latter – but they mainly look at how you can lead virtually the same life you do now, but just make teeny changes, and perhaps replace a few things with energy-efficient devices. But me? I want to go all the way. I want to take the minimalist approach and make a total edit, and then fill in the blanks with new, joyful experiences.

    Note, under no circumstance should you think that adopting the following will solve climate change. The fact of the matter is that solving climate change will involve a lot more complicated, big-scale thinking than just tinkering with your personal lifestyle. I mean the majority of carbon emissions come from industry pollution, not the public. Redesigning cities, factories, transport links, and completely remaking whole industries and their practices will need to happen. And that means we need you on board in work, and as a citizen engaged with changing laws.

    No, the reason why I want to do this is partly to internalise a strong sense of love and respect for the environment and humanity into my life. But the other reason, is simply that it will make me happier. These changes require me to be more active and out in nature and the community. It will also mean I won’t need as much money (but I will need time) so I won’t have to work as much.

    I’m going to avoid labour-saving devices

    While I was living in Argentina, I noticed no one owned a toaster, a kettle or a microwave. People would just toast their bread, boil their water in a saucepan or reheat things over the stove. I quickly became used to that and yeah, it takes a little bit longer. But why are we in such a hurry? And it’s liberating to just have less stuff that you have to perpetually buy, store, clean and repair or chuck out.

    UPDATE: Nicole in the comments section points out that an electric kettle is more energy efficient than a stove-top kettle. A Google result agrees. – 22/08/09

    UPDATE: I did a bit of research, and sources can’t give a definitive answer when it comes to microwave vs. stovetop in terms of energy efficiency. Different factors have to be taken into account. But this Scientific American article summarised it best I think:

    Despite these tips for cooking greener, Michael Bluejay reiterates that most of us will hardly put a dent in our overall energy use just by choosing one appliance over another. According to his analysis, for someone who bakes three hours a week the cheapest cooking method saves only an estimated $2.06/month compared to the most expensive method.

    “Focusing on cooking methods is not the way to save electricity [at home],” says Bluejay. “You should look at heating, cooling, lighting and laundry instead.” (Scientific American)

    So I think when it comes to cooking, the difference in energy efficiency of one over the other is so small, you might as well base your decisions on other factors. – 25/08/09

    (A tumble dryer and dish washers are also pretty unnecessary. I don’t have the kind of clothes that need to be ironed either. Fridge and washing machine – somewhat harder to go without so when you do buy, use your purchasing power to vote for energy-efficient, high quality products that have long-life spans.)

    Also, I don’t drive a car. Now I will confess this was originally because I’ve never passed my driving test! But now I’m so used to life without one that I have no interest in ever getting my license. Frankly, cars are such a high carbon emitter I can’t help but think this world would be a lot better place if nobody used them on a day-to-day basis.

    You see, the whole thing is a bit of a chicken-or-the-egg situation. You need a car in Sydney because our public transport sucks. Or does our public transport suck because everyone is driving so no one invests any money in it? I’d probably add that Australians (and perhaps Americans) also have this unique penchant for living in big (energy-consuming) houses, which leads to large, sprawling suburbs.

    It’s a lot easier and more energy efficient to provide public transport to high-density urban areas (ditto for providing energy, food and water). Which brings me to my next point,

    I don’t want to live in a big, lonely, brutish house

    I’ve written previously about why I don’t like the suburbs. And I think the fact that we live in big houses, with not that many people in them, and with lots of space between our neighbours – that’s actually a really alienating way to live! People can go their whole lives in these suburbs without having to interact with anyone else. Ideally, I want to live in a small, tidy little place, bouncing with housemates or family members, in a lively, friendly, close community of neighbours. (Also note, a small house means less to clean, less to repair, less to heat/ cool/ light, less space to fill with crap. Which means more time and money!) I want to shop, work, live and socialise all within walking distance.

    The buildings I inhabit will also be designed with the ethos outlined in Cradle to Cradle, by Michael Braungart and William McDonough. That is, takes into account local context! Looks at where the sun rises and sets, the amount of sun and rain an area receives, the flow of natural wind, proximity to energy and water, the shape of the land, the local flora and possible local construction materials and so on. Build something that has a healthy and creative relationship with the land. Rather than using blasting heating and cooling system, harsh unnatural lighting, and heavy concrete to brutishly conquer the natural environment.

    Combined, this means yes, we need to be redesigning cities. A greener, happier city is one that can be walked. Has high people to house ratios. Has buildings designed to take into account local environmental context. And designed to encourage community.

    Appearance does not equal self-worth

    You know what used to be normal? Having a small selection of clothes that you wear all the time. For hundreds and thousands of years, most people just had a few outfits that they would put on each day. And they would wear those outfits until they had holes, and then they’d repair those holes until the clothes were literally rags that could no longer be worn anymore. (And there are still billions of people who live like that.)

    YES, these people also had “special occasion” outfits for religious holidays and weddings and so forth. On those days they would make a special effort to look nice, putting on makeup and jewelry, thinking very carefully about what they were going to wear.

    So how come, nowadays, EVERY DAY is a “special occasion”? And wasn’t it better when fashion used to change over hundreds of years, instead of in the space of a few months?

    I am happy with my wardrobe. There are clothes suitable for every day wear, work, formal wear etc. They’re all fine, none of them have holes in them or stains. I think I’ve managed to pick good quality, fairly classic things that I really like and won’t go out of fashion too soon. So guess what? I won’t need to buy any new clothes for awhile.

    There will be women who kick a stink with this section. Perhaps you’re even angry at me for suggesting that something as innocent and fun as clothes shopping should be denounced. I’d rather turn this on its head and not denounce fashion and beauty but say, hey, here’s an idea. Let’s invest (and by that I mean our time, our thoughts, our feelings, our money) in people, activities, ideas, political action, creativity – rather than thinking quite so much about out looks.

    And I think you’re in denial if you don’t consider this a feminist issue. When I’ve been backpacking with boys, no problem, our wake-up times sync up. But when I’ve traveled with women, I’ve literally said to them, “OK, wake me up 30 minutes after you do.” Because it takes me about 10 minutes to dress, brush my hair and teeth. But it takes them 40 minutes to think about their outfit for the day, straighten their hair, cleanse, tone and moisturise their face, apply their makeup, pluck and shave what have you, etc. Not to mention thinking throughout the day about whether everything is looking in its place. And when you add all those minutes up over a lifetime, that’s a lot of energy which could have been spent on something else.

    OK so far my little rant has probably involved a lot of negative don’ts and less ofs. But there are lots of awesome things you can do that don’t involve consumerism, and don’t involve high levels of carbon emissions. Mainly things that involve a lot of HUMAN energy expenditure. Here’s what to do with all that spare time now that you’re working, cleaning and shopping less …

    Sports, hobbies, arts and crafts Take up anything that requires a small carbon investment (e.g. buying a pair of sneakers, or a guitar – and remember always invest in quality, long-life products), but leads to high quality of life return, such as your improving your health, having fun, learning, expressing yourself, hanging out with friends and making new ones!

    Pay someone to do something Pay someone to cut your hair, clean your house, teach you the guitar, pay a band by going to their gig, pay a production group by going to the theatre, pay a group of rugby players by going to a game etc. Again, it’s better to put your money into human energy, as we emit way less carbon than machines. And this way people have jobs!

    Volunteer and get involved Choose a cause. Google. Read up on it. Join groups. I know sometimes the idea of volunteer work seems like a drag, but it’s all about finding the right group and cause for you. Eventually, when you do find your “thing”, you’ll probably find becoming part of a movement and a community is incredible! There’s nothing better in life than passion, friendship and that buzzy high from altruism.

    Do nothing much at all Sleep. Hang out with your family and friends. Go to the beach with a book. Sit in the park. And never feel stressed out again.

    A few last things I wanted to add before I go.

    You may not know this but, televisions, computers and radios use very little energy. So you don’t need to feel guilty about using them. However, as I said before, we must rail against planned obsolescence. We should demand products that are built to last, and for now I guess the best way to do that is pay extra to buy something that is high quality. Pay to get things repaired, rather than replaced. And don’t replace something unless it’s really unsalvageable. Another added note, but be wary of the mental pollution that is advertising and the cult of the celebrity.

    I haven’t touched on food or recycling, mainly because I’m sure you’ve heard it all before. But if you do want to read up on it, I highly suggest reading The Guide To Low Carbon Lifestyles, which also expands in more detail about changing your lifestyle, and some basic but necessary explanations of things like carbon, CO2, fuel, energy etc.

    And lastly, a lot of the things I sketched for you are still a pipe dream for me. I currently live at my mum’s house, and I’m about to live on university campus in Beijing, so many of these things will be impossible for me to implement. But I do hope to phase everything into my life, and learn more about what living in the future entails! Feel free to list any ideas or disagreements in the comments section.

    UPDATE: I forgot to discuss carbon pollution due to flying – probably the thing I am most guilty of, and it’s a biggie! While buying carbon offsets is no replacement for simply not flying at all, if you are going to fly, it’s better to than not. After reading this CHOICE article, I chose Climate Friendly to offset my upcoming flight to Beijing. – 24/08/09

    A written response from Mr Philip Ruddock on gay marriage

    In blog on August 19, 2009 at 10:29 am

    Over the last few years I’ve felt an ambivalence about nationalism, no doubt spurred on by numerous travels overseas. A growing awareness of the great injustices and suffering in less fortunate countries than our own, while we here in Australia grow fat in our warm, safe houses made me feel indignant. Why should I pledge allegiance to this country over all others? I am a citizen of the world, and I care about every soul on this planet, not just the Australian ones.

    But learning about the three duties Australian citizens must fulfill – duties I’ve effectively been born into – really brought it home to me. While I still very much like to believe I am a global citizen, like it or not, I am also an Australian, and that citizenship comes with certain rewards and obligations.

    And one such reward – or is it an obligation – is the ability to shape the laws of this country.

    I know this is civics 101, but it’s only recently hit me what laws really represent. They’re rules that, as a country – you, me and every other citizen -, we’ve decided to come together, create and abide by, because they make the place a safer, fairer and more prosperous place to live.

    Do I agree with all the laws? No, but out of respect to this place I abide by them because this is what the country has democratically agreed is the way we want to live. Will I also fight to change the laws I don’t agree with? YES! And thankfully, because we live in a democracy, each of us, as a citizen has the ability to be a part of that process.

    As many of you will have been following, I’ve recently been exercising my citizenship by getting in contact with my electorate MP (Mr Philip Ruddock of Berowra.) At first I simply wrote him a letter expressing my desire for marriage laws to be changed so as to allow for same-sex marriage. I didn’t receive a reply, but then I, quite accidentally, saw him at a charity event and was given the opportunity to speak to him in person.

    Following our little tete-a-tete, I resent my original letter. And yesterday I received a reply! (Click on the image below to view the large version.)

    Mr Ruddock, if you’re reading this, and to all the future young Liberals to take the Berowra seat (one of the most conservative in the country), this won’t be the last time you’ll be hearing from me. And that’s not said in a threatening way – moreover I’m simply glad to know you, and look forward to being in continual dialogue with you, as my representative in government.

    Note: I’m not entirely certain of the legality of publishing the letter. Does anyone know? As my journalist friend said his old boss used to say, “if in doubt, publish!”

    Legalised ecstacy: the true nature of consumer culture

    In blog on August 17, 2009 at 10:05 pm

    Let me share with you a little sketch:

    I am in my mid-20s, wearing nothing but black underwear, and banging out words on a laptop. A lit cigarette hangs out nonchalantly from my lips. I am thin, with great hair. To my right is a big bed with white sheets. In the bed is a devastatingly good looking guy, naked and asleep. He is a talented filmmaker/ actor/ editor. Like me, he is becoming increasingly known for his amazing work. His skinny black jeans have been thrown carelessly over a chair. We live in a spacious converted warehouse, in Surry Hills/ Brooklyn/ East London. There are many other creative types living on the other levels. Tonight we will go out and drink with them at hip bars until ungodly hours, and feel young and invincible.

    This little dream is one that had been solidifying in my brain since I was about 13 years old. A vision that, over the years, grew more and more detailed, and seemingly more and more feasible. A fantasy that I now realise, is a total

    SHAM.

    Perhaps you have a little vision like mine. It might be quite similar, or very different. But most of us will have something, and it drives so many of the choices we make: the clothes we wear, the places we hang out, the work we do, the suburb we live in, the friends we make and people we date. It is a vision that is extremely tantalising because it is imbued with feelings of being sexy, loved and powerful – feelings that Freud would say are connected to deep, irrational, unconscious desires.

    And guess what, it’s no accident that the vision is so seductive. If it wasn’t, capitalist democracy would be a smoking pile of ruins right now.

    Advertising, aided and abetted by media, film, music and fashion have been playing a huge role in the capitalist machine. According to the excellent 2002 Adam Curtis documentary The Century of the Self, modern consumerism was the brainchild of Freud’s nephew Edward Bernays.

    Bernays invented the public relations profession in the 1920s and was the first person to take Freud’s ideas to manipulate the masses. He showed American corporations how they could make people want things they didn’t need by systematically linking mass-produced goods to their unconscious desires. Bernays was one of the main architects of the modern techniques of mass-consumer persuasion, using every trick in the book, from celebrity endorsement and outrageous PR stunts, to eroticising the motorcar.

    His most notorious coup was breaking the taboo on women smoking by persuading them that cigarettes were a symbol of independence and freedom. But Bernays was convinced that this was more than just a way of selling consumer goods. It was a new political idea of how to control the masses. By satisfying the inner irrational desires that his uncle had identified, people could be made happy and thus docile.

    It was the start of the all-consuming self which has come to dominate today’s world. (Information Liberation)

    And in the last 90 years, corporations have become more and more sophisticated at manipulating us. Even back in the 60s and 70s when university students attempted to break free from the system, corporate culture proved their resilience, inventing niche markets, lifestyles – individuality through customisation. Be alternative as you want, so long as it involves consuming things to express it.

    It’s no surprise that with the demise of religion, consumer culture came rushing in to fill the moral vacuum. It’s the ultimate form of nihilism, right? Because if nothing really matters, I might as well just try and feel happy. Like, all the time. And there’s no happy drug quite like consumer culture. It’s like someone has pressed that little pleasure button in your brain, each time you buy that perfect dress, or bag that perfect apartment, or be seen strutting down Oxford Street with your oh-so-attractive friends. You’re so hot! You’re so talented! Everyone wants to know you. Everyone wants to be you. You OWN this city.

    All of us, using credit cards to chase false idols of ourselves.

    But now I want to break free. As I documented in this post, a couple of years ago my own vision began to falter. Slowly it is beginning to metamorphise into this:

    I don’t see anything. Instead I am living a life in which I am very close to my friends, family and neighbours. We have warm, loving relationships, full of joy, discovery, laughter and intimacy, and we take very good care of one another. I am an engaged citizen, in contact with my local political representatives, as I fully believe that in a democratic country such as our own, the laws should reflect the wishes of the people. I live modestly, so only need to work part-time. It is work with integrity and commitment to making the world a better place. I enjoy nature, and learning about other cultures. I like to read books, go to theatre and gigs, and see art, free of advertising and the chase for cool, and that instead says something truthful, and with sincerity.

    Good luck the capitalist system trying to exploit that dream!

    ***

    Perhaps you feel it unfair and paranoid of me to denounce capitalism the way I have. After all, are corporations not made up of people, of us? Has it not been a highly effective machine, pulling us out of poverty, making us ‘happy’, providing us with all the modern conveniences that has given me time to write this very post? And darn it, isn’t having nice things fun?

    Firstly, I wouldn’t be so critical of capitalism if it wasn’t for the fact that the environment is footing the bill. And Mother Nature is running out of steam. So clearly, this system is not sustainable. Nonetheless, maybe we don’t mind going out with a bloody bang, so long as the run-up was good times.

    So, secondly, what I don’t like is that the kind of pleasure consumer culture gives me feels really hollow, and temporary. It is just like taking an ecstasy pill. A short term high, with a bitter comedown. And you never end up feeling fulfilled. New visions replaces the last. There is this perpetual anxiety of having to forever maintain those sexy/ popular/ powerful feelings. Like an addict, you must always get fresh “hits”.

    But you know what, that’s just me. And who am I to say to everyone having a good time that they should feel differently? So at this point I’ve just decided to make personal changes – which does little for changing society as a whole.

    Even if I did want to support larger, structural changes, I’m not yet educated enough to know what they should be. I mean with my currently limited knowledge, I can’t help but feel that the alternatives don’t look good. Other nation states offer authoritarian governments in which religion or nationalism is the opiate used to control the masses. Perhaps the answer lies in a more socialist democracy, rather than a capitalist democracy. And I’m definitely interested in reading more about the economists, politicians and writers working with that ideology.

    For now, I am going to attempt to dodge the tainted brush of consumerism as best I can, in every aspect of my life, and support everything and everyone who does the same. Thankfully, I do believe society still leaves room for this. Corporate culture isn’t everywhere (yet). And perhaps, eventually, the entire thing will collapse, and from the rubble human ingenuity will come up with something more meaningful.

    Sex. A want or a need?

    In blog on August 14, 2009 at 6:38 pm

    In each of the last three nights I’ve dreamed of hooking up.

    The first dream, that kicked things off, involved a blue-eyed, 25 year old Mark-Paul Gosselaar (formerly ‘Zach’ from Saved By The Bell) – even though he is neither of those things. It was a particularly vivid dream. You know in dreams how you rarely feel things, they sort of just happen, I really FELT the kiss in this. I remember the feeling of his lips on mine, his slightly stubbly chin pressing against my face, his tongue, his warm (clothed) body.

    The dreams of the second and third nights failed to get as far as a kiss, but I knew where they were going.

    I have a feeling each were paying homage to my upcoming one year anniversary since my last kiss. Yes, an entire year has flitted by since that meaningless, pash-and-dash on the streets of Sydney with a tall, 21-year-old, blonde Brazilian guy.

    Generally I’m quite a rational person. Most of the time I try and it’s not difficult to be a reliable, honest, cheerful, not-crazy person. Nor do I let angst overwhelm me. I think things through, then act. I like to get stuff done. And this blog is more than familiar with the way I try and apply that clear-thinking approach to the lack of sex in my life. I remind myself, well there’s nothing you can do about it, so might as well dedicate your energy to something else.

    But all of that inevitably, time and time again, crumbles in the face of certain URGES. And frankly, it drives me nuts.

    These last few months, which have largely been spent traveling on a road of exciting, new intellectual pursuits, were absolutely fine and dandy. Then, recently, I met this guy who triggered all these feelings of lust to bubble up inside of me again. And no amount of rationalising could tame the beast. I didn’t want to listen to that sane part of me that told me not to prematurely blow this up to be more than what it was, or that from a philosophical point of view I shouldn’t be wildly wanting anything at all.

    The beast didn’t care about any of that, and was roaring, MAKE SOMETHING HAPPEN.

    And of course it didn’t, or I don’t think it will, and now I’m feeling very indulgently blue. Not just because I don’t have what I want, but because I let those feelings take so much control over my emotional welfare. Perhaps all that Buddhist zen or iron-clad nihilism I swore had made me invincible, was just farce after all?

    Being attracted to someone is a strange thing, isn’t it? Because you really want something very specific from this other human being. It’s almost greedy or calculative. I want you to want me. You don’t want to wish them good fortune, or to have a good day. You certainly don’t want them to be happy if it’s someone else making them happy. Maybe it shouldn’t be called love at all.

    And wanting someone to want you, is possibly one of the worst things to want in the world! Namely because the steps in which to satisfy such a want are not at all clearly defined. You’re not sure if you are what that person wants, and until you have a clear answer either way you are in limbo. The situation is unbearably tenuous. And the whole things makes you feel nervous and act inauthentically. And there’s nothing I hate more than not being myself.

    In any case, I think I’m learning to realise that my feelings are just lust. Plain, unadorned, my body speaking to me. No wonder I can’t logic my way out of this, just as you can’t logic your way out of feeling tired or hungry. My body wants to do naughty things to that body over there. And maybe, frankly, I should just listen to it.

    The other day I was looking at Maslow’s hierachy of needs. At the physiological level, the level that needs to be fulfilled before you can pay attention to the rest, there is:

    • Breathing
    • Homeostasis
    • Water
    • Sleep
    • Food
    • Sex
    • Clothing
    • Shelter

    OK so I have all of them covered but one.

    Admitting to myself that having sex is possibly just something I need, rather than want is a radical shift for me. No, this doesn’t mean I’m going to throw myself at every good looking guy that crosses my path. But it does mean I don’t romanticise those feelings when they do come along. (Guys are far more honest about their sexual “needs”.) Nor do I beat myself up for feeling down when I don’t get it. Because it doesn’t mean I’m weak, it means I’m hungry.

    The terrifying realisation nothing is holding you back *Conditions Apply

    In blog on August 12, 2009 at 10:58 am

    This is post six of a series titled: Monica’s Mind-Blowing Trip Through Existential Philosophy.

    Picking up from the last post, we have two options: 1) we can do years of meditation in order to break through and see the insubstantial nature of ‘free will’ (few of us will do this) or 2) accept our inability to let the ‘free will’ thing go, and work with it. Which brings us to our next existential themes:

    3. Angst and freedom

    Freedom is usually a word with positive connotations, but for anyone reading into existentialist philosophy it is something that can trigger a cold sweat of anxiety. Because in this context freedom doesn’t just mean you can do whatever you want, it means “you can do WHATEVER you want.” This path, or that path … the onus is completely on you. There is no one and nothing telling you you must or even should pick one over the other. Total freedom.

    When Kirkegaard, writing as Vigilius Haufniensis, wrote about this he used the example of a man standing on the edge of a tall building or cliff. And when the man looks over the edge, he not only experiences a focused fear of falling, but a terrifying impulse to throw himself intentionally off the edge. (I get this feeling sometimes when there’s oncoming traffic.)

    Of course, just because you can do whatever you want, doesn’t mean you can want whatever you want. Attempting to just spontaneously want something, or nothing, would be to deny that we have any pre-existing values. And unfortunately (or fortunately?), you do – you were brought up with them, and just because you now realise they’re completely arbitrary doesn’t wish them away.

    The existentialist concept of freedom is often misunderstood as a sort of liberum arbitrium where almost anything is possible and where values are inconsequential to choice and action. This interpretation of the concept is often related to the insistence on the absurdity of the world and the assumption that there exist no relevant or absolutely good or bad values. However, that there are no values to be found in the world in-itself does not mean that there are no values: We are usually brought up with certain values, and even though we cannot justify them ultimately, they will be “our” values.

    In Kierkegaard’s Judge Vilhelm’s account in Either/Or, making choices without allowing one’s values to confer differing values to the alternatives, is, in fact, choosing not to make a choice — to flip a coin, as it were, and to leave everything to chance. This is considered to be a refusal to live in the consequence of one’s freedom; an inauthentic existence. (Wikipedia)

    4. Facticity, authenticity and inauthenticity

    So a condition of your freedom is taking into account facticity, which are things that exist “in-itself”, things that are, rather than be. Confused? Here’s a list of things I accept as my facticity:

    • I have a body that will eventually die
    • I’m not a bird
    • Yesterday I walked to the postbox
    • I was born and raised in Sydney
    • My upbringing has led me to believe in equality
    • Sometimes I get jealous of other people
    • I feel like like I have ‘free will’

    These are things I understand about myself. Of course all of these can change (some requiring a larger mind shift than others), but for me, embracing my new found freedom (do, think, be whatever I want), and then trying to arbitrarily “turn off” these current understandings about myself would be a denial of my facticity. An attempt to simply forget what has already surfaced.

    I must stress that none of these things are immutable. For example, perhaps over time I will learn that in fact I never did get jealous of other people. Perhaps I had misread those feelings. But here, right now, I cannot just switch off that pre-conceived notion about myself, or instantaneously wish it into non-existence. That would be an “inauthentic lifestyle”. The only way to transform that understanding would be to change the way I think in a deep and meaningful, sustained way. And often that only comes about after a particularly enlightening experience, or undergoing a long journey involving greater self-awareness and knowledge.

    Which is why, taking ourselves back to that card game with Nihilism and Existentialism, although, yes, we have the freedom to now play ‘whatever we want’, there are some conditions. Namely, you must accept your facticity, and from that platform, leap into the wilderness. Even though facticity binds you to a starting point, there’s still a lot of room to move.

    Denying one’s facticity isn’t the only form of inauthenticity, however. There is the flip side, which is binding too strongly to social norms, which is,

    … a sort of “mimicry” where one acts as “One should.” How “One” should act is often determined by an image one has of how one such as oneself (say, a bank manager) acts. This image usually corresponds to some sort of social norm, but this does not mean that all acting in accordance with social norms is inauthentic: The main point is the attitude one takes to one’s own freedom and responsibility, and the extent to which one acts in accordance with this freedom. (Wikipedia)

    Let’s use my own pre-conceived notions to illustrate:

    Earlier this year I was feeling some anxiety that I was 25. It meant only 5 years to cram in a lot of living because for me 30 was a death sentence. It meant kids, husband, mortgage, stable job, no more adventures, wild partying or transient lifestyle. I mean that’s just what one does at 30, and any alternative is sad, or indicative of one’s inability to commit, get serious, be real, to make something of oneself.

    But now I see how very silly that was. That I can do whatever I want at 30, and make of it and see it as whatever I want. Nobody is forcing me to do or think anything.

    However, in this process, it would be unhelpful for me to deny that I was raised believing in these social norms. And because I was raised believing them, and for the most part many people still believe in them, it will not be easy to live alternatively. Many people around me will begin to go down that path at 30, and it will become increasingly lonely and difficult for me to not get sucked into that current. This is accepting (or being aware) of one’s facticity.

    My tete-a-tete with a former Howard hunchmen [Philip Ruddock]

    In blog on August 11, 2009 at 9:53 am

    (PICTURE COMING SOON)

    My dad is involved with this annual medical mission that performs 500 cataract surgeries in remote parts of Uncle. On Sunday evening the charity group responsible hosted a big, flashy fundraising dinner, with past and present NSW premiers, MPs and Unclese officials attending. My sister and I arrived at 6pm, only to see everyone still faffing around with photos and shmoozing, so we decided to return to her apartment just 10 minutes away, and come back later. But before we re-entered the elevator, guess who I spotted in the room? None other than Philip Ruddock, my MP.

    You may recall a previous post, in which I sent Mr Ruddock a heartfelt letter pledging my support for gay marriage. And now, here was my chance to talk to him about it in the flesh! Not only that, the night before I had dinner with one of my best friends and her boyfriend, who had advised me to contact my MP and pledge my support to an upcoming carbon emissions trading scheme bill.

    My sis and I went home, and I quickly jumped on the internet, typing in “emissions trading scheme bill Australia” into Google. The truth of the matter was I knew nothing about this bill. But I trusted my super smart friend and her boyfriend, and wasn’t about to pass up this opportunity so there was nothing for it but to do a very quick crash course in what all this was about.

    (For those of you who think it foolhardy I so quickly adopt someone else’s stance, perhaps you’re right. But as I’ve said in previous posts, one can’t be an expert at everything. And for many things, one must simply trust the knowledgeable people they have access to. Otherwise we’ll all just flounder in indecision, and nothing will get done!)

    An hour later and we were back at the dinner, eating and listening to pollies from both ends of the political spectrum take the mike. I snuck up to my Dad, who was sitting at another table.

    “Dad, can you introduce me to Philip Ruddock later?”

    My Dad eyed me suspiciously. I had told him previously of my same-sex marriage letter to Mr Ruddock. “Why?”

    “Why do you think?” I laughed.

    “No,” he replied flatly.

    “Dad, he’s my MP. If you don’t introduce me, I’ll just go up to him myself.”

    “Oh, OK then,” he conceded.

    The speeches had ended and the charity auction had begun. My dad brought me to the VIP table where Phillip Ruddock was sitting at the centre of. He had met Mr Ruddock several times previously, and introduced me to him as his daughter.

    “Hi Mr Ruddock, my name is Monica Tan and I was just wondering if you’d read the letter about same-sex marriage I’d sent you?”

    “Jog my memory,” he replied.

    I explained the letter, and how I was supporting the recent senate inquiry into a Greens amendment to the Marriage Act, which would basically allow same-sex marriage. He didn’t really know about the bill, and said that they, in the House of Reps, would probably never see it. I admitted that I realised it probably wouldn’t get passed, but as I was a member of his electorate, I just thought it important to inform him of how I felt about the matter.

    “Which suburb do you live in?” he asked suspiciously.

    “Beecroft,” I replied. And with a laugh, added my postcode, “2119″ for extra emphasis.

    A few years back, Mr Ruddock was the guy responsible for amending legislation so that the current definition of marriage stands as an institution between a man and a woman. Making iron-clad a common understanding that gays can’t marry. He reiterated this line, saying that although the government should legally recognise relationships between gay people, under no circumstance should gay people mistake what they have for a marriage.

    “But I want to go all the way with this. Let’s give them 100%, genuine marriage,” I requested.

    “Well you’re going to be very lonely with that view,” he replied.

    “Well there were 5,000 of us protesting at the National Labor Convention, so I can’t be that lonely,” I quipped. “I’ll send you the letter again. Funny, I did receive an email from your staff saying they’d passed it on to you. And, ahem, I happen to think it was a pretty great letter!”

    At this point I nervously moved onto the ETS bill. This was surely some kind of madness. Here I was, talking to a man who was once one of the most reviled figures for the Australian Left. Talking to him about gay marriage and the environment. And worst of all I was about to bring up something I was definitely not informed about.

    “And the other thing I wanted to say, is that I support the upcoming emissions trading scheme bill.”

    Now this, he was definitely aware of. His line was that although the Liberal party want to do all they can to reduce carbon emissions, it was foolhardy and pointless to promise anything the rest of the world weren’t going to do. Any kind of independent action would lead to job losses, detrimental to the country’s economy.

    “So basically you think we shouldn’t implement any changes until after Copenhagen?”

    “Exactly,” he replied.

    “But,” I struggled to recall a line from an article I’d read just hours before, “but don’t you think that to some degree Australia needs to show some leadership and come to the Climate Change conference promising something?”

    “Again, you’re going to be very lonely with that view,” he smirked.

    Suddenly we were interrupted with someone calling him to get onstage. I thanked him quickly for talking to me, and got out of the way. Later, my dad dragged him over to the table my siblings and I were sitting at for some photos. Last year Mr Ruddock had presented my brother with an award for the Australian Agricultural Industries Young Innovators and Scientists Award. I couldn’t help but feel, a little, that in this situation I was definitely the shit-stirring bad kid, and my brother the high-achieving good kid!

    Just before grinning for the cameras, I asked Mr Ruddock if I could write-up our little talk on my blog. He graciously gave me permission.

    UPDATE: A couple of days later I resent that original letter. Here is Mr Ruddock’s reply.

    The-End-Is-Nigh PARTAAAYYYY!!

    In blog on August 7, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    I was sitting on a bench in circular quay, scoffing down a rich slice of carrot cake, when suddenly a great, big seagull pounced and stole the cake right out of my hand. It dropped the cake on the floor in front of me, and began pecking at it nonchalantly. Full of indignant rage I spitefully snatched that piece of cake back. “I don’t think so!” I hollered.

    Upon reflection, I feel a terrible sense of remorse. So typical of my species. How quick we are to defend what we feel is so righteously ours. How slow we are to remember that no one can ever, truly, OWN something.

    ***

    “It’s horrible, we’re on the brink of disaster.”

    Later I was describing to my lawyer friend a previewing screening I had attended that morning, of a documentary called The Age of Stupid. According to this loud, doomsday crier, unless there’s drastic changes put into place to curb greenhouse gas emissions in the next six years, we’re all going to be utterly fucked by 2055. By then I’ll be 72 years old. Probably still breathing.

    After the seagull incident I had spent half an hour scribbling on the back of a paper bag a map of, “everything that’s wrong with the world,” and on the front, “everything that can be done to fix it.” I wanted to run the draft version by my friend.

    “OK, so you know how when you buy a toaster and then it breaks, it’s cheaper to buy a new one than get it fixed. I mean that’s crazy, right? Your toaster probably just has one little part that’s degraded. But it’s cheaper to extract new raw materials out of the ground, get an exploited third world person to assemble it in a factory and then get it shipped thousands of miles to your local Myer or whatever. ALL THAT is cheaper than paying someone in your city to do a 30 minute fix-up job.”

    “So, how about we ensure all goods are sold reflecting its true cost. The factory has to pay the third world person a reasonable wage, and provide good working conditions. Mining companies, factories and transportation companies are taxed for environmental degradation. And hike the cost of dumping things in landfill. Toasters will be a lot more expensive, but now people will demand toasters that last, and it’ll be cheaper to get it fixed than just chucking it out.”

    My friend shook her head. “It will never happen. You’d need all these fair trade laws, and it’s just in no one’s interest.”

    “Well then we’re all screwed,” I grumbled, absent-mindedly stroking a beautiful pair of soft pajama pants in the Peter Alexander store we were in.

    “Let’s go, they’ve sold out of the hot water bottle cover I was looking for,” she replied. “Great place to have an anti-consumerism rant, Monica. Look at all these things, they’re great.”

    ***

    Last night I went to the opening night of an indie art exhibition, which was being held in the foyer of the Sydney Saatchi & Saatchi office (a renowned global advertising agency.) Tonight the chairs and pool tables had been taken out, and replaced with Sydney’s young and ultra-hip, who were drinking beers, admiring the art and posing for social photographers, while a DJ spun records.

    I was talking to a young, handsome banker.

    “SO! WHAT IF, we decided we were all happy to both SPEND less and EARN less. Would the whole economy collapse?”

    “Well, it’s more that China keeps only 1/3 of what it produces. Whereas economies like the US and Australian consume 2/3 more than what it produces, so what really needs to happen is China needs to begin consuming more of its own stuff.” (OK I think that’s what he said.)

    “No, OK but wait. I have the environment in mind here, so what I’m wondering is, what if, IN TOTAL, the entire world; What if we all decided to consume less? Would the global economy collapse?”

    He thought about it for a second. “Yes. I mean that’s how capitalism works. You’re constantly finding ways of becoming more efficient, and you have to consume more and more for it to function.”

    “So we’re screwed?”

    “I guess,” he replied.

    ***

    My friend giggled as she ogled the the table next to us. In a semi-drunken stupor we had left the gallery and crossed the road to have dinner at Pancakes on the Rocks.

    “Look at them, they all look EXACTLY the same! They’re even wearing the same belt!!” she whispered. I looked over at the other table and saw four girls sitting squashed together on the couch. They were all wearing tight tops, wide leather belts, with shiny straightened hair, and faces caked with orange makeup. Across the other side of the table was a beefy guy in an equally tight top, and gelled hair.

    I looked back over at my friend and her clique of fellow artists. They were all wearing black, waist high skirts or tapered leg jeans, vintage boots, rock hair, and cultivated pale skin and ruby red lips.

    “This,” I waved a finger in the direction of her friends, “is just as much a uniform as all that,” waving my finger back at the other table. “It’s just a different genre. Each to their own.”

    “The only consistency is that we all use stuff to define ourselves.”

    I was glum, and poured myself another glass of red wine.

    By the end of dinner I was ranting again.

    “I mean that’s ALL ANYONE DOES! Everyone wants to be famous, everyone wants to be rich, everyone wants to be a SOMEBODY! You’re part of a SCENE. You embody a LIFESTYLE. Is it really a community when all anyone is doing is pimping their own name? This perpetual CHASE for a projected image of SELF. I mean sometimes I’m guilty of it too, but it makes me sick. Shouldn’t it make us sick? We’re living in a city that’s totally obsessed with TRENDS.”

    “I sure hope so!” my friend’s friend replied cheerfully. He owned a digital marketing company and could thank Sydney’s many trend-hunters for putting bread on his table.

    I rose my glass to the air. “That’s it! Let’s just live in perpetual distraction. Let’s get drunk, have sex, get our teeth whitened, buy lots of stuff. Because it’s all going down the drain anyway, and really, who cares if it happens in 40 years, 5 years, or tomorrow. At least I’ll go out gorging on feelings of being sexy, and cool, and infamous, and loooved, and boy it was SO MUCH FUN while it lasted, right?”

    I polished off the rest of the glass.

    My friend politely, but pointedly looked at the bill and said, “so I think we all owe $40?”

    ***

    There were some aspects of those stories that were tweaked. Perhaps I’ve come off sounding like a paranoid, chest-thumping, 90s-Naomi-Klein style, nutjob. But I truly AM concerned about the fact that consumerism is our religion, and it’s virtually BLASPHEMOUS to say, no, no, stop this can’t be right. And yet there’s something rotten to the core about the system.

    Everything around us has been produced, assembled and built on CHEAP ENERGY. And that black, greasy oil stinks of the blood of future generations. And perhaps not even future generations. Perhaps we will be there to witness, first hand, the rising sea levels, the hurricanes, the unnatural deserts. We will be the victims of food shortages, and bloody wars fighting over the remaining resources. Soon, we’ll be drowning (literally) in our own mistakes.

    And, on the flip side, so few care. Should we care? The universe doesn’t give a shit. The universe is silent and eternal and will do just fine with or without us, thank you very much. The earth doesn’t care either. The earth has, at one point, been molten fire, a rock of ice, a teeming planet of green life. What does it care if it’s drowned in water next, and whatever comes after that.

    OK so kind of sucks for all the plants and animals. But let’s face it, they won’t really be sad. I mean they won’t know what’s going on.

    No, the only people who are going to be sad is us. Sad that we so willfully committed suicide. Is it already too late? Are we already a lost cause? If so, what’s the point in worrying?

    So get plastered kids! It’s last drinks.

    ***

    UPDATE: And by the way, just to clarify, I think it’s human nature to like having or consuming nice stuff, and talking to each other about nice stuff. I’m sure tribal people used to make their own necklaces or hunting tools or whatever, and admire each others craftsmanship.

    My point is that the whole thing has accelerated to the point in which it’s out of control, and we have far more than we truly need. You see what oil is, is millions of years of captured energy from the sun. And in only a few HUNDRED years we’ve sucked so much of it up and burned it off, not to mention done lots of other exploitative things to the environment and the third world, in order to give us lots and lots of things, and lots of comfort and convenience, relatively cheaply. And now none of our stuff means anything to us anymore. (This kid-friendly video called “the story of stuff” does a much better job of explaining.)

    The system needs to be changed, and you should be a part of making it happen. Head to NotStupid.org and StoryOfStuff.com for ideas on how you can become involved.

    You are free! but only to do as your body tells you

    In blog on August 4, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    This is post five of a series titled: Monica’s Mind-Blowing Trip Through Existential Philosophy.

    Battling onwards with the themes of existentialism!

    2. Existence precedes essence

    A central proposition of existentialism is that existence precedes essence, which means that the actual life of the individual is what constitutes what could be called their “essence” instead of there being a predetermined essence that defines what it is to be a human. It is often claimed in this context that a person defines himself, which is often perceived as stating that we can “wish” to be something — anything, a bird, for instance — and then be it. According to most existentialist philosophers, however, this would be an inauthentic existence.

    What is meant by the statement is that a person is (1) defined only insofar as they act and (2) that they are responsible for their actions. For example, someone who acts cruelly towards other people is, by that act, defined as a cruel person. Furthermore, by this action of cruelty they themselves are responsible for their new identity (a cruel person). This is as opposed to their genes, or ‘human nature’, bearing the blame. (Wikipedia)

    I remember once when I was in high school, and no doubt troubled by typical teenage insecurities, I imagined myself having only ever lived on a desert island, without a single other soul. And I thought to myself, there, would I be funny? Dorky? Intelligent? Kind? Cruel? Without anyone to interact with, how can you ever know if you are any of these things? And if you never once ‘act’ these things, are they still a part of you?

    For the French existentialist Jean-Paul Satre (1905-1980), your essence only emerges in the act of existence. Which is to say no, your essence is not locked up inside of you like a rattling genie in a bottle. You are the sum of your actions. It is the way you live, the way you talk, the way you treat others, the things that you do, that make you. And outside of that lived life, there is no essential you.

    And Satre’s lifelong partner Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986) carried this idea into feminism, developing the idea that “one is not born a woman, but becomes one.”

    The thing is, as more work is done on the differences between the male and female brain, or looking at the way personality traits are, in actual fact, written into our genetics, not to mention hereditary mental disorders, one can’t help but wonder if some of this negates their ideas. (According to Evolutionary psychologist Nancy Etcoff in her excellent TED talk on the science of happiness, 50% of our ability to be happy is determined by genes – but there’s still 50% which is unaccounted for.)

    In fact science and psychology – particularly evolutionary psychology and social darwinism – are constantly coming up with theories that attempt to explain why we act the way we do. It seems like that long list of diverse human behaviour, that seemed to embody the creativity, the chaos, the diversity and the irrationality of humanity, is one by one being linked to ever-more complicated expressions of simple, prosaic evolution. In fact if you take this to the extreme, perhaps every single thing we humans do and think links back – somehow – to evolution.

    So in reply to the existentialists, can we be responsible for our actions? Are we actually free to choose? Or are our bodies simply driven by that primal urge to survive (Schopenhauer’s will to live), and making all the decisions for us?

    Many psychological scientists argue that the concept of “free will” is more of a philosophic issue than a scientific one, given that it is difficult to experimentally conceptualize or to empirically test. It is also largely a semantic house of mirrors: we feel free (have “free will”) when we have the capacity to choose. However, do we have the capacity to choose what we want to choose? (And, if so, can we choose what we want to want to choose, and so on…)

    Evolutionary psychology, as does psychological science in general, operates under the assumption that human behavior has causal roots. Our desires and wants, and our choices, are a complex interaction of biology and environment; we can “feel free” while our behavior is determined. (Wikipedia)

    Perhaps every aspect of humanity, from the transcendental beauty of great art, the genius behind technological innovation, to the mad irrationality of love boils down to some sort of evolutionary drive. Even somewhat counter-intuitive things like altruism and homosexuality, will some day be explained as part of a survival instinct. But where does knowing that it’s all an illusionist’s ‘trick’ get us?

    Evolution delivered us ‘free will’ – the feeling (note, just a feeling) that each of us is a unique entity, responsible for our actions and more sophisticated than just a bundle of primal, biological urges. And evolutionary psychologists may continue to uncover the mechanics behind the illusionist’s elaborate trick, but for now not enough links have been made for the spell to be broken. We will continue to be amazed by art, feel personal responsibility for the actions we’ve made, and, yes, feel like love is some kind of mystical connection between two souls.

    Sydney says “we will!”, at yesterday’s mass illegal same-sex wedding ceremony

    In blog on August 2, 2009 at 10:49 am

    After saying, "I do!"

    Here are my photos from yesterday where 65 gay couples were illegally married outside the Australian Labor Party conference. 5000 people turned up, and promised to support the gay community and their right for equality. It was a wonderful day, with the sun smiling down on us. Unfortunately inside the building the ALP did not change their anti-gay marriage stance. But there’s always next year!

    Read more about the day here, and my previous posts to learn what you can do to support gay marriage here in Australia, and why it’s so important.

    Today I called Mr Philip Ruddock to talk about gay marriage
    10 easy things YOU can do to support gay marriage in Australia
    Wake up, and demand the ban on gay marriage be lifted

    Rachel and I protest along with the 5000 others Sydney-siders. Read Rach’s write-up of the day.

    This priest who wed the couples was a great speaker.

    Journalists look down from within the convention centre.

    Removing the ‘I’ out of life [LFE?]

    In blog on July 30, 2009 at 9:59 am

    This is post four of a series titled: Monica’s Mind-Blowing Trip Through Existential Philosophy.

    Although we’ve accepted there is (or can be) value in invented meaning, despite its lack of intrinsic meaning, this doesn’t mean we simply go back to the way we were before we started thinking about all this stuff. To do so would be to deny our new-found freedom. But what to do with it and how? It was a task the existentialists dedicated themselves to.

    Let’s go through some of the concepts they wrote about:

    1. Focus on concrete existence

    Man exists in a state of distance from the world that he nonetheless remains in the midst of. This distance is what enables man to project meaning into the disinterested world of in-itselfs. This projected meaning remains fragile, constantly facing breakdown for any reason — from a tragedy to a particularly insightful moment. In such a breakdown, we are put face to face with the naked meaninglessness of the world, and the results can be devastating.

    It is in relation to the concept of the devastating awareness of meaningless that Albert Camus claimed that “there is only one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide” in his The Myth of Sisyphus. Although “prescriptions” against the possibly deleterious consequences of these kinds of encounters vary, from Kierkegaard’s religious “stage” to Camus’ insistence on persevering in spite of absurdity, the concern with helping people avoid living their lives in ways that put them in the perpetual danger of having everything meaningful break down is common to most existentialist philosophers. (Wikipedia)

    Your relationship with meaning, now that you’ve become aware that it’s projected and invented, couldn’t possibly be the same before, if you have truly believe it (which is very difficult to do. I wouldn’t at all claim it’s penetrated me to the core yet.) Here’s an example,

    Let’s say you’re an Olympic runner. And all your life you’ve felt like it was your destiny to run. It was what you were born to do! However, one evening there is a storm, and you crash your car into a tree. Your leg is damaged to the point that your Olympic career is cut prematurely short. At this point two things might happen to you:

    a. You can continue that “fantasy”* (or truth?) of there being intrinsic meaning in the universe and believe that this accident was destiny also. It happened because the universe was telling you you’re meant to do something else with your life.

    (Or for me another example are those parents who lose their child to bulimia or drugs or whatever, and then write a book or go on a speaking circuit, trying to convince kids not to go down the same path. As a way of coping with grief they begin to believe this is why their kid died, because it led to them going on the speaking tour, and saving other kids. When it actual fact the kid died because … well lots of kids die senselessly. All the time.)

    b. You realise, with a sense of despair and bitterness, that in fact you were never “meant” to do anything. The universe had never cared one ounce about getting you on that Olympic gold podium, and hence had taken it away from you without any thought or awareness of you at all. The tragedy makes you realise there’s no meaning to anything which leaves you feeling suicidal.

    Obviously the second option isn’t too good. But the first is only good if you’re steady as a rock. A brave and steely heart is required to invest so concretely in an invisible, enigmatic higher power that works in such mysterious ways, never revealing to you the plan behind all the changing circumstances that inevitably arise in life. (Religious faith may help provide that steadiness.)

    Of course, there is actually a third option.

    What if you had never assumed in the first place you were born to do anything. Your talent in running happened as a matter of circumstance: you were born with the ideal runner’s body and temperament, and given the right opportunities and upbringing. Upon the accident, you would obviously feel disappointed. But you wouldn’t feel devastated, because unlike the person in letter B, you never saw your self, or the purpose of your life as a fixed entity.

    And in actual fact, if you took this is to the nth degree, one would never feel ashamed or proud of anything one did. Because even the self has no intrinsic meaning.

    Previously I asked if you believed in a Supreme Being. But perhaps an equally pertinent question is, do you believe you have a soul? And isn’t believing one has a soul just as faith-based as believing there is a God?

    Perhaps, after all, we are just cells, carbon, atoms, just like everything else. That our feelings and thoughts are just electrical impulses. And that this mass of things that is conceptually thought of as ‘me’ or ‘Monica’ is just stuff – stuff as natural and present and perpetually rearranging and recycling as every other “stuff” in this universe.

    Of course, it’s very difficult to break down that belief in the ‘I’. Because everyone else keeps making you feel like an ‘I’. People are perpetually reaffirming the ‘I’ for you, and making you believe you are fat, skinny, weird, smart, dumb, funny, popular, vain, despicable, talented etc. when it actual fact you ARE none of these things. You are just stuff, and not a YOU at all.

    There are times where we do forget about the ‘I’. Anytime when we’re absorbed in living. Like when you’ve just completed a 3 hour trek up a mountain and you’re looking at the most stunning 360 view and no thoughts are running through your head, you’re just there, silent and in quiet awe.

    Or when you’re absorbed in work, in study, in music, in sport. Anytime when you are completely and utterly engaged in the present, and, very importantly, feeling calm, in a “zen-like state”.

    (You might be utterly engaged in an activity, but if you are simultaneously overwhelmed by emotion it remains an affirmation of self. Despair, anger, shame, pride, jealousy, vanity, fear – these all come about because you feel like something has happened or may happen to you, or you’ve done something, or you are responsible for something.)

    It is the little running commentary in your head and that great scope of intense, complicated emotion, where the ‘I’ lives. It is that which separates us from babies, animals, plants, the mountains and sky. We, unlike them, are conscious (perhaps falsely) of being. And, “this distance is what enables man to project meaning into the disinterested world of in-itselfs.”

    Removing one’s ego (the goal of Buddhism, by the way) does not mean the removal of all responsibility from one’s action. It simply means building an awareness that one’s actions are not attached to a non-existent self, but are intimately connected to everything else – to the point of dissolution.

    Perhaps you’ve already noticed that I am planning to adopt much of the Buddhist approach into my life. But I don’t want to get too sidetracked, for now let’s continue on with the Existential concepts in the next post!

    *I called it “fantasy”, but strictly speaking I wouldn’t claim FOR SURE that there isn’t intrinsic meaning, only that we don’t and probably can’t know whether it exists or not. When you don’t want to invest in absolutes, you have to begin bandying a lot of “maybes” out there!

    The meaning of (your) life

    In blog on July 29, 2009 at 9:12 am

    This is post three of a series titled: Monica’s Mind-Blowing Trip Through Existential Philosophy.

    The thing is to find a truth which is true for me, to find the idea for which I can live and die. (Wikipedia)

    So said Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) in an 1835 letter to his friend Peter Wilhelm Lund. It’s a strange idea – a “truth” that is true for me.

    After all, isn’t truth meant to be like fact – verified and indisputable? Reality. Actuality. The Truth, according to Dictionary.com, is an “ideal or fundamental reality apart from and transcending perceived experience.”

    But here Kierkegaard has transformed the concrete Truth into something far more slippery. In one sentence he has bedded it in subjectivity, brought it right back down to perceived experienced. The truth is different for every individual, as is the “meaning(s) of life”. Both truth and purpose are unstable, and completely and utterly UP TO YOU.

    And so began the time in philosophy dubbed existentialism.

    Here’s an analogy that works for me:

    You are floating – no – existing out in space, in nothingness, and you have a pack of cards. You are building a house with those cards, sometimes adding cards, sometimes removing. The shape of the house changes as you do this, but you’re not thinking too hard about it.

    Suddenly Nihilism comes along and says, “what are you doing?”

    “What does it look like I’m doing? I’m playing with these cards,” you reply.

    Nihilism is shaking its head, and grinning wickedly. “But those cards doesn’t exist. They’re all in your head.”

    Suddenly you look down and the imaginary cards have disappeared. You can’t believe all along those cards had just been in your head. Crazy!

    But now you have nothing to do, and it gets you quite depressed. Nihilism wanders away, laughing.

    Existentialism comes along and seeing you inquires, “what’s up?”

    “Nothing. I was playing with these cards, but then I realised they were totally imaginary, and now I’m pretty depressed because there’s nothing to do. Frankly, I don’t even know what I’m doing here,” you reply.

    Existentialism sits down in front of you and grabs you by the hand, full of passion. “Wasn’t it better when you were playing cards?”

    You nod glumly.

    “Well play with the imaginary cards then! Even though you know they’re imaginary, and you don’t have to play with them, existence is better if you are. So imagine them back!”

    And like a dawning sun you slowly realise Existentialism is right. Even though you’ll always be aware that the cards you’re playing with are imaginary, that doesn’t mean you can’t still enjoy playing them!!

    “And guess what?” Existentialism pips up, full of sincerity in its eyes and a warm smile on its face. “You don’t even have to play cards. You can play anything!

    Well actually we’re not completely free of all constraints. But that’s coming in another post.

    For those of you who found my story a little too optimistic, the French-Algerian writer Albert Camus (1913-1960) used this analogy in his book The Myth of Sisyphus (I’m going to write about more him later):

    In The Myth of Sisyphus, Camus uses the analogy of the Greek myth to demonstrate the futility of existence. In the myth, Sisyphus is condemned for eternity to roll a rock up a hill, but when he reaches the summit, the rock will roll to the bottom again. Camus believes that this existence is pointless but that Sisyphus ultimately finds meaning and purpose in his task, simply by continually applying himself to it. (Wikipedia)

    Believing in the honest lie

    In blog on July 28, 2009 at 11:38 am

    This is post two of a series titled: Monica’s Mind-Blowing Trip Through Existential Philosophy.

    The thing about nihilism is that everyone recognises it’s no way to live. In fact, some of the most famous philosophers to write on the subject sought to find escape hatches.

    Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900), a Prussian philosopher, is a name often associated with nihilism:

    Nietzsche claimed the ‘death’ of God would eventually lead to the loss of any universal perspective on things, and along with it any coherent sense of objective truth. Instead we would retain only our own multiple, diverse, and fluid perspectives. This view has acquired the name “perspectivism“. Alternatively, the death of God may lead beyond bare perspectivism to outright nihilism, the belief that nothing has any importance and that life lacks purpose. (Wikipedia)

    And yet Nietzsche did not consider all values of equal worth. Which is to say, just because morality is a human invention, doesn’t mean it isn’t a project worth working on. Nietzsche appreciated nihilism, but only as a stage in human development that we could one day overcome, following which we would build a new and true foundation upon which to live.

    Nietzsche saw light in a concept he called the Übermensch, which he expounded in his 1883 novel Thus Spoke Zarathustra (a book I currently have on order.)

    The Übermensch is an exercise of action and life: one must give value to their existence by behaving as if one’s very existence were a work of art. Nietzsche believed that the Übermensch “exercise” would be a necessity for human survival in the post-religious era. (Wikipedia)

    That first sentence caused a little “bing!” sound to go off in my head. After all, do we not come to a piece of art accepting of it’s own self-created reality? For example, when you listen to a piece of music, or watch a film, it is like entering a different world. And even though it’s “fictional” – that is to say creates it’s own world of logic, colour, textures, emotions etc. without any direct relationship with ‘reality’ – we are still greatly moved and emotionally invested, despite leaving our own ‘true’ world behind, during the experience of the piece.

    And perhaps that’s how we should see life. Nihilism shows us that nothing is “real” in a permanent, absolute, transcendental way. But we are living, and experiencing something, albeit for the short time that constitutes one lifetime. So why not, as in art, accept the world it is offering – admire it’s beauty, allow yourself to be moved, and experience it. Just like the mini-reality of every art piece, something is triggering us to have feelings and thoughts (LIFE!). There may be no concrete reality behind these sensations, but that does not mean we should discard those very sensations as worthless.

    Because beyond those sensations, there is nothing.

    The analogy with art only works in the sense that like our experience with art, we must see life as a contained experience. And how even with the knowledge that it is ‘untrue’, we can enjoy it and find meaning in it. What happens within the realm of that piece of art, or life, doesn’t matter in any permanent sense but you accept what you are offered and ‘go with it’, so to speak.

    However I don’t think the analogy works when trying to decide, in practical terms, how to live one’s life. That is, morality.

    How do we make choices, when we ‘know’ nothing has any inherent value. When you take away all inherent value (and in fact, all universal truth), does this not lead to a ‘nothing/anything goes’ situation. When nothing is valid, everything is valid! When everything is valid, nothing is valid. On what basis do we make decisions when deep down inside we know nothing is actually (or essentially) right, wrong, good, bad or evil? What happens when the very foundation upon which all ethics is based, suddenly has no substance?

    As with all the existentialists to follow him, there’s a high degree of paradox in the thinking of Nietzsche:

    Sometimes Nietzsche may seem to have very definite opinions on what he regards as moral or as immoral. Note, however, that one can explain Nietzsche’s moral opinions without attributing to him the claim of their truth. For Nietzsche, after all, we needn’t disregard a statement merely because it expresses something false. On the contrary, he depicts falsehood as essential for “life”. Interestingly enough, he mentions a “dishonest lie”, (discussing Wagner in The Case of Wagner) as opposed to an “honest” one, recommending further to consult Plato with regard to the latter, which should give some idea of the layers of paradox in his work.

    Which, I believe, leads us to the concept of facticity and authenticity, that can be found in the work of 20th century existentialists. But let’s leave that for another post!

    Do you believe in a Supreme Being?

    In blog on July 26, 2009 at 9:25 am

    This is post one of a series titled: Monica’s Mind-Blowing Trip Through Existential Philosophy.

    It’s one of those wonderful questions if you do, and frightening, I’d-Rather-Not-Think-About-It questions if you don’t, or you’re not sure.

    Because without God, there are no transcendental, absolute values. All values are invented. And once you’re in that territory, you’re in the terrifying realm of nihilism.

    What’s nihilism? To answer that question I do, what I always do when I’m not sure of something. I turned to the internet. In this case, Wikipedia.

    Existential nihilism argues that life is without meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value. Moral nihilists assert that morality does not exist, and subsequently there are no moral values with which to uphold a rule or to logically prefer one action over another. The term nihilism is sometimes used in association with anomie to explain the general mood of despair at a perceived pointlessness of existence that one may develop upon realizing there are no necessary norms, rules, or laws.

    ABSOLUTELY TERRIFYING!!

    If you’re not really sure what I’m talking about here, let me give you an example.

    Murder is bad.

    Most of us instinctively feel that the act of murder is intrinsically bad. That is, it has badness imbued in it. It has properties of bad. It is and always will be bad.

    But in light of a nihilistic outlook, murder is only bad because we humans say it is bad. Not because the act itself is bad, in any way. And not only that, we humans saying it’s bad is an act of total, creative invention. It’s a made-up rule that serves it’s purpose because it’s useful for our society or survival.

    In one of my previous posts I talked about the way I, almost arbitrarily, chose a life-calling; to improve the lives of the less fortunate. But from a nihilistic point of view, one would ask, well what’s the point in doing that? What’s the point in not-doing that? There is no way of discriminating between the two paths, because neither has, nor the results have, any intrinsic value.

    At the end of the day, if there is no God, there is no one to tally the results and punish/ reward us. And so aren’t all actions deduced to, does it benefit me? And even the answer to that has no intrinsic value (as in, it doesn’t matter if you benefit or not … because nothing actually matters. Our puny lives make no difference to the cold and silent, eternal universe.)

    One only has to look at the different attitudes cultures, civilizations and religions have towards sex, family, death, work, war, truth, community, the individual, politics, nature etc. to realise how diverse and inconstant perspectives are. And without faith in a higher being, no objective standard exists to judge them against. (These concepts are further explored in cultural and moral relativism, which I’ll look at in another post.)

    And of course if you take nihilism to it’s nth degree you get this …

    An extreme form of metaphysical nihilism is commonly defined as the belief that existence itself does not exist. One way of interpreting such a statement would be: It is impossible to distinguish ‘existence’ from ‘non-existence’ as there are no objective qualities, and thus a reality, that one state could possess in order to discern between the two. If one cannot discern existence from its negation, then the concept of existence has no meaning; or in other words, does not ‘exist’ in any meaningful way. ‘Meaning’ in this sense is used to argue that as existence has no higher state of reality, which is arguably its necessary and defining quality, existence itself means nothing. It could be argued that this belief, once combined with epistemological nihilism, leaves one with an all-encompassing nihilism in which nothing can be said to be real or true as such values do not exist.

    Where lies our salvation from this paralysing realisation? Never fear, two centuries of philosophers have been on the case!

    My existential journey has taken me through a forest of awesome Wikipedia pages, which I’ll write about over the next few weeks, and tag with “Monica’s Mind-Blowing Trip Through Existential Philosophy”; from Schopenhauer and Buddhism, to Camus and Absurdism!

    The importance of love for the authentic writer

    In blog on July 24, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    Translation: Sol, I love you a lot. Juan.

    I have, no less than three friends currently writing their first book. It has inspired me to consider writing something more permanent, or a little more polished than the thought-sized, quickly expiring bits of writing that feed this blog. It would be writing that requires commitment and brain-juice.

    But I am always prevented from seriously kicking off that journey by the fact that – and you’ll probably laugh at this – I’ve never been in love. And isn’t that a big chunk of life-experience to be missing?

    I have been reading a lot lately about Buddhist philosophy, nihilism and existentialism. And one can’t help but feel that in light of our utterly absurd existence, where there is no divine morality, no afterlife, no eternity, no absolute reason for our being here, one must create one’s own meaning, however human and therefore fragile and contrived, in this short time on earth.

    And in some ways one is reduced to base, animal feelings like love. There is nothing that feels better, feels so right, and has so much potential for constancy in a life that is so lacking in any.

    Sometimes, however falsely, I feel horribly alienated from everyone in my life. And is love not the simplest way of breaking through that selfish and lonely (and ultimately false!) centre-of-the-universe feeling? Is it not the strongest crutch to grab onto in a world of perpetually shifting sands?

    When you’re in love, and you share your life with someone, you suddenly know a soul with an intimacy that none of your other relationships had ever reached. Now you know what this other being likes to eat, likes to read, what they do on Sunday afternoons, their friends, their complex relationship with their family, their quirky habits, what they look like when they sleep, what they did last summer, what they’re planning on doing next summer, etc. etc.

    You might have known patches of these things about your friends and your families, but due to sheer amount of time spent together, and synchrony of your lives, there’s no complete picture quite like that of your lover’s.

    Now, you really know someone, and someone really knows you.

    I think that kind of immortality is something I try to emulate by being very frank in general, with everyone I meet, but particularly with friends and this blog (both of whom provide “safe spaces”.) It is a “decentralised love”, unlike the singular love one funnels so intensely into their partner. And at the end of the day, who is to say which will prove more of a constant?

    Value judgments aside, I do feel that the experience of being in love changes you. And that those who have never, are divided from those who have. Am I not missing a huge chunk of understanding about the human condition, having never been in love?

    And that understanding is vital if one wants to write authentically. Even if one wants to write about something other than love, that process of being in love illuminates so many other aspects of human relationships and human nature. To really know someone else, the way you do with a lover, is to really know what it’s like to think, speak and live like someone else. So important for a writer!

    And in any case, I do want to be able to write about romantic love in my stories. Not that I’m a huge fan of romance novels, or “rom coms”. In fact I feel that despite love being one of the biggest themes throughout the history of arts and culture, there’s been few texts that really revealed to me the actual texture and feeling of being or falling in love – beyond cliches.

    The only example I can think of, off the top of my head, is Before Sunset and the sequel Before Sunrise. I watched these for the first time a few months ago and was struck by the feeling that this is the first time I’ve actually witnessed two people fall in love. Most love stories or films are so carried away with the obvious, heightened emotion; the lust, the inevitable menace threatening to tear them apart, and love overcoming all other obstacles.

    These two Richard Linklater films have none of those dramatic flourishes. They simply chart the less than 24 hours a couple spend together. The second day, in the second film, is 10 years later. But in both they wander the streets of a European city, simply chatting, getting to know one another. Love here is not portrayed as love at first sight, nor strengthened by intense exchanges of declared everlasting love for one another. It is practiced by just being with someone.

    In all honesty, I won’t let this lack of experience stop me from attempting some “serious” writing. The solution is to look more intently at the people around me. In fact, I must bring the same intensity of attention, and dedication to this world I inhabit, that one would bring so naturally to a lover.

    (And anyway, perhaps a pillowcase and imagination alone are enough to fall in love!)

    Guess the three duties you must perform as an Australian citizen

    In blog on July 21, 2009 at 8:48 am

    Last night I was having dinner with my Dad and some of his colleagues, and a couple were telling me they recently passed their Australian citizenship test. They wanted to test me on one of the compulsory questions that leads to an automatic fail should you get it wrong:

    What are the three duties all Australian citizens must fulfill?

    Now I came up with one, but couldn’t think of the other two. And remember, obeying the law and paying taxes aren’t on the list because the former everyone who is the country must do, and for the latter permanent residents (or anyone legally working in the country) must do as well.

    OK the answer is after this picture of my freaky left leg, the muscles of which have degraded due to lack of use:

    1. Vote
    2. Serve jury duty
    3. Take up a gun should the need to defend the country arise.

    Call me ignorant, but I was a bit like “whaaaaa?” to that last one. It sort of triggered an image in my head of me standing on George Street with a gun in my hand, absolutely terrified, and just letting go rounds into a line of oncoming enemy soldiers.

    I checked the Australian Citizenship Test website, and it actually lists this one as:

    To defend Australia should the need arise (subject to the same rights and exemptions as Australian-born citizens)

    While service in the Australian Defence Force is voluntary, should the need arise it is vital that all Australian citizens be committed to joining together to defend the nation and its way of life. Consistent with the pledge of loyalty that new citizens make, Australian citizenship also involves broader obligations and opportunities. In particular, new citizens are asked to embrace the values of Australia. As important as the responsibilities and privileges of citizenship, these values provide the everyday guideposts for living in Australia, for participating fully in our national life and for making the most of the opportunities that Australia has to offer.

    Bit of a wishy washy explanation for what is, essentially, a pretty frightening promise.

    On a side note, I have to hand it to the government for allowing comments on every article of this site. Not all of the commenters are complimentary.

    And just to finish off, a question from their list of 20 really hard questions:

    8. Walter Lindrum
    a. disappeared while trying to cross Australia from east to west in 1848
    b. excelled on the billiards table
    c. was the only Australian general who has come close to having heroic status
    d. landed on the western side of Cape York peninsula in 1606

    I’ll stick the answer in the comments section :)

    Prince Federik; once Denmark’s biggest man-slut?

    In blog on July 20, 2009 at 10:51 am

    Recently a friend complained about how party conversations inevitably kicked off with the question, “what do you do?” She didn’t feel the answer to that question was necessarily the most accurate portrayal of a person. “After all, people are more than just their jobs,” she commented. While I agreed, I couldn’t help but think that at the same time, what you’ve chosen to do for 40 hours a week does actually say a lot about you. And if you think it doesn’t, that’s probably interesting as well.

    Another party question my friends who live overseas commonly complain about is, “where are you from?” Again, a question I am ‘guilty’ of asking anyone I talk to with an accent.

    But these are just starting points. And as I said in my last post, the areas of which you are an “expert” in, and therefore a topic upon which you’re likely to know some interesting things about.

    Last Friday I went to a party, and just by asking those two questions, discovered some fascinating things about the world:

    • In the redesigns of The State Library and the local Surry Hills library, the architecture firms had to consider a group of key users: homeless people, who use the former to go on the internet, and the latter as a great place to catch some z’s.
    • Australians waste a hella lot of water, according to someone working in water management. One of the biggest problems is that Australians like to maintain thirsty European-style gardens, rather than grow native plants which are much better suited to our dry climate.
    • India is constituted by a crazy number of different cultures, associated by region, each with their own language. My taxi driver came from the Punjab region, which is located half in India, and half in Pakistan – with nothing dividing the two but a border. He says when you’re from Punjab, you’re more Punjabi than you are Indian or Pakistani.
    • I already knew Switzerlad was split into the French, German and Italian speakers. And that in the German section they speak a derivative called Swiss-German. But I had no idea that Swiss-German is quite unofficial. It has little unity and is only spoken. All books, forms, signs etc. are written in official German. This Swiss-German was telling me that he could say one sentence to his brother in Swiss-German, and his brother could say it back to him in different Swiss-German. And Swiss-German and German are quite different, it’s not just an accent change, or a few different words. When I asked him to speak one sentence in German, and then again in Swiss-German, the two even had different sentence structure. Missing first-hand experience, I think Australians always grapple with the full extent of the world’s language diversity.
    • Denmark is becoming increasingly right-wing. When I brought up the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, in which a Danish newspaper printed cartoons which were critical of Islam and would be considered blasphemous to most Muslims, this Dane was quite eager to give me his version of events. Apparently the newspaper had a long and notorious reputation for being offensive to Muslims. The country’s moderate Muslim organisations usually chalked it up, and tolerated these offenses, but this time they decided enough was enough, and began holding public protests … which quickly led to worldwide attention. This Dane, who believes that there is a great disjunction in the West’s portrayal of Islamic culture as fanatical to reality, says that the newspaper was well aware of how much shit-stirring the cartoons would invoke. In fact being deliberately antagonistic, and raising the ire of the Muslim world was all part of the plan.
    • Back in the day, Crown Prince of Denmark Federik was a huuuuge player, and a regular fixture in the Danish nightclub scene. I was like, hangon, so he was just out and about in these nightclubs. You could freely go up to him? Yup, said this Dane. In fact he had been in the same nightclub as him several times. Which is why when the Prince married Mary, many Danish women were supremely disappointed. And not in a crazy, stalker way – but in a they-actually-had-a-shot-till-now kind of way.
    • You’d think that in communist Uncle the bureaucracy rules by iron fist across the nation. But in fact, regionalised laws and leaders still have a high degree of control, and many transactions are done off the books. For example, you slip the doctor a red packet (of money) if you want top-notch care and if you have a traffic accident, it doesn’t matter if the cop saw it happen, he’ll expect the participating parties to work out the story between them, which will become the official version of events. This was a fascinating discussion in light of the ongoing Rio Tinto case. And as this post points out, perhaps the time of “expat exceptionalism” is coming to an end.

    (As always, one should take these “facts” with a grain of salt. In many cases they’re more likely to be opinions.)

    Forget about life callings and destinies. Just pick something!

    In blog on July 16, 2009 at 9:24 am

    From 2006. A school in Xinjiang province, China that my Dad's organisation had donated money to.

    Yesterday a friend, currently doing a masters in International Relations, bemoaned to me her perpetual conversions to -isms, depending on what they were studying that week. It was driving her crazy, everyone was right, everyone was wrong. Who was she to believe?

    It’s a feeling that I get sometimes when I read one newspaper, only to be contradicted by another. Or even just having a spirited discussion between friends. How are you meant to sort out the truth from the bullshit?

    Particularly when the issue at hand is extremely complex. Look at the financial crisis. I have read a hundred pieces that all point to different things as at the heart of where it all went wrong. With each new, very convincing piece, I nod knowingly, so this is what it was! Until the next piece comes along …

    Now I have become resigned to the fact that, you can only ever be an expert in one thing, maybe two, three tops.

    And that field is likely to be your work, plus a few hobbies. When it comes to your work, you have first hand knowledge. You know the industry, you know the processes, you know the players and rules involved. You’ve read or done more research on this field than any other. You can comment on the media stories and back your opinions with actual experience! And best of all, you have an understanding of what’s true, what’s bullshit, what’s right, what’s wrong.

    As for the rest? Well there’s not a lot you can do but bring a compassionate heart, a pinch of skepticism, but mainly, as you have no choice, a high degree of trust. Just as you are an expert of one field, you must trust the experts of other fields, and the media that trust them.

    For example, local politics. I know it’s important, but I do find it very difficult to sustain any long-term interest. Perhaps though that’s OK. We can’t all be experts of everything. So every election year, I read a few articles from the Sydney Morning Herald that summarises the policy outlines from each party, and even more usefully, I look to a couple of good friends who are passionate about local politics, to fill me in.

    Inevitably, due to political leanings, or demographics, you will drift towards some titles or opinions over others, and that feeling of never being quite certain of the facts will probably never leave you. Your views will be shaky, susceptible to change, and you should unabashedly accept and confess to others with humility, that you’re not sure. I’ve accepted that loss of control, satisfied that there is at least one area that I know intimately, and can make concrete decisions of what’s right and wrong.

    (The two exceptions to this rule are jounos and politicians, who must make it their business/ expertise to know a little of everything. They’re experts at knowing who to trust.)

    So the next conundrum is, of course, but what field to become an expert at? “What should I do with my life?” another friend bemoaned. He wanted to do something good for the world, but nothing felt like “his calling”, or stood out as “his cause”. It all seemed important, but then the soupiness of it all made them seem unimportant too. What was the point in fixing this part, when that would remain broken? The world was a big, horrible mess.

    I nodded. Same for me.

    But I said to him, as I’ve said to myself, just pick something. Don’t worry if you find you don’t like it, you can change it later. Just quit the angst machine and do something, because we the world, we the universe, we need you! Now! Being busy!!

    I picked something. I want to live in a world where every soul on this planet has their human rights respected. Too many people live without shelter, without work, without education, without healthcare, without safety from violence and persecution. And I want to be involved in work that helps restore some of these rights.

    As soon as you pick something, everything else falls into place.

    I picked something, and I decided that I had to be able to speak more than one language. And that Mandarin, and Spanish would be the two most useful. So I quit my job in online entertainment journalism early this year, and headed to Argentina to learn Spanish. Now I’m going to Beijing on a one-year scholarship to learn Mandarin.

    But that’s a pretty big picture goal I have there. How, precisely, do I want to be involved in humanitarian/ development work? What are my views on the best way to lift people out of poverty?

    I realised I needed two more things. Experience and knowledge.

    Experience? After my studies, I am going to try and base myself in a developing country (probably a different part of China), and do good work. Will the company be an exact fit of the sort of work I want to do in the long run? Probably not. But that’s OK. I just need some first-hand experience in the field, in the culture. I need to get stuck in there.

    Knowledge? I’m going to research this area, and attempt to answer some of those pivotal questions that previously overwhelmed me. It is, after all, an insanely big, complicated topic. There are many different reasons why there is such an imbalance of resources between countries, with a myriad of different political, economic, technological and strategic solutions one could be involved in. And people have overthrown governments, dedicated lives, and loss them, fighting for where they stand on these issues.

    And what’s more likely than me understanding the whole picture (which is highly unlikely), is that as I drill down, I will gravitate to something more and more specific. Gravitate towards “my thing”.

    Wish me luck, as I do you!

    All the boys I’ve innocently kissed …

    In blog on July 16, 2009 at 7:37 am

    Over the weekend I spotted one of my former pashes. It had been years, he looked older, and it suited him. He was tall, tanned, fit … ah, still sexy.

    I love all my former one-night-kisses. I barely knew any of them, and never had the chance to get to know any of them. So they are frozen in time, sketched very lightly into my memory, smelling sweet, looking young, rosy and romantic. Some are them were just breathtakingly gorgeous, it sort of blows me away, even now.

    To all the boys with whom I shared just an innocent kiss; to Jonas, Christian, Sven, Dexter, Adrian, Darren, that tall boy with dark curly hair I kissed in Barcelona, the green-eyed Chilean hipster in London, the red-haired Austrian who liked my shoes, and all the other names I can’t recall … thank you!

    And I’m sure, when I’m old and grey, I’ll think again of that night when you and I were 20, and we shared a sweet kiss on that crowded dancefloor.*

    *Amazingly, yes, they ALL happened on dancefloors!

    Today I called Mr Philip Ruddock to talk about gay marriage

    In blog on July 13, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    The following is part three of a series on gay marriage. Head to part one to understand why allowing same-sex couples to marry is so important. In this post I look at what it was like to do some of the things I suggested previously to support gay marriage (which was part two).

    Today I called my MP’s office to pledge my support for gay marriage in Australia. Getting in touch with your government representative is one of the most important things you can do. After all they’re in office, largely, to represent YOU.

    I thought it particularly important I do this as I happen to live in the Berowra electorate, which means my MP is Philip Ruddock. Mr Ruddock headed up a 2004 amendment that legally defined marriage as an institution between “a man and a woman”, effectively making iron clad a commonly understood law that has never let same-sex couples marry.

    When I called the office, I politely explained that I was a member of the electorate, and would like to register my support for gay marriage. I mentioned the bill the Greens had recently entered that would make this possible, and if possible I wanted to talk with Mr Ruddock about this matter.

    The woman who answered the phone was perfectly nice, and said the MP was overseas at the moment, but she would pass the message along upon his return (my friend, rather cynically, has suggested that Mr Ruddock isn’t really “overseas” and more likely not interested in taking a call like mine). And also that my name would be added to “the list”. I also asked if it was OK that I send a letter additionally, and she said that was fine.

    It was all very easy, and not scary at all.

    Head to the Australian Equality Marriage website if you would like tips on contacting your MP.

    I backed the call up with a letter that I’m going to reproduce for you now:

    To the Hon Philip Ruddock MP,

    My name is Monica Tan, and I’m writing in support of the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2009. And as a member of your electorate, I implore you to support this bill as well.

    Last weekend, I attended the wedding of a very good friend of mine. It’s the first wedding I’ve been to of ‘my generation’, and I wasn’t sure what to expect. But as we waited for the happy couple to enter the room, friends, family and co-workers gathered together to witness these two primary school teachers begin devoting their lives together – I can assure you there were tears welling in my eyes. It was just so wonderfully moving to see the way they looked at one another that day, so filled with love. Egads it sounds so cheesy, ha, like a daytime movie special. But I guess it’s hard to impart any originality on a rite that so many have gone through, and will go through …

    Except one group of our society. One group who will be denied this important, and beautiful aspect of human life, simply because they are attracted to the same sex. It makes no sense!

    My dear friend, the primary school teacher, and her husband are not religious. They uttered no religious vow, and, like many others in this country, did not see this as a religious expression. This was a personal expression of their love and devotion to one another. Perhaps, yes, this is also a cultural tradition that was born out of a religious tradition that forbids gay people to get married. But let’s face it, for the majority of this country marriage does not have Christian connotations. And if the majority of us do not view marriage as a Christian rite, then essentially, in Australian culture marriage is not defined as a Christian rite, and therefore the laws of Christianity need not apply to a State sanctioned act. (Of course, each religion and their followers may continue to abide by their own laws, within their own churches and communities.)

    I have yet to be offered a single good reason, based on sound ethics, for why gay people should not be allowed to marry. To make the assumption that same sex relationships do not have the same elements of love, devotion and commitment, or the potential to have so once entered into as marriage, is, quite simply, discrimination.

    It is my understanding that your amendments led to a legal definition of marriage as an institution between a man and a woman, and that you believe this to be an accurate reflection of the majority of Australians’ definition of marriage. My response to this would be that yes, perhaps this is what is traditionally understood as a marriage. But more because any alternative is not current legal and therefore not practiced or common! I also feel that when really asked, most Australians are comfortable with this definition changing – “getting with the times” so to speak, and moreover, as a leader of this country you must show leadership when the right and honorable thing to do is staring you in the face, even when it’s possibly an “unpopular” thing to do.

    Please, let’s end our discriminatory laws. Let us have laws that value each and every human being as equal, and are blind to sexual orientation – which is, after all, simply a part of humanity’s diversity, and one that should not be discriminated against.

    I have attached a wide range of point-for-point reasons as to why gay people should be allowed to marry in this country, as taken from the Australian Marriage Equality website.

    Many thanks for you time. I would greatly appreciate a response.

    Sincerely, Monica Tan

    I also sent similar versions to Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard and Malcolm Turnbull.

    In addition to this I emailed the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee in regards to this new Greens bill. Any Australian citizen can send one (called a submission), and it plays a big role in the success (or failure) of the bill. Please, play your part in taking this nation forward and submit a quick and easy letter via. email. Or for the time poor, here’s an online form that makes it super easy.

    And now the most fun part of activism … wearing ribbons!

    I’ve made 30 white knot ribbons, which I’m ready to give away to those who email me their address, no matter where you are in the world. By wearing one you are showing to all your support for gay marriage. Please, only email if you’re willing to wear this more than just once or twice, and particularly on August 1, which is a national action day for same-sex marriage. (Click here for instructions on making your own ribbons.)

    10 easy things YOU can do to support gay marriage in Australia

    In blog on July 7, 2009 at 11:12 am

    Poster

    The following is part two of this post. If you would like to read about why it’s so vital we allow gay people to have the same right to marry as the rest of the country, I highly suggest reading this touching statement on the Australian Marriage Equality website. They also respond point by point to some of the anti-gay rhetoric.

    Consider this issue a real opportunity to affect change – and how often do we get to do that? Many problems of the world are so big, so complicated, they leave us feeling powerless as individuals to do anything about it. But bringing about gay marriage in Australia is relatively simple; If you want it, let the government know, and tell others to let the government know.

    And when enough do the laws will change.

    The day where gay people in Australia are allowed to marry is all but inevitable. But let’s make it happen sooner, rather than later. And let’s, with joy, become a part of that process.

    Level: Make It Quick

    1. Support the Greens bill: The ball is already rolling. Last month the Greens entered a bill called the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2009, which looks like this. If passed, gay people will finally be allowed to marry (yay!). Click here for quick and easy ways you can support this bill.

    2. Contact your MP: Make a phone call, send a letter or email, pledging your support of gay marriage. And in that order you have levels of effectiveness.

    If you’re not sure of your electorate, just use this Australian Electoral Commission search. Type in your suburb, click “find”, and in the results click the electorate name that comes up to find the name of your MP. Once you have that you can use this page to find their contact details.

    The Australian Marriage Equality website lists some great tips for what best to say when contacting your representative.

    You can also contact the dudes at the top!

    3. Join and/or donate to the AME: The Australian Marriage Equality (AME) is a national organisation working for equal marriage rights for all Australians regardless of their gender or sexuality. Join online, and membership is $40, or $20 for concession. Or donate money.

    4. Join a facebook group: Where there’s a cause, there’s facebook! The first lists some great events you can participate in.

    - Gay Marriage Rights in Australia (requires login)
    - Lets start with just 1,000 people to support Gay Marriage in Australia
    - Australian Marriage Equality

    5. Wear a white knot: Wear it every day to show your support for marriage equality. Srsly, everyone’s wearing one. Find out more about white knots here, or click here to buy one, or here to find out how to make your own.

    Level: Relatively Radical

    6. Attend the National Day of Action For Same-Sex Marriage: A national day of protest is happening on August 1, with a wonderful mass illegal wedding ceremony at Darling Harbour. Plus a march from Town Hall to Darling Harbour to protest outside the national Labor conference. Head to the Community Action Against Homophobia website, or facebook page for more details about attendance, getting involved, and registering to marry on that day. (UPDATE: My photos from the event. – 02/08/2009)

    7. Meet with your MP: A phone call is one thing, but letting your rep know in person is the best. Again the Australian Marriage Equality website lists tips on how to go about doing this. And contact them once it’s over to let them know how it went.

    Hilariously, my MP is Phillip Ruddock who in 2004 introduced a bill that specified marriage to mean the union between “a man and a woman” and is therefore a staunch advocate of keeping gays out of marriage.

    Level: Super Hardcore

    8. Get involved: The AME are looking for bright-eyed individuals to setup local branches, that can lobby local MPs and educate the community. Get in touch with them if you’re keen.

    Many of these national and state/territory lobby groups are also looking for volunteers and members.

    9. On top of these things, think about what else can be done, and start putting those ideas into action or pitching them to these lobby groups. One nutty idea I had was to use the online tool The Point, which is a pledge that those who sign make to give money or act only once the pledge has reached a certain number.

    For example, as straight, unmarried people, who do have the right to marry, we can promise that once the petition reaches 5 million, we’ll carry out our threat of refusing to get married, until that right is extended to all people of this nation.

    10. And most importantly, spread the word. Email this post around. Direct people to the AME’s case for gay marriage. Send invites to your friends from those Facebook groups you joined. Blog about it. Let’s keep this ball rolling!

    In my next post I’m going to write about what it was like to do some of the things listed here.

    Wake up, and demand the ban on gay marriage be lifted

    In blog on July 6, 2009 at 11:10 am

    Back in 1969, Time magazine wrote a piece about a quirky, little phenomenon, newly gaining the courage to point one toe out of the closet, called “homosexuality.” A largely sympathetic, more curious than condemning culture piece, it nonetheless believed that homosexuality was the result of a disturbed childhood and ended with this analysis:

    While homosexuality is a serious and sometimes crippling maladjustment, research has made clear that it is no longer necessary or morally justifiable to treat all inverts as outcasts. The challenge to American society is simultaneously to devise civilized ways of discouraging the condition and to alleviate the anguish of those who cannot be helped, or do not wish to be.

    Some historical understanding may need to be given. The American Psychiatric Association didn’t remove homosexuality from the manuals of mental disorders until 1973, with the American Psychological Association following suit in 1975.

    10 years later, in 1979, and with much changed, another Time piece on homosexuality looked into the way gays had become organised. They no longer wanted to be afraid of coming out, or barely tolerated in their gay ghettos. Gay people wanted to be accepted by the mainstream, recognised by law, and therefore had turned into a political movement.

    But as the piece points out, as the gay movement picked up steam it gained an ironic tribute, “the rise of an alarmed, organized and vehement opposition that includes fundamentalist churches.”

    It’s a time that was captured in this year’s wonderful film, ‘Milk’. Harvey Milk was an intelligent, generous, gregarious former Wall Street suit, who went on to become “the first openly gay man elected to any substantial political office in the history of the planet,” as told by Time, now in 1999. The magazine was profiling Milk as one of their “heroes and icons” in their list of The Most Important People of the Century.

    The film also depicts the work of conservative Christian singer Anita Bryant. In 1977, the passing of an ordinance that prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in a Florida county, inspired Bryant to begin a highly publicised anti-gay campaign to repeal many of the hard won gay rights ordinances across the United States. However just as the anti-gay movement was born out of the gay movement, Anita’s campaign, and the murder of Harvey Milk, inspired many more to join the fight for equality in terms of homosexuality and the law. And hopefully, many more again, in this generation, with the release of the film.

    It’s a half a century long game of tug-of-war, with both sides continually finding new recruits. Yes, there is more acceptance of homosexuality now than forty years ago, but only thanks to an anti-gay movement that continues to remain active, vigilant and organised. Because if they don’t, the other side will make overwhelming progress and possibly undo decades of hard work.

    One only has to look at last year’s Proposition 8 to find an example of this perpetual two steps forward, one step back pattern. In May 2008, a California Supreme Court case in a 4–3 decision, ruled that bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional, effectively legalising same-sex marriage for that state. It was a triumph for everyone who had fought for gay rights, and many couples did marry, including high profile lesbians Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi.

    Just six months later, on the same day the people of California voted in their new president, they also passed a new ballot proposition banning gay marriage once again. (The gay marriages consecrated during those months will continue to be recognised.) The battle for and against leading up to the vote had become the most expensive ballot measure on a social issue in the nation’s country with opponents of Prop 8 having raised $43.3 million, and supporters $39.9 million.

    And it was this decision, passed with just 52 percent of the vote, that sparked a flame in me. While I always had vague feelings of support for gay marriage, it was, I must confess, something I had never really thought about. When I heard about gay marriage originally being legalised in California, and we began seeing pictures of happy gay couples tying the knot, it simply warmed my heart.

    But with Prop 8, that happy chapter came to an abrupt and bitter end. Suddenly I had the feeling like we had been robbed of hard-earned progress. That indignation inspired in me questions I should have asked a long time ago; wait a minute, a section of our society aren’t allowed to have the same rights as the rest of society? And this is LEGAL? How can that be?

    As I’ve said previously, for me many tricky debates are a question of different definitions, or different interpretations. And both sides have strong, though opposing structures of rationale to back their feelings up. But when it comes to the question of gay marriage, the arguments of the anti-gay marriage movement are terribly thin. I won’t go into all of them. These SMH readers (second letter onwards) get stuck into it if you need any convincing.

    (UPDATE: This statement on the Australian Marriage Equality website says it best, and I found very touching. They also respond point by point to some of the anti-gay rhetoric.)

    It seems pretty obvious that all most of the flimsy excuses the anti-gay marriage movement give, are just blatant, old fashioned, unjustifiable homophobia in disguise. Which is why, unlike questions of abortion, or interfering with dictatorships, or globalisation, or how best to deal with global warming, etc., I am concrete about my views on about gay marriage.

    Which is to say, I believe EVERYONE has the right to marry, and be recognised by the State as so, no matter what their sexual orientation.

    And no, de facto relationship status, or registered relationships status are not good enough. Here in Australia, same-sex marriages are not permitted, however cohabiting same-sex couples are recognised as de facto couples, which effectively gives them the same legal entitlements and protections as a heterosexual, married couple.

    But this is not the same as a marriage. And the battle has moved to the next stage.

    As Australians, gay or straight, we should no longer tolerate living in a nation whose legislation discriminates against a section of our society. How can we be a proud of country whose homophobia has been sanctioned by the government? It is time we really made Australia the fair and just country it purports to be. Until that day, our claims of egalitarianism are nothing but hypocrisy.

    In my next post, I hope to learn and share some practical and effective ways we can fight for the legalisation of gay marriage here in Australia.

    UPDATE: I’ve decided to change the title of this post. I think the original was not only overly sensational, it didn’t reflect the majority of the post’s intention.

    How inevitable is the suburban nightmare?

    In blog on July 2, 2009 at 10:24 am

    My parents and the parents of my friends, are the lawyers, dentists, optometrists, doctors and businessmen of this world.

    When they were my age, 25, and looked into their future, they saw a well-paid job, marriage, children, a big house in the leafy suburbs of Sydney and a luxury car. Above all else they came to value material wealth and prestige.

    The children of that generation enjoyed the privilege of a private school education, and a comfortable, safe, somewhat conservative upbringing. But many also witnessed the menace that underlies suburbia: workaholic fathers more interested in becoming Very Important People than domestic life. Bored, frustrated stay-at-home mothers slowly going bat crazy. Affairs. Rising debt. Alcoholism. Bitter divorces.

    And of course the ultimate cliche, of which I know three examples in my close circle: fathers remarrying much younger wives, while the mother, middle-aged and therefore expired, alone in her big house. Her sanity is being slowly eaten away by those left-over feelings of devotion to her husband (she had trained herself to be so) and her incredible, burning hatred of him (she can’t believe she supported him all those years, only to be traded in for a younger model).

    But I am not my parents. Perhaps my upbringing has led me to take certain things for granted, and perhaps many more things I react against. Important to me is spirituality, intellectualism, creativity, Big Ideas (rather than Big People), discovery, internationalism, freedom, truth, romance, friendship and community. And too few of these things flower in the stifling burbs of Sydney’s north-shore.

    Don’t get me wrong there are many wonderful things about a suburban upbringing. But there is also much in that picture I do not want for my own future. And yet having witnessed nothing else, I truly know no other.

    Recently a friend introduced me to ‘Tete-a-Tete: The Tumultuous Lives and Loves of Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre’, by Hazel Rowley. I razed through the book like an addict.

    Finally, paths which were without ‘respectability’ and yet so rich, so dynamic, so meaningful! They would spend hours and hours writing or conversing about new philosophical concepts in the cafes of Paris. They traveled. They were politically engaged. Disinterested in material wealth. Had ménage à trois love affairs. Had lifelong friendships. And lived in a community; the existential intellectuals of their day.

    And oh yes, their day was the 1930s-70s. Simone De Beauvoir was my age 76 years ago, and yet even today her life would be considered brilliantly unconventional.

    Yes, like all they had their fair share of tragedy and dysfunction. And no, I don’t consider an ‘open marriage’ the answer to my problems. My point is not that I wish to look to the lives of these two as a road map for my own. Simply how wonderful to ‘witness’, to finally know what ONE alternative looks like. That a life without marriage or kids need not be sad spinsterhood, or the superficiality of DINKs.

    Another alternative I’d like to offer is my aunt. She is a Buddhist nun, and probably the most joyful person I know. She is always busy, active in her religious community, and striving for spiritual fulfillment. During this, my recovery, I have begun to read more and appreciate Buddhist philosophy.

    Do I believe it possible for me to stay true to the values I listed previously, with marriage and kids in the picture? Walk a path that need not end in a ‘Revolutionary Road’ style tragedy? (Perhaps April and Frank would have become friends with Satre and Beauvoir had they made it to Paris.)

    I believe so. And yet is this not an easy slippery slope to go down?

    Kids are expensive, so are mortgages.
    So you get that job which isn’t really the meaningful work you were hoping to do, but it pays well.
    You also move out of the inner-city into the suburbs because it’s cheaper.
    Kids are time consuming too.
    So you see your friends less, you abandon your creative hobbies, and you leave that exciting, young community you were a part of.
    The only travel you can do are quick two week holidays every year or so.
    Time moves on.
    You begin to hate your job.
    You resent your kids and your partner.
    You’ve lost many of your friends.
    Hello, suburban nightmare.

    Tips for travelers injured overseas

    In blog on June 30, 2009 at 11:15 am

    A friend of a friend recently wrote to me, asking for advice as he was currently in a similar predicament to mine two months ago: suffering a serious injury in a foreign country. Fingers crossed you won’t need to call on this in the future!

    Before you leave

    Buy travel insurance! Buying travel insurance buys peace of mind. You don’t want to be lying in a foreign hospital in pieces, telling doctors to push back on tests or treatments because you can’t afford to pay.

    Be sure your travel insurance allows for unlimited costs when it comes to accidents, for the reason above. Looking after your health should be the number one reason for buying insurance, so if it doesn’t provide that better to look for another policy.

    I didn’t bring my bulky travel insurance booklet/ policy with me, but I did pack the one-page travel insurance certificate, which had my policy number, a brief summary of what my policy covered and most importantly the toll-free number I could call to report my accident. If you’re really diligent you’ll also copy and paste this document into your email, so that if your stuff gets stolen you can access it there. Double points if you do the same for your policy.

    This last one is optional, but I would have found handy. On a piece of paper that you should carry in your wallet, write your name (first and last), your nationality, passport number, travel insurance company, blood type, and any allergies you have, particularly to any medicines. This was the information the hospital was after, and if you’re in a non-English speaking country it may very well be easier to show them this piece of paper than nurses having to mime “allergy”.

    At the time of your accident

    Poor you! First piece of advice, stay calm. Are you in a developing country? Don’t assume the healthcare system sucks, you may be (if you’re lucky) pleasantly surprised, particularly in countries more socialist than our own. And if you’re in a non-English speaking country, try not to get too frustrated, and be patient. After all you’re the one who doesn’t speak their language, not the other way around.

    If the police get involved ask an officer for a police report, detailing the accident. Also ask your doctor for a medical report. Be sure it is on hospital letterhead, and includes the date of the accident, the injuries suffered, and their advice regarding treatment and whether you’re fit to travel. Also ask your doc if they mind giving you their contact details so that should you find later on you need to clarify anything.

    If your injury doesn’t require any further treatment beyond that day, be sure to also take home any x-rays, or scans that were taken. These are yours, and may be useful if you find there are complications down the line.

    From the moment of your injury, keep every single receipt of anything you pay for. Later when you get home, you can check exactly what your policy allows you to claim, but at the very least it should include treatment, tests, medicine and travel costs.

    This is a strange one, and may depend on your insurance company, but I wished I’d paid everything with card not cash. When I did my claims, I put in my bank statement, and my insurance company paid exactly the amount that turned up on my statement – including any foreign currency conversion fees! This way you won’t get gipped if the Australian dollar gains between the time of your accident and the claim, or lose out on charges for withdrawing cash overseas (a cost that I couldn’t claim.)

    Returning to your hotel

    Call your insurance company. If yours was anything like mine, they will have provided a toll-free number that can be called from anywhere in the world. When you call it’s best to have the following details: your policy number or customer number, which should be on your travel insurance certificate, and an address and telephone number you can be reached on. Check with your hotel if you can give their details for the last two.

    The insurance company will set up a case file for you, and put you through with their medical team (their own doctors) to talk about the accident, the injuries sustained and the treatment received. If you’re in a non-English speaking country this is a great opportunity to check that the treatment correlates with what you would have received in Australia, and any further questions you have that was too difficult to ask at the hospital, or was possibly lost in translation.

    If you’re asking about medicine, read to them the generic drug name – which will be same across most of the globe, rather than the brand name given by the drug company – which often differs country to country. E.g. Panadol is the drug name, “paracetamol” is the generic drug name.

    Did you have to alter your travel plans due to the injury?

    You should be able to claim much of the costs of any pre-booked travel plans, just check with your policy. However if plane tickets are involved your insurance company will probably ask that you attempt to get a refund through the airline first.

    In my case, although I was not due to fly on the day of the accident, I was not fit to fly on the day I was to leave on my side trip to Spain. But when I called the airline, they said that I could only get a refund if I called 6 hours prior to the flight, and was in the hospital on that day! Luckily I did have an appointment as part of my ongoing treatment on the day of the flight, so I called them the morning of the flight and said I had to go to the hospital that day so I couldn’t fly.

    In the evening I emailed them a doctor’s certificate verifying this, and received a full refund on this flight.

    Does your injury require ongoing treatment?

    Things get a bit more complicated now, and what’s best to do depends on your injury, treatment, trip and policy. It’s something that you will probably work out with your insurance company, and if you have your full policy booklet in your email read the whole thing now!

    So here I’ll just give some handy tips that the insurance company may not share with you as it’s not in their interest.

  • Your insurance company will probably ask that you attend one of the hospitals in your city that has been vetted by them. And I think it’s a good idea to do so, as those hospitals will be up to Australian healthcare grade. However, if you have a hospital you want to go to – perhaps a local friend has advised you – you can explain this to the insurance company, who may then offer to have that hospital vetted.
  • If you have friends in a different city who can take care of you, or you feel you will receive better treatment in a different city, your policy should cover any costs incurred with traveling there. Just check with your insurance company in your calls with them.
  • You may be able to claim any accommodation or food costs if the injury has altered your travel plans in any way. Again just stick with my blanket suggestion – keep ALL receipts! And then check your policy at home when you’re doing your claims.
  • Stay or go home? Remember, the insurance company’s number one goal is to only get you fit enough so that you can fly. As soon as you land on Australian shores the government takes responsibility of your health.
  • My insurance company were quite explicit that if surgery would be involved in my treatment their plan would be to fly me home as soon as the doctor said I was stable enough to do so, so that the surgery could be carried out in Australia. However, they reluctantly admitted that if my doc said the injury demanded immediate attention and couldn’t wait for me to be fit to fly, they would cover this treatment in Argentina.

    Another thing to take into consideration is how long your trip is for. Even if you do have to fly home for treatment, my policy covered costs for a flight back to the holiday, if there was at least one month remaining of the trip. It’s details like these that makes having your full policy booklet in your email useful. I wouldn’t trust the person on the line from your insurance company to tell or know all these details.

    If it is necessary for you to fly home, your insurance company should arrange and pay for that flight. Be sure to check they organise anything extra your injury may require. My injury meant I had to have my foot elevated for the length of the flight, so I had to fly business class, and receive hotel assistance and hotel transfers.

    The last thing to note is that even if the accident happens on the second last day of your trip, and your policy expires the day after, so long as the accident happens during the time of the policy, they must pay all costs incurred by the injury until the day your doctor deems you fit to fly home, and you do so. For example, I was forced to stay in Buenos Aires two weeks after my policy expired, because my Doctor had not deemed me fit to fly. But I was still covered for costs related to the injury because the accident happened during policy coverage.

    Making your claim

    Once you return to Australia you will probably find a letter from your insurance company asking that you send in all your receipts, certificates and other supporting material.

    The package I sent them included

  • All the receipts, plus a list recording each, the foreign currency exchange fees that went with any of them, and their amounts
  • Police report, doctor’s letters/reports, any prescriptions I had kept
  • Bank statements
  • Travel insurance certificate
  • My plane tickets/receipt of a side trip to Spain that I had to cancel due to the injury. Although I received a refund for these tickets from the airline, I had lost $90 due to changes in the dollar. My insurance company could refund me half of this money.
  • I kept photocopies of everything I sent them, and thanks to the list, knew roughly how much I expected to be refunded.

    A few weeks later an agent from the company emailed me back with a list of everything they were willing to refund me (practically everything!) and the amounts for each item. I doubled checked that they had recorded and added correctly, and approved it. A week later I had a cheque come through the mail, yay!

    If you have any additional tips, add them in the comment section.

    ‘Not-looking’: the strategy for love so many swear by

    In blog on June 26, 2009 at 10:52 am

    My gorgeous friend sighed with a twist of ecstasy when I asked how things were going with her boyfriend. At 8 months, her longest relationship. Suddenly the conversation flipped to me.

    “That’s how I know it’s going to happen to you now! You know what the key is? You’ve got to NOT be looking for it? Remember that day we were at the races? I wasn’t expecting anything to happen that day and then I met him.”

    I firmly replied with the line that I tell every person who insists it’s a matter of ‘not looking’.

    “But I’m never looking for it, so that can’t be true.”

    I’m never quite sure what the implication is when someone advices you to not-look. Does the act of looking actually repel love? What if it was subtle looking? Do you still give off that whiff of desperation which results to the love of your life going, “nope, not for me?” And by following their advice, and consciously choosing to not-look in the hope that one will fall in love – well doesn’t that mean you are kind of looking?

    Or is it a matter of cosmic irony? Just as she least expected it …

    In any case, what I said was true. I am almost always not-looking. Or should I say hardly ever looking. Perhaps, I will confess, there have been times my little heart has lifted with an inkling of hope. But at least 95% of my existence has been spent not-looking for love. And not once, in either the 95% of the time I’ve been not-looking, or that 5% that I possibly have, have I fallen in love.

    And that day at the races? Falling in love, or even picking up was the last thing on my mind. Yet in the end she found her future boyfriend, and I chatted to a pretty damn cute guy who turned out to be gay. Go figure.

    “It’s all luck,” I added.

    Perhaps now you’re thinking the problem is that I am never looking. There’s another piece of advice: You’ve got to put yourself out there.

    I like to think I’m pretty open and gregarious to everyone I meet, whether I’m attracted to them or not. The kind of person who is driven further into conversation when I recognise the potential for friendship, rather than a hook-up? Would I trade in this person for someone who is supreme at the art of seduction and has several notches – be they dates, hook-ups or boyfriends – on her belt?

    Nope. And I’m trying not to make any value judgments as to which is the better kind of person to be. My point is that it’s OK to be me – someone who doesn’t have sex, who doesn’t date, and who has never been in love, just as it’s OK to be the kind of person who goes through the exciting but often emotionally draining dramas of dating. Or just as it’s OK to be a person in a loving relationship.

    This is me. And not requiring improvement (at least in this area.)

    It sounds terrible to define myself in the ‘absence of’ like that: “who doesn’t have ….” And yes, there is an element of feeling like you’re missing out on something. I wouldn’t mind having love, at some point. Yes I enjoy sex and kissing and touching. But if getting those things requires me to ‘play the field’ – which for me, being so unaccustomed comes out as disingenuous as ‘networking’, or attempt to trick the cosmic, ironic universe, then love, dating and all that jazz is not something I want.

    And if that means a lifetime of not having it. So be it.

    There are so many, many, many other things I would rather channel my energy into, before acquiring dating skills. The life I have now – single and sexless (well sex without someone else’s participation, ha!) – is it so bad? No, in fact it’s not only bearable, it’s awesome.

    Occasionally I do become blue about being single. (I’d say, on average, for a couple of weeks every six months – still a very small minority of the time). And no doubt some of you reading this have been privy to the way I like to play up my perpetual singleness. The thing is, I want to stop all that. Because I think, when I do get bogged down like that, it’s better not to indulge. In fact it’s quite against my nature to mull over these elements in my life that I have sacrificed control of.

    It’s much better, in fact, to say to me: hey, instead of fruitlessly wishing you could fall in love, why don’t you take all that pent-up sexual-romantic-frustration, and direct it to answering the question, how can you love the people already in your life, even more? Because trust me, those friends and family need it more than your completely abstract, non-existent problems.

    Who you gonna call? (And are your friends on that list?)

    In blog on June 25, 2009 at 11:10 am

    When the chips are down, who’s really there for you?

    It’s a question Kylie and I were discussing, and the answer should have been obvious. After all, Kylie is the friend who nursed me for two whole weeks in Buenos Aires, following my accident. (Read the last post for that story.)

    And for many of you reading this perhaps the answer is obvious.

    Well duh, my parents. Of course most of you are young enough that your parents could look after you, and live in the same country. But what about my mum, whose father passed away many years ago, and whose mother is very elderly and lives in Malaysia? It’s an eventual, possible scenario for me too, as I make my plans to live overseas.

    OK it’s still duh, what about her husband? Well, my parents are divorced, and I think my mum would rather ask help from the postman than my dad and his new wife. And let’s face it, if my track record is anything to go by, marriage is not a sure thing in my life.

    Well JESUS, you say, what about you, her child. OK so in this instance I am the one who would look after her. But lucky I’m old enough to look after her, and that she had kids at all. As I said previously, marriage and kids is no sure thing in my life.

    And if you don’t have a husband, and you don’t have kids (the new family), and you’re living in a different country to your parents and siblings (the old family) can you rely on your friends in the city you are living in? Would they get out of bed at 4 in the morning to take you to the emergency hospital? Would they invite you to their home and nurse you for 3 months if your foot was busted?

    It’s a question that is pertinent to Kylie who is single and living in a different country to her family and a question this wonderful blogger put to her audience.

    At the heart and soul of the question is exposing the depth of your friendships. Is it unconditional love, made up of mutual support and responsibility? Or is it more a case of fun, accompaniment … convenience?

    I thanked Kylie profusely for her help those two weeks, but she shrugged it off with typical humility, “you would do the same for me.” Which is true (although like I said to her, that doesn’t take away from what an amazing thing she’s done for me.) But months later as I was talking about the topic with her, I wondered if it was easier for us to find friends “who would” now while we were young and almost all of them aren’t married or with kids. What happens in 10 years time when most of our good friends will be married and have young kids to look after?

    I like to believe that I will always take Kylie in, no matter what my familial status is. That what I have is hers. And I have a few friends with whom I have that kind of relationship. But truth is, I don’t really know. In fact I won’t really know until the chips actually go down, and you see which friends pull through for you. And that’s where the crucial difference lies.

    With family, and your partner, you know. With friends, you must ask.

    As you might have noticed before I grouped husband/kids as “new family” and parents/siblings as “old family.” As the perpetually single person in my group of friends, I have learned not to resent my friends when I see them less because they’ve started dating someone. The best way to see it is that new guy in their life represents the possibility of the “new family”. And he is going, or possibly going to give her something I can never: the promise of concrete, unconditional love.

    Don’t get me wrong, some of my friendships are extraordinarily close. But with your best friend, if you find out she wants to move to, let’s say, Rawanda. Do you automatically begin having that conversation if you should move too? The answer is “no”, but the answer for a boyfriend/ girlfriend is “yes”.

    Pilgrim Soul has a unique proposition to this modern day dilemma:

    I am calling for a destabilization of the rules that surround who we can and should be able to rely on in this culture. That, like it or not, does involve removing the family from its current position at either the top of the pyramid or the center of the Venn diagram (take your pick of visual metaphors) of your treasured personal relationships. And I think the best way for us to encourage this is to advocate the changing of the law to allow people to choose anyone, regardless of affiliation to themselves, to enter into a legally recognized relationship of mutual support.

    It’s a nice idea, marrying a best friend. (And as the comments in that post show, does exist in some places, including, apparently Tasmania.) But for me, I can’t help but think that for a lot of people, even if you were to enter one of these platonic marriages, the number one spot will always be reserved for that special someone. And if that special someone comes along, can that first marriage really be maintained, at its original intensity?

    For me this whole issue is connected to a social construct I’ve always had a problem with: the nuclear family. Let’s face it, it doesn’t work. How do I know that? Look at the insanely high divorce rate. Look at my family. It’s ridiculous to expect one mum, and one dad, to carry all that pressure of earning all the dough, and keeping all the members happy.

    Sometimes I wish we could go back to the days of old. Like back when we use to live in tribes and the entire tribe would raise the next generation of children. Then it wouldn’t even really matter if you didn’t have kids, there would always be kids around for you to help raise.

    Or if we can’t do that, to at least go back to Jane Austen style village life, where everyone took care of each other. The mornings were spent calling on each other’s homes, asking about each other’s business. When Mrs So-and-so was sick everybody would bring fresh eggs, or homemade cake. Everybody would visit the Whoevers when there was a new baby. I mean geez, I had been back for two months before a neighbour dropped by (and even then it was to tell us our tap was leaking.)

    Yes, this is a question of community. If we still lived in tight communities this need to get married, and quickly breed your own support system, wouldn’t be so pertinent. If we implicitly knew the entire neighbourhood would be ready to shoulder the responsibility of care, we’d probably have a whole lot less angst about who would be there for us. (And no one would have to worry about “dying alone”.)

    So … anyone want to start commune?

    The kindness of friends, new and old

    In blog on June 25, 2009 at 10:55 am

    Yesterday I brought you a rather heart-warming tale of my selfless mother, but today I wanted to dedicate some space to a few other people who helped me out since the accident.

    To give you some back story, it happened in Mendoza, about 14 hours away from Argentina’s main city, Buenos Aires. On this particular day I was doing what many tourists do in Mendoza: going on a “wine and bike” tour, with a bunch of friends I’d made at my hostel.

    Sounds like a dangerous combination right? The thing is, we hadn’t even bicycled to the first winery – so I hadn’t had a drop to drink – before I ploughed straight into the truck. What can I say … I’m just really, really bad at riding. As I lay down on the road, screaming at the sight of my muscle peering back at me through the giant rip in my foot, my friends came to my rescue and comforted me as we waited for an ambulance.

    Three of those friends, just days into our acquaintance, accompanied me through the 7 hours I spent at the hospital getting x-rayed and stitched up. They helped me buy medicine and crutches, and shared their hostel-cooked dinner later that evening. The kindness of (virtual) strangers is amazing.

    But the next day I faced a daunting day alone. I dreaded the idea of having to hobble on my crutches down to the busy main street, somehow hail down a taxi, go to the police station to file a medical report, head to the hospital again for a bandage change, get back to the hostel (and tackle the many stairs there) and even more dubiously find some food. All in a country where I spoke barely any Spanish.

    I couldn’t sleep that night from the stress (and the pain). I kept imagining falling down onto my foot, which was already seeping blood into the bandage. Never had I felt so very alone.

    Thankfully the next day one of my friends from the day before, Jenna, offered to sacrifice yet another day from her holiday to accompany me (my phrasing, not hers). With some guilt, and a lot of relief I accepted her help, even though the day before I had insisted that I would be fine by myself.

    But I couldn’t endlessly rely on these backpackers. Clearly I had to get back to Buenos Aires where one of my oldest and best friends lived. There was just a 14 hour bus ride standing in my way.

    Up to this point I hadn’t cried once. But halfway into the bus journey, with my foot dripping into a plastic bag that I had stuffed with tissue paper to absorb all the blood, it all became too much. I managed to get it together a couple of hours before Buenos Aires, but as soon as I got off the bus, and saw Kylie standing right there, waiting to pick me up, I began bawling, bawling, bawling again.

    I had this immense sense of relief seeing her, and I think in anticipation on the bus. I didn’t have to keep it together anymore, I could just cry and without guilt, let this dear old friend help me.

    And what an absolute angel she was. For the next two weeks I settled into my little nest, that was her couch with all my belongings in arms-reach. She would cook delicious meals for me, put on the bath for me (with loving smelling bath salts), pick-up my medicine from the pharmacy, and when she could she accompany me to the hospital. And juggling this with work and university.

    But when it became clear to the doctors that the recovery time would be months, not weeks, I knew I had to go home. Even though Kylie insisted I wasn’t a burden, she loved having me stay, the fact of the matter was it simply wasn’t fair on her, when the person at home who could look after me (mum) neither worked nor studied.

    And let’s face it, if I felt less guilt as I transferred from hostel friends to Kylie (a very good, long-time friend), there’s even less guilt when you transfer to your family.

    But should it be like that?

    Love is a perfectly edited piece of toast

    In blog on June 24, 2009 at 10:52 am

    I am so glad I slammed my bicycle into a fast-moving semi-trailer two months ago.

    Despite the fact that I had to have 30 stitches and a skin graft on my very damaged foot, which, will never look the same again. Despite the fact that I had to cancel my trip to Spain and return home to Sydney. Despite the fact that it’s meant 2 months of staying at home, hobbling on crutches. Despite all of this, I am so unbelievably grateful it happened because it meant one thing:

    I’ve realised my mum loves me.

    Most of us, sort of implicitly know our parents love us. But there are less of us who are really close to our parents, who are friends with them, and do get to experience that rush of love. I don’t fall into that category of the lucky.

    My mum rarely shows much emotion. Nor is she much of a conversationalist, and we share very few interests. Often (almost always) we seem to see the world in completely different ways. So I had always read into the lack of intimacy in our relationship as a very poor sign. Were we to forevermore be these alienated beings, living side by side, never connecting?

    But perhaps I was wrong, or confused.

    In these last couple of months in which I’ve been recovering my mum has tirelessly cared for me; bringing me meals to my room, driving me to doctor’s appointments, washing my clothes and reminding me to do my foot exercises. All without a word of complaint, or any hint that she’s at all sick of it.

    And for me this expression of unconditional love was crystallised in my breakfast yesterday morning.

    You see the day before my mum brought me breakfast and apologised for how the toast was burnt. Apparently the slice was too long so it couldn’t go in the toaster length ways. But when she toasted it sidewards, there was so much sticking out at the top, she thought she’d re-toast it again upside down, but which consequently burnt it.

    The next day’s bread was toasted to perfection. As I bit into it, slathered in peanut butter and honey (my favourite), I realised she had carefully cut off two of the ends so now the bread had fit into the toaster. Beautiful.

    My time here has made me realise that I had been looking for my mother’s love in all the wrong places. Her love can’t be found in non-existent kisses and cuddles, or long conversation. But in the way she has cooked, cleaned, driven us around, and just generally cared for us and been there for us kids, all these many years. Even in the sometimes wise, sometimes crazy nagging, has been love.

    Similarly, I had been looking to express my love for her in all the wrong ways. She doesn’t want to talk (she doesn’t understand anything in my life, it’s all nonsensical to her), she doesn’t want me to take over the household chores, she doesn’t want to hear my lectures about various problems in her life. All she wants is an obedient and respectful daughter. I can handle that.

    And I have also remembered one piece of common ground … craft! When I was in school I use to love doing craft. Ever year I had a new thing I was interested in; friendship bands, beaded jewelry, cross-stitch and so-on. It was the one interest my mum and I shared. The one thing we could talk about and she could depart her expertise.

    And despite the fact that in my later years of school and post-school I lost interest in craft, my mum would continue to buy me books on scrap-booking, or painting watercolours, or making Christmas decorations. She would take me to school fetes and quietly appreciate the homemade craft and amateur art (but rarely did she buy anything for herself). And the only present from me where she really seemed excited was this elephant cross-stitch I made, and that my sister sewed onto a pillow.

    With nothing to do all day these last couple of months, my mum encouraged me to take up knitting. At first I was reluctant – my first attempt many years ago seemed to prove it was not something I had a natural ability with. But I gave it another go and am now onto my fourth scarf! Mum’s even shown me some more elaborate stitch patterns which I’m about to get stuck into.

    This whole experience has taught me that you can’t always expect things in your life to follow convention. And sometimes it can still be alright when they don’t.

    For a truly wonderful look at the complicated relationship between sons and fathers, listen to this heartbreaking episode called “Go Ask Your Father”, from radio show “This American Life”. From the website you have to pay, but if you email me I can send you a copy.

    Abortion: a question of how you feel about fetuses

    In blog on June 23, 2009 at 11:24 am

    The world’s most fiery debates are so for a reason: they’re complicated and/or the ethics involved are not clear cut.

    Take abortion. I believe abortion should be legal, but I understand where some anti-abortionists are coming from.

    An anti-abortionist would argue that from the moment of conception, the fetus is a life of its own. And just as a mother cannot kill her baby, a mother has no right to kill this life. There is no logical argument of ethics that I can bring up to counter this.

    Australian ethicist Peter Singer says in his book “Practical Ethics” that, “if we make the comparison with a fetus of less than three months, a fish would shore more signs of consciousness.” And suggests, “we accord the life of a fetus no greater value than the life of a nonhuman animal at a similar level of rationality, self-consciousness, awareness, capacity to feel, etc. Since no fetus is a person, no fetus has the same claim to life as a person.”

    And you wouldn’t tell a woman it’s illegal to kill her fish.

    However this, like all definitions of what is a human life (and what isn’t) is still arbitrary. And one that I believe will always have blurry lines. So MY feeling that the mother does have the right to abort is not really a solid argument of logic – I simply feel differently about the fetus at those first weeks of term, than anti-abortionists do.

    That is not to say I like abortion. Having once had my period come a couple weeks late, during those weeks of not knowing I began to worry about that possibility, and considering the options came to the realisation that I myself could never have an abortion. (No doubt the fact that I come from a family who have the capacity to support me and the baby financially has a huge impact on that stance. Not to mention live in a country where I won’t be executed for being pregnant out of wedlock.)

    Nevertheless my feeling, and the emphasis really is on feeling, is that the mother has the right to draw that line, not society.

    All in all, my views on abortion are not absolute enough to join that fight (I am far more firm when it comes to supporting all programs and laws that try to reduce unplanned pregnancies and aid poor mothers.)

    There are other debates, however, that I am more concrete on. Hopefully those will determine the decisions I make in my life, particularly when it comes to work. Over the next few posts I’m going to have a look at some of them.

    1. Australia is NOT egalitarian! [rage against the gay marriage ban]

    Check out The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart three part measured and thoughtful debate on abortion with Mike Huckabee, and this one-page summary from the BBC of the ethics around abortion, or this comprehensive look.

    And I acknowledge this is an extremely controversial topic, of which I am not an expert. So I invite you to share your own opinions below, so long as it’s done in a spirit of openness, respect and constructive discussion.

    Why all coke-snorting party people have blood on their hands

    In blog on June 18, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    OK that’s a picture of my cousin with a can of coke, but of course today I want to talk about this kind of coke.

    I’m sure many of you reading this have tried it, at some point, if not regularly now. After all, it’s the drug du jour here in Sydney.

    But by snorting that line or two after a few too many drinks on a Friday night, you are immediately and intimately linking yourself to a violent and bloody world of:

    • organised crime (a tidy word for trigger-happy gangsters and contract killers)
    • terrorism
    • the weapons industry
    • police and government corruption
    • contributing to deforestation and
    • the degradation of communities and indigenous tribes

    The majority of the world’s cocaine is produced in Colombia, something like 80%, (followed by Bolivia and Peru). And the country has been mired by a four-decade-old war, in which the country’s guerrilla groups have the rural poor by the throat, and fund their terrorist activities with the money from cocaine production. Yes, the money you paid your coke for.

    I can’t stress what a cancerous plight cocaine is on the country of Colombia. Have a look at these distressing statistics:

    3 million people have been forcibly displaced, a number that is second only to Sudan. Read this to hear the heartbreaking tale of the Wounaan Indians, who were forced at gunpoint to produce coca leaf (which is eventually turned into cocaine) by rebel groups.

    Although the production brought lucrative profits, along came drinking and prostitution as well. However, when “leaders in Union-Wounaan, the largest settlement, sent word to the guerrillas that their coca-grow-ing days were over. A day later guerrillas seized a teacher from his classroom. His mutilated body was found hours later. The next day a tribal leader was seized and beaten to death”.

    700, the number of hostages the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, (FARC) have, and let’s not forget last year’s rescue of French Colombian politician Ingrid Betancourt, who was held for six years in the wet jungles. Assassinations, disappearances and murders are all part of the game for these guerrilla groups.

    900 civilian deaths in 2008 due to land mines, which are used to protect crops and processing labs.

    4.4 square metres of valuable rainforest destroyed for every 1 gram of cocaine snorted, or

    2.2m hectares of the Colombian Amazon forest cleared to grow coca in 20 years. It is estimated that it will take between 100 and 600 years for just 1 hectare to recover. Deforestation also leads to global warming and extinction of flora and fauna. Also consider river water pollution due to agrochemicals (coca grower use 10x more than growers of legal crops). (See the guardian’s gallery on Colombia’s “ecocide”).

    And for me, this is the kicker …

    3,000 people killed each year in Colombia’s “Cocaine War” (although some put that number up to 17,000 murders a year!) I want you to really imagine that. Take a football field. Fill it up with 3,000 people, imagine their faces, their names. A few of them are young boys just 11 or 12 years old seduced up by the glamor of the gangster, others innocent civilians at the wrong place, wrong time. And now imagine each of them being shot dead. That’s what’s happening in Colombia, EVERY YEAR.

    And then let’s throw in the drug addiction and prostitution, which has destroyed countless more lives, in both developing and the developed world.

    Now I realise dismantling the drug industry isn’t all that’s required. One needs to make growing legal crops a lucrative option for farmers, and give both rural and urban poor opportunity so their only alternatives aren’t simply work hard all your life yet remain poor, or the live fast-die young lifestyle of drug dealing or terrorist organisations.

    But on a personal level, after reading this, how do you feel about buying drugs? Let me put it to you in another way.

    If you knew there was an 80% chance, or even a 50% chance, that the diamond you wanted to buy was a blood diamond, would you buy it? Well that coke in front of you, the chance that somewhere along the line someone’s life was taken, destroyed or exploited, would be somewhere up in the 99% range. That entire criminal underworld kept alive on all the money being circulated between players, used to buy weapons that kill? That’s your money.

    I’ve talked mainly about cocaine here, as I’ve just returned from South America, plus recently watched a documentary made by Alex James, the bassist of Blur. A story came out in which he admitted to having spent 1 million pounds on cocaine during the height of his party days. Following which the VP of Colombia invited the now organic-cheese farmer, to his country to see the devastation the drug has wreaked.

    So yeah, that’s the insidious back story to cocaine, but other drugs have similar stories to tell.

    On a recent episode of The Daily Show I learned about certain districts of Afghanistan where there is no government or military presence, the Taliban have imposed the cultivation of opium (from which heroin is derived) which is funding the costs of weapons and arms for their insurgency. Which means heroin that was being sold here in Australia, was helping to fund the very people our troops were fighting against.

    The fact of the matter is that drugs – including ecstasy, cannabis, amphetamines – are illegal. And while they are illegal that means they are probably being produced and imported from developing countries (including in Africa and Asia, check out this gallery for all the global trafficking routes) because only there are the people poor and desperate enough for this high risk game. And while it’s an illicit operation, there are no laws protecting the farmers from extortion, or the factory workers from inhumane working conditions, the natural land from being destroyed, or all those at the bottom of the drug world food chain from being murdered in urban warfare.

    (The use of the word “war” is not over-sensationalising. Watch the excellent film City of God, set in the slums of Brazil, plus the documentary on the DVD, for a look into that terrifying world. Or read about the recent Mexican drug wars).

    Remember, there is no such thing as ‘fair trade’ drugs!

    Would love to hear your thoughts on this.

    Female boners (they’re complicated)

    In blog on June 16, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    I was close to what you'd call obsessed with the owner of this Argentine hostel. But he barely said four words to me during the three days we were there.

    There’s a guy here in Sydney, I’ve only spoken to once or twice, but who I have a big ass crush on. (In fact most of my crushes are like that). The most apt description I can give of my feelings towards him, is that when I’m around him, or even think of him, I feel like a complete and utter nerd trying to hide a giant boner behind my notebook, (a la Romy & Michelle’s High School Reunion.)

    A crude description, but there’s no other that perfectly captures both the overwhelming, physical attraction to him, and how intimidated I am by his superior looks, dress sense and overall embodiment of cool.

    The recent teen phenomenon, the Twilight novel series, must owe at least part of its success to the way that at the core of the book is an ordinary girl’s powerful attraction to an incredibly sexy guy – something which is so, sadly, rarely portrayed in our media and art. (Unlike vice versa, which is everywhere everywhere all the time).

    Having read the first book, and I’m not a huge fan frankly, the most redeeming feature was the way main character Bella’s obsession with her vampire amour Edward, reflected much of my own many, hundreds probably, of previous crushes.

    While I don’t want to speak on behalf of the entire straight, female population, it has been my experience with the women in my life, that their attraction to a guy isn’t pure sex. It’s not like how it is with a guy, where the sight of tits, or ass, or pussy can set you off.

    For these girls it is a complicated mix of being attracted to his face, his arms and torso, his general figure, his smell, his voice, what he says, what he does, how he walks, how he dresses and what he thinks of you. It’s no one thing. And there’s no ability to separate the physical feelings of being turned on, with the emotional feelings of a romantic crush.

    Physicality does play a part, a big part! But for me, I don’t get turned on by, let’s say, gay male pornography. Which is a lot like straight male pornography: fully nude, oily, photoshopped bodies in straight up, titillating, sexual poses.

    My pornography is more likely to be a guy fashion magazine, or teen pop mag. (Or the men’s section of a modeling agency website.) I like my beautiful guys in context, wearing clothes, and showing personality. Or when it comes to film I’d be more turned on by the sex scene of a feature film (having become emotionally invested in the characters), than by porno porno.

    Can you list any other books/ films/ articles/ music with great depictions of a woman’s attraction to a guy that you can identify with?

    Am I genetically predisposed to horrible bike accidents?

    In blog on June 4, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    I think there’s a good chance I may have a genetic deficiency when it comes to bike-riding.

    My visiting uncle was telling me about my other uncle who lives in Sabah, Malaysia. Two years ago he had a horrifying accident in which like me, he rode his bike (in his case a motorcycle) into a fast-moving truck. However his injuries were far worse than mine.

    Not only did he break the top half of his left leg, the bottom half of his right leg was completely torn open. The skin and muscle ripped up, and the bones in shards. He was in a coma for several days after the accident, and the doctors told his family they should prepare for the worse.

    Thankfully he survived, but has spent the last 1.5 years in hospital! As his bones painfully grow back, he has had countless operations, and has not been allowed to move from the bed all all, during all those months. His legs are permanently set in a giant, metal brace. And there is pain, all the time.

    He has recently been allowed to return home, but he is still bed-ridden, and likely to be so for a couple more years.

    I was deeply shocked. My father had told me about the accident, but I had no idea how bad it was.

    Being a patient isn’t easy. It’s entirely unnatural to be lying on your back 24/7. Day in day out. Week after week. Month after month. Your entire universe has shrunk to the space enclosed in four walls. Your work life, your social life, your outdoor life? Say goodbye to them all.

    And you’re so, incredibly, dependent! You are in a perpetual state of gratefulness, to the family members and friends who must do everything for you, cleaning, cooking, shopping, and keeping you company. You hate having to meekly begin every second sentence with, “can you please do me a favour?” and when the answer is no, there’s absolutely nothing you can do about it. (Such as the way my mother is keeping ALL sweets away from me at the moment.)

    I am not suffering at the moment, other than an insane itch I’m not allowed to scratch, at the wound on my upper thigh where they took undamaged skin to graft to my foot. I’m not even bored, in fact I’m quite busy having set myself Spanish homework each day. I have also been reading books, practicing meditation and knitting! But for me, the end is nigh, I believe I only have a few more weeks left, so the total recovery time will be just over two months.

    But I can’t imagine what it’s like for my uncle. Apparently he’s often in a temper, and I can understand why. I think it’d be hard not to go mad after such a prolonged ordeal!

    Oh yeah and when I ran the theory, that we’re genetically BAD with BIKES, by my brother, he confessed that last December while he was living in Japan he fell off his bicycle. I was like “SEE?!!” He said, “yeah, but I was drunk. I was riding home, and then I closed my eyes for a bit, and suddenly swerved off the road and crashed.”

    It’s official. TANS are simply not meant to be on bikes.

    Should I tell people they’re gorgeous?

    In blog on May 8, 2009 at 9:12 pm

    Please note this picture did not do the doctor's hotness any justice.

    In Mendoza, when my foot was being stitched together there were eight or nine young, student doctors looking on during the procedure, and I was quite amazed at how bloody good-looking they were – boys and girls! I decided to tell them, in my awkward Spanish. They laughed, embarrassed, but thanked me. And I mean, porque no?

    The next day I had to come into the hospital for a bandage redress and there were two attending doctors. Pointing and looking at me from the doorway, one said to the other in English (for my benefit), “she’s very beautiful, no?” And I mean, what the hell, it made me feel good. And it was said so frankly, without sleaze or bad intentions, just a positive observation shared out loud.

    You see I didn’t really care if those gorgeous, young student doctors found me attractive. I didn’t admit those thoughts because I wanted it to go anywhere. I said them because they seemed like nice, humble, good people, who deserved to realise how nice their faces were. It’s quite irrespective of me.

    (By the same token that doctor didn’t care, or need to wait and see if I found him attractive before making such a comment. His intentions weren’t to ‘pick me up’. So it wasn’t even relevant if I found him butt ugly or not … which, ahem, he certainly wasn’t.)

    I want to continue being honest like that, and I think it does take a level of confidence to be so forthright. Perhaps confidence isn’t the right word – what I mean is, comfortability with oneself. You need to be able to not worry about how the person might react – your heart lies completely in the act of giving.

    The examples I’ve given so far relate to physical attractiveness, but it needn’t be. One can extend this to all sorts of compliments or declarations. The only qualification is that it must be said sincerely. There should be no ulterior motive, you shouldn’t want or expect anything to come from this action. And it shouldn’t be expected, it’s not the same kind of compliment that you might give to someone who’s asking you for your opinion, or when you’re trying to comfort someone who’s disappointed.

    No the kind of compliments I’m talking about should be more like a thought that bubbles up in your heart, and you’re so overwhelmed by it that you simply must share it! Even though there’s the danger that they will cast a cynical eye, and wonder if you’re trying to hit on them, or feel uncomfortable because they don’t have the same level of affection towards you. That danger is there, but isn’t important when you come from a place of giving.

    When you come from the place of giving you don’t expect or need or care if you get anything in return. With pleasure you give your free gift, and simply hope the person will recognise it for what it is – it is totally innocent – and accept graciously.

    Three months of speaking Spanish will do this to you

    In blog on May 7, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    Monica says: (8:34:37 AM)
    they’re cupcakes are so much more elabourate
    Monica says: (8:35:12 AM)
    they’re?
    Monica says: (8:35:13 AM)
    their
    Monica says: (8:35:23 AM)
    i think my english hasn’t degraded
    Monica says: (8:35:27 AM)
    ha!!!
    Monica says: (8:35:28 AM)
    HAS
    Monica says: (8:35:30 AM)
    HAS DEGRADED
    Monica says: (8:35:31 AM)
    see
    sam says: (8:38:44 AM)
    ahaha
    sam says: (8:39:12 AM)
    that is so funny, because in a recent episode of 30 rock salma hayek’s character joked that she couldnt speak english anymore since she’d spent “the last two monthses” speaking spanish
    Monica says: (8:40:07 AM)
    omg that me literally lol
    Monica says: (8:40:12 AM)
    oh SHIT
    Monica says: (8:40:15 AM)
    MADE ME
    Monica says: (8:40:27 AM)
    maybe its the painkillers too
    sam says: (8:42:46 AM)
    youve gone all paula abdul on us

    New Monica; still not shaving my armpits, now sporting bad ass brusies

    In blog on May 3, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    As my time here in Argentina draws to an abrupt close, I thought some reflection on the last three months was in order. Especially as there isn’t a lot more I can do these days than sit, reflect, and write. (And perhaps fantasize about gorgeous Argentine ice-cream delivery boys).

    • Monica here tries to cook;
    • Monica here is gradually improving at speaking another language;
    • Monica here plays tennis, hikes and rides bicycles (sort of);
    • Monica here eats fruit;
    • Monica here is friends with boys, as evenly as she is girls.

    Those who know me will realise the big-dealedness of this. That wasn’t a “stuff I never previously had time to do” list. That was a list of things I had convinced myself that I was bad at, or wouldn’t or couldn’t enjoy. Argentina was a chance to quit berating myself for being the kind of person who wasn’t comfortable with those normal, dooey things, and instead just do them.

    And yes, it’s pretty damn hilarious that two of these very ordinary activities came close to KILLING ME, nearly justifying why I’d avoided them all these years. But the truth is I have no regrets in trying them all and will continue culturing most in my life (BUT DEF. NO MORE BICYCLES!!!!)

    In order to make room for this Monica, some of long-standing Monica had to go – or at least be neatly tucked away for another day. Internet Monica; celebrity-pop-culture-obsessed Monica; music-fashion-hipster Monica.

    (Of course that Monica will be back, but perhaps a strange new hybrid? Alas some elements are banished to the history books: my feelings for Kanye have abated! New American friends introduced me to more hip-hop so I have moved onto other artists. And I haven’t been paying attention to the celebrity sphere, thereby starving, killing?, my Kanye-habit.)

    And the most important change in me, is more a blossoming of – the seed of which was planted at least a year ago while I was working my trashy, corporate media job. Back then, my desire to work in developing countries, wanting Change, wanting a world that’s just, and in which poverty is an exception rather than a rule; went from vague to increasingly strong.

    And here in Argentina, at my language school and during the month that I hit the road, quite unexpectedly I met a lot of inspirational young people who are doing exactly the kind of work that I hope to move into. Few have stable jobs yet, but most had or were doing volunteer work in sustainable development, work co-operatives, eco-farms, microcredit, politics and NGOS. They had studied politics, sociology, international relations, philosophy, literature, or finance.

    It was such a pleasure to get to know these people: a new generation of intelligent, opinionated, engaged, adventurous, multi-lingual, fun, witty, deeply cynical but never without hope world citizens. And to see that they had taken my growing impulses and made it their reality was exciting.

    I’m not sure why such a high proportion of people I met here fell somewhere in these categories. I guess the kind of people who decide to travel or study in Argentina, particularly Southern Argentina which is a mecca for adventure-sports types, often turn out to be these kind of people. (This certainly wasn’t my experience with travelers I met in South-East Asia or Europe.)

    I’m more certain now than ever that this is the direction I want my life to take, and have more concrete ideas of how to make this happen. And of course keeping up that momentum while I spend the next couple of months indoors, recuperating, living on my strange, nestlike, hermit island, will be the next challenge!

    I would very much like to order one hot guy to pash, home-delivered please!

    In blog on May 1, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    I’m not going to talk about that thing that happened to me, (that most of you already know about anyway) because I’m not yet in the safe zone health-wise. So I’m not really ready to turn the ordeal into an amusing blog-worthy anecdote.

    For now all you have to know is that I am utterly housebound, and have been so for the past week. In fact it would be more accurate to say that where I am is Kylie’s (lovely, and gloriously stair-free) apartment and Hospital Britanico, rather than Buenos Aires. I only ever see the city in passing through my taxi window as I make my way from the apartment to the hospital or back again.

    Kylie has been an absolute god-send; making sure I’m completely comfortable, making my bath, cooking me delicious meals, supporting me emotionally as I howl and cry through a pain-session, accompanying me to the hospital when she has a day free, and then just generally being such a fun, lovely person to be around. The world would be a much happier place if every person had a friend like her.

    Lately, however, there’s been one thing I’ve been craving that Kylie definitely can’t provide: A PASH FROM A HOT GUY.

    Of course even while I was mobile, pashes from hot guys were rare to come by. Not even being in a country filled with famously forward Latin lovers improved my chances. Not even hitting the road this last month and meeting more new people than I have in two years helped. Nope, the last pash was before this trip, in Sydney, 9 goddamn months ago.

    And it’s May, right? That’s the 4 YEAR ANNIVERSARY of the last time I’ve had sex.

    So yeah, not getting any action now, isn’t that different from not getting action from before. But at least before there was the potential for me to hook up. Now with my involuntary hermit existence there’s no hope!

    “Man, I wish I could just order a hot guy to come over and pash me. There really needs to be some sort of home-delivery service like that,” I grumbled to Kylie.

    “Kind of like with the ice-cream?” she replied. Here in Buenos Aires you can get ice-cream home-delivered, until very late in the evening!

    “OMG imagine if they combined the two? A hot guy delivers your ice-cream and for an extra fee you get a pash as well!” I proposed, ecstatically. And you could pick the boy just as you’d pick the ice-cream flavour!

    However Kylie wanted to give another word for it. Prostitution. And truth is, when I actually picture it, I wouldn’t want a hot guy who wasn’t into me being paid to pash me. I want a hot guy who’s really into me wanting to pash me free of charge. (Maybe someone who finds leg braces sexy.)

    You’ve never seen me like this (and probably never will again)

    In blog on April 12, 2009 at 7:58 pm

    Midway on a 25km trek. Seven hours of scrambling up and down rocky mountain faces as the rain came down non-stop. And after all that the main attraction was shrouded in clouds. I nursed aches and pains for two days later. Safe to say an experience I'll never forget!

    Adventure Girl

    Last night over a bottle of wine a few fellow backpackers and I shared stories in the common area of our hostel. Two, in particular, struck me.

    The young New Yorker told me of a forty-something traveler who had seen much of the world on the back of a motorcycle. Whenever he ran out of money he would work for three or four years as a physics teacher in an international school; he’d done so in Papau New Gineau, Switzerland and New Zealand.

    The young New Yorker, though impressed, confessed he didn’t really like the man. When I pushed for reasons he replied, simply, “he wasn’t a very nice guy.” Firstly, he was derogatory to the “shitty kids” he taught (one can’t help but feel for the kids who get this dude as their teacher). Secondly, he was a bit sleazy. Thirdly, there was an arrogance about him that was evident when he bragged about his exploits – conscious of how impressive his tales of travels were.

    And lastly, in more general terms, he seemed selfish. He didn’t care about anyone. He didn’t have anyone. The only person he thought about satisfying was himself.

    This led the blue-eyed Swiss girl to tell us of a gutsy, nineteen-year-old woman she had met in her previous hostel. The teenager had spent three months living with a cannibal tribe in the wilderness of Papau New Guinea.

    At some point she asked some local seamen to drop her off on an island. She drew in the sand four suns and moons, in an attempt to ask that they pick her up in four days. After four days, with food and water supplies dwindling, the boat didn’t show up. On day six there was a storm, and still no boat.

    She twisted together palm fronds in order to catch rainwater. Previously someone had shown her how to climb coconut trees – now was a good a time as any to try those skills out. Up she’d go, and clunk, she’d fall before she could reach the top. Again and again she would try.

    Eventually a boat passed by, and she yelled and jumped up and down, waving. Lucky for her she was rescued.

    When she returned to civilisation she found the experience so overwhelming she checked herself into a 10 day silent meditation camp in order to calm down. Now she was here in Argentina, and with rented boots, walking through snow for the first time. She was delighted by the experience.

    I was weirdly moved by the story of this young woman, but also somewhat disapproving. “That was incredibly irresponsible!” was my initial reaction to the tale of the island troubles.

    Sure, half of me was deeply impressed by the girl’s chutzpah, and willingness to throw herself into the deep end. She was experiencing an authenticity most backpackers can only dream of – and will only ever dream of. These days all paths are too well carved to be anything but safe, santised, that dreaded word “touristy”. Yet here she was, in the midst of a honest to god adventure.

    But the other half of me found her behaviour to be reckless, naive and almost arrogant. “It’s so typical for a middle-class, young Westerner to think the world is their playground, and they can just go in, invincible, do as they please and come out unharmed.” The teenager reminded me a lot of Christopher McCandless from Into The Wild. He too rejected society, and entered the wilderness with little knowledge – and therefore, in my opinion, little respect – with devastating results.

    “Ah, but she’s Mexican!” the Swiss girl countered, “not from the West!”

    OK. But clearly she’s a pretty well off Mexican if she has no responsibilities to her family, or community, and can instead jet set around the world, doing as she pleases. (The Swiss went on to say her father was dead, and her mother was a painter.)

    Earlier in March I met a guy at my Spanish school – a young, nineteen year old American from Tennessee. One evening at a group dinner he said he was jealous of homeless people because “they only have to think of themselves.” Although crudely said, I think what he was trying to articulate was that there is something seductive about that solitary, nomadic life. For some, living in a society with all the complications, expectations and responsibilities that entails, is just too much to handle. And some would argue, distracts one from the true essence of being alive.

    But I wouldn’t agree with those people. I think the essence of life is born out of our relationships with one another. Being a part of something. Feeling like you’re important to others, and that you’re making a useful contribution. Real, lasting happiness, the kind of contentment that has longevity, comes from when you do something for someone else, not for yourself. And whether that’s for people you know in real life – your friends, family and co-workers – or in a more abstract way the people we are connected to through markets, nations, communities, scenes and so on.

    So when it came down to it, I wasn’t that impressed by this young woman. I am impressed by stories of real connection. And real connection requires time, hard work and love. Had the teenager decided to stay in PNG, living and working as part of the tribe, learning the language, making friends, falling in love, contributing to the life of the community, over the course of a decade … that would have truly impressed me.

    But of course, she is nineteen; still footloose, and wide-eyed (and it seems wonderfully crazy). Let’s just hope that she doesn’t become the man in the first story – or die in the process.

    I am going to fall in love this month

    In blog on April 9, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    Earlier in the day ...

    How do I know this? Because I have hit the road, traveling Argentina for the month of April. And backpacking is a bit like speed dating – you meet a lot of people in a short amount of time.

    On Tuesday, my first evening of the trip, I met a stunning, young German guy at my hostel. He looked a bit like this.

    I half considered an offer to join his group on a five day camping and trekking expedition in Southern Chile. But the likely reality -

    Me unfit and incompetent at surviving in the wilderness. He gay/ taken/ gay and taken.

    - that impelled me to defer, hasn’t prevented me from fantasising about the possible parallel-world-me -

    Me super incredible, sexy outdoorsy Adventure Girl. He falls desperately and unconditionally in love with me.

    I am currently writing this post in a diary as I sit in a bookstore cafe in El Chalten. There are two incredibly good-looking Argentine guys working here. There is one with serious, beautiful blue-green eyes, that I am particularly fond of. He makes me want to stay and look at him forever.

    I am going to leave a message for him in my empty teapot: “TU ES MUY LINDO.” (“You are very beautiful.”) (And I did.) (Edit: SHIT, I think it should have been “VOS SOS MUY LINDO.”)

    I love how this world is filled with gorgeous creatures like him! I wish I had a little GPS which kept tabs on all of them; little blue dots appearing on a map, telling me where to find each, instead of becoming lost to time.

    I can’t wait to fall in love with one of them.

    Update: No it didn’t happen. And I pretty much forgot about thinking it might the day after this. – 26/06/09

    How can you be HARDCORE in Spanish?

    In blog on April 8, 2009 at 9:37 am

    A few weeks ago I was obsessed with finding the translation for “that’s hardcore!” in Spanish. I would ask every new Spanish speaking person I met. It felt important to me because it’s something I’d say in English, so how I could be myself in Spanish unless I knew how to say it?

    The closest I came was “!hostia! !que fuerte!” – a phrase that’s not really spoken outside of Spain, and kind of means, “that’s some heavy shit.”

    It’s not really a direct translation, and I’ve given up in finding one. Most of the people I asked would tell me there isn’t really a way to say “that’s hardcore!” in Spanish, which happens sometimes. At first I didn’t believe them. I mean what happens when a Spanish-speaking person sees something really intense, how do they express that feeling?

    Well as Kylie explained, they don’t feel the exact same thing, although they might feel something close to.

    Many people talk about how they almost become a different person in another language, or different aspect of their personality shines through. Perhaps in one you’re more flirtatious, in another more serious, in another more individualistic. And language provides cues to how a culture expects you to behave.

    Life hasn’t been very hardcore here. I have many of the things I have in Sydney; sunshine, cafe culture, films, bookstores, nightclubs, restaurants … and friends to enjoy these things with. And that’s made for a very pleasant two months.

    There’s only one aspect in which I would like to turn up the “hardcore dial”; and that is speaking Spanish. I don’t seem to do that much of it. I know some basic Spanish to see me through the day when it comes to purchasing things, but otherwise, with everyone I’m hanging out with, it’s just hours and hours of conversation in English.

    There are things I can do to rectify this – things that I’m going to do. Because learning Spanish is very important to me. It is the main reason I’m here. And not only is it important to me, I enjoy it! I have begun to like practising it, and working on it, like one would work on any hobby, craft or sport. And my good exam marks was a little confidence booster – a reminder that I can be good at this, if I put in the hard work.

    Guess who killed in her Spanish exams?

    In blog on March 27, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    95/100 for written and oral!

    Power to the people!

    In blog on March 25, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    Yesterday I ended up at the annual protests during the country’s public holiday commemorating the thousands that disappeared during the dictatorship. All these different leftist parties walk down Av. de Mayo, with thousands more looking on. There are so many people and parties this takes half a day.

    As always at protests, I felt very moved. The communal emotion that is emitted from a mob is mind-blowingly strong. Almost like a physical field you can touch. And I couldn’t believe how many politically conscious passionate people had come out, young and old. As usual I felt frustrated that I couldn’t understand the speeches and slogans, but as I was still high from yesterday’s encouraging interaction, rather than being depressed I felt more determined than ever to become fluent in this language.

    Political consciousness is much more part of the culture here in South America than it is in Australia. Little niggling thoughts of staying here for an extended period, getting my Spanish to the point where I can finally connect with the culture and people, and learn about the social revolutions in these countries, have begun to pop up in my brain.

    Also, remember when I mentioned I don’t like taking pictures of hot guys face on when I’m walking the street? No such problem today as it looked like I was just taking photos of the crowd! Enjoy …

    The one on the far left!

    More pics from the protest after the jump:

    Read the rest of this entry »

    Estoy hablando espanol!

    In blog on March 25, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    My feelings towards learning Spanish tend to see-saw.

    The last couples of weeks I’ve been hanging out a lot with English-speaking foreigners, lazily sticking to English with my Argentine flatmate and coming to class hungover and despondent.

    I was on the verge of giving up. Little angry storm clouds had gathered around my head: Spanish sucks. This is boring. What’s the point? Guess I’ll always be one of those crap, ignorant, arrogant Westerners who can only speak English.

    But on Monday night, in a bar with classmates, I found myself in a group containing a non-English speaking Ecuadorian, so her French friend asked us to speak in Spanish.

    And to my delight I discovered words and phrases coming out of mouth that I didn’t know I knew. Suddenly I realised that I had improved. That unwittingly I had been absorbing these last few weeks. And the payoff? I was marginally better at communicating with this person I would have otherwise not been able to speak with at all.

    Thanks to my rudimentary skills, I found out that she had moved to Buenos Aires to study orthodontics. There was a secondary but just as important reason – her heart had been broken. After two happy years, her boyfriend had dumped her. She didn’t know why. Was he scared of commitment? (I commented that at 28 he was too old to behave like that). Or was it another woman?

    After months of moping at home depressed, her mother told her she needed a change of scene. Hence now she was living in Buenos Aires and having a great time. :)

    A graphic representation of why I’ve never been in love

    In blog on March 23, 2009 at 11:15 am

    Madrid 2005, I stole a kiss from a statue

    Part of my schtick is highlighting the fact that I’ve never been in love. Never even had a boyfriend.

    I like to talk about it a lot. I like to tell people who I’ve known for all of five minutes. It has become part of my psyche: “I am an expert at not being in love.”

    My love life is always a source of hilariousness because it is made up of shadows and missed opportunities. So many unspoken crushes. So many fantasy relationships. Too much eye-flirting and friendly acquaintances. Not enough kissing, holding hands or real conversation.

    The last guy I had a crush on in Sydney turned out to be gay. Another recent opportunity failed to convert and ended disastrously with something so bizarre, and black-comedy that one can’t help but laugh.

    I explained to a friend here how I see it. Falling in love isn’t a skill. I’m not a social retard. I’m not unloveable. I’m just unlucky.

    You see we all have about five people in our lives we could possibly fall in love with (totally arbitrary number, replace with what you will). Why someone falls into this group, and another doesn’t, is totally inexplicable. There’s just this gut feeling that makes you decide you want to be with one, and not this other one.

    It is pure luck that we end up crossing paths with those five people. And unfortunately all the guys I’ve met have realised I am not one of these five. It’s not because I’m unattractive, boring, weird etc. I just, for some indefinable reason, am not in that very small group of people that they feel they can go down that road with.

    Most people end up crossing paths with at least one, if not two, of the five by the time they hit my age (25). I use to only know one person who, at my age, still had never been in a relationship. She isn’t even in my immediate sphere, a friend of a friend. However two months ago, when I arrived in Buenos Aires, Kylie casually mentioned in conversation how said person was head-over-heels in love at the moment.

    I am officially last woman standing.

    I like to send my unlucky-in-love self up. Usually I am so busy, and “high on life”, that I can joke about my single status. But there are times, like now, where it does get me down.

    When I am like this, the much lauded eye-sex becomes painful.

    Last night I eyed our gorgeous waiter at dinner. He was wearing a shirt that read, “I [drawing of an insect] Kafka”. But I wasn’t feeling spirited enough to start a conversation. Then as dinner was coming to an end, I spotted him through the window, putting in the earbuds of his iPod and walking home.

    And it made me feel sad.

    What kind of lover is Buenos Aires?

    In blog on March 16, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    I’ve always talked about cities the way I’d talk about lovers. There are some that I’ve just flirted with. Others I fell deeply in love with. Others still that were remote, exotic and mysterious. Some which immediately opened itself to me and I felt we shared a deep connection. And some which I did not get along with at all.

    And what of Buenos Aires? How will I look back on this three month love affair?

    One night a few of us ended up at this incredible milonga, which is a tango club. This milonga puts on a special Thursday night which is more about listening to young bands play very intense, theatrical tango music, rather than see any dance (no one is dancing as the music is performed, and the music is much quicker than usual).

    We were buzzed in through the front door, and came up the stairs that opened up into this run down but atmospheric, old townhouse. There were young people sitting everywhere – and very few were drinking. Instead they sat hushed and cross-legged on the floor, entranced by the band playing some very moving music:

    Click the above picture for my videos of the band.

    We took videos and photos throughout the performances. For us gringos this was a “cultural experience”. But for portenos (the local people of Buenos Aires) – young, and old – this is what people love to do, and they do it until 4 or 5 or onwards in the morning!

    Read the rest of this entry »

    Blindfolded, felt up and poked by a penis

    In blog on March 15, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    On Wednesday we went to a festival called Codigo Pais, the best section of which was dedicated to erotica.

    It was here we joined a line leading to a small space, in which a nutty guy dressed in white told us all to sit down. On the wall was a video of a naked woman being felt up by a man standing behind her. A muscly guy wearing nothing but undies and a big bull mask stood silently in the corner.

    The loco guy began ranting, in Spanish of course so I didn’t understand. A few minutes in a woman stepped out of the shadows, wearing black, lacy nickers and a gauzy shawl around her body and face. She began this extended orgasm, begging people to moleste her, writhing on the floor, and rubbing against a solid wooden chair. Then a woman came out and danced, naked except for a shawl she played with.

    After she left a drag queen came out, and it seemed to mark a new section of the performance. The crazy guy stepped closer to the centre of the room, seemed to search the audience with his eyes and then pointed at me. I looked at Kylie, literally shrugged, and stood up, where I was led to a back entrance from which each performer had emerged. The crazy guy picked eight or nine others from the audience.

    There I was greeted by this woman:

    Who blindfolded me. My heart was racing pretty damn fast at this point. After seeing the performance I felt like just about anything could happen.

    Blindfolded they slowly led me forward through a curtain. Suddenly I felt something sweet on my lips. It tasted like chocolate, so I took a bite – it was a chocolate wafer. Then I felt something wet on my lips – it burned a little. Ah yes, vodka.

    Now hands were rubbing my arms, and caressing my hands, placing them on other bodies. Sometimes I felt a man’s stubble, or the hair on arms. They rubbed up my legs (I was wearing a skirt), and pulled down my singlet top a little. I wondered how far it was going to go.

    I felt a man push his body against me from the back.

    Then I was led further, and the blindfold taken off. Kylie and two friends from Spanish school were gawping at me, asking me what the hell happened in there. Apparently while we had disappeared into the void, the rest of the audience had simply been told to fuck off.

    I never did get to see that space I had been in, or who I had been touching or touching me. And it wasn’t really the point, was it? It wasn’t about a mass orgy or anything like that, it was about each blindfolded participant experiencing a kind of ‘personal erotica’.

    And how fitting considering all my talk of being sexually repressed!

    The people of Buenos Aires would like to say …

    In blog, videos on March 15, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    A little birthday video I made for my friend Catherine.

    The night I almost killed myself

    In blog on March 9, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    The dinner I almost sacrificed my life for

    The other night my Argentine flatmate came home, and upon entering the apartment immediately commented, “mucho calor! (“it’s very hot in here!”) At that point I was chilling on the couch, pretty dozy, and nodded in a non-committal way.

    He walked straight into the kitchen, and exclaimed, “you’ve left the gas on!”

    Suddenly I realised I wasn’t feeling too well.

    As it turned out for the last one and a half hours I had been sitting in a closed up apartment that had been slowly filling with gas. Earlier I’d used the stove while (reluctantly) cooking dinner. I mixed up some of the dials, and somehow had accidentally left one of them with the gas on. And my terrible sense of smell had prevented me from detecting this.

    To think, if my flatmate had returned a few hours later, or not at all that evening, I would have just passed away quietly into the night, with Stephen Colbert’s face the last thing I’d seen.

    That night I ranted to my flatmate about God sending clear messages to me that I should NOT be in the kitchen. But the following morning decided to “get back on that bicycle” and braved using the stove once again.

    When I lit a match to light the stove, a spark flew off and left a burn mark on my chin:


    Just chatting to Rachel on messenger, and realising how ironic it would have been had I actually met my end. Think about it. As everyone knows I’ve avoided cooking my whole life. Then I finally decide I should take it up to improve myself … and instead IT KILLS ME.

    As Rach said, “it could be a new verse in Alanis Morissette’s song.”

    Haciendo Ojitos (Making Eye)

    In blog on March 8, 2009 at 4:00 am

    I just had eye-sex with the most gorgeous guy. He was tall, fit, had dark hair … looked a bit like this. We crossed each other on the street and had the kind of eye-sex that almost felt like touching.

    I’m learning to do that. Turn an eye-pickup into eye-sex. I’m ‘giving it back’ rather than just demurely, and with embarrassment, looking to the ground and pretending I didn’t notice. Usually I’m not comfortable being so forward, but I think Argentina has changed me a little, in that regard.

    I get a lot more attention here, than I do in Sydney. Men are just far more, um, horny? Or at least more expressive about their desire.

    In certain areas, girls should expect to be stared at, their presence triggering kissy noises, or comments made about them, as they walk down the street. And the guys, hanging out of their car windows, or standing idly on the street, young and old, feel no shame about doing this.

    In most cases it is eye-”rape” because I’m in no way interested in the guy. And anyway they don’t actually want you stopping and talking to them. In fact they usually make noises just after you’ve passed, which says to me they want to throw approval onto you, without giving you the opportunity to respond (be that positively or negatively).

    But with some of the cute ones – who don’t usually comment but just shyly smile or make eye as you cross paths on the street – I’ve grown some balls and given a bit of flirtatious eye back.

    This is very unlike me. I’m usually incredibly uncomfortable with my sexuality, to the point where I think it’s becoming unhealthy. It’s been close to four years since I’ve had sex … sex even grosses me out a little, and that isn’t right! Which is why I think it’s good I’m beginning to feel a little bit OK with being thought of as sexy, and being more open about my own feelings.

    So far Buenos Aires has not been the huge pashfest I was hoping it would be. And I find the city’s reputation as a place full of incredibly good-looking men to be a little overrated.

    Nonetheless, with only a third of my time here spent, there’s still plenty of time!

    Unfortunately the only pics I have of some cute guys I’ve spotted are from the back, because I’m too chicken to take them from the front:

    Breakthrough in the Spanish (and cooking!)

    In blog on March 3, 2009 at 6:58 pm

    Like my Spanish, cooking will be more fun once I lose the nerves, and make the experience my own.

    It’s hard to be you, when you can’t speak a language. People have absolutely no idea what you’re like, and in fact, are more likely to assume you’re dumb, or shy. You become this mute, empty presence.

    I have been frustrated with my Spanish because while my classes have been going well, my ability to talk on the street was miles behind. But in these last five days I’ve made some great progress, thanks to two things:

    (1) I have been talking more! I’ve been meeting locals whose English is less than fluent. That means good enough to keep the conversation flowing when I get stuck, but not so good that they wouldn’t rather I speak Spanish when I can.

    (2) Being myself when I talk! Talking isn’t fun when you’re just saying, “Soy Australiana.” “Vivo en Buenos Aires.” “Estudio Espanol“. I love to talk when I get to try and be funny or interesting, and I think loving to talk is going to be fantastic for my Spanish.

    For example, three times I’ve told this story, of why I’m learning to play tennis. I plan to get better and better, and one day end up on the world tour, win a few tournaments, and be introduced to Rafa (Spain’s Rafael Nadal), where we’ll fall desperately in love.

    It is Classic Monica (as it contains unreal expectations of dating an incredibly famous celebrity). And with each telling I have picked up more words, and been able to say more of it in Spanish.*

    Shit! More egg stuck on the saucepan than on the plate. Rookie's mistake.

    Once I understand the principles, I'll be able to get more expressive. And that's when I'll truly be able to enjoy cooking, or speaking Spanish.

    Of course it is still difficult. It’s like trying to build a house with barely any materials (vocabulary) or tools (grammar). But rather than be nervous that I’m sounding like a fool, I have begun to just dive in there, using Spanish words incorrectly but it gets the message across, patching it together with English words where I must, or interrupting with a “Como se dice ‘english word here‘ en espanol?” in order to pick up new words.

    So long as the flow is there, the magic spark stays alive, and I feel like there’s a connection, which is encouraging.

    (Although sometimes I don’t manage to get the message across. Like when a group of us were watching a soccer game on TV, and someone asked me, “te gusta futbol?” (“Do you like soccer?”) “Mas o menos. Veo el mundo taza ayer,” – which means “more or less. I watch the world teacup yesterday,” where I’d meant to say, “I watched the last world cup!”)

    * Today I met this girl in my Spanish class who works in the tennis industry. She gave me the lowdown on Rafa – who apparently has a girlfriend! And they’re very serious!! And him being Catholic and all, he is a serious, family kind of guy!!! Oh noes!!!!!

    Quién sabe?

    In blog on February 28, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    Buenos Aires Fashion Week

    In blog on February 28, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    Kylie was shooting BAFW for work, and suggested I come along. Which sounds more impressive than it is – I bought a general entry ticket at the door for 20 pesos ($10) along with hundreds of suburban, teenage, fashionista wannabes.

    Read the rest of this entry »

    Attacked at midnight!

    In blog on February 28, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    Last Wednesday evening, I flirted with danger.

    I was waiting for Kylie and Paddy on a lit street, next to the bar we were to meet. At midnight, it was not late by Argentine standards, and I regularly saw people passing by.

    In fact one of these passersby stopped and began shouting at me in Spanish, getting right up in my grill. He looked about my age, and smelled bad, perhaps of alcohol. I backed away and repeated, “No entiendo!” (“I don’t understand!”) until he left me alone.

    The ruckus caused some people crossing the road on the other side to look up at me. Now I felt a bit uneasy, texting Kylie to find out how far away they were. But I figured if anything else dodgy happened I could always run into the bar, whose door was wide open and was empty except for one bartender who would surely notice if I came in yelling.

    The thought was almost prophetic.

    Not three minutes later the guy was back and grabbed me by the arms, pushing me further into the walls, pinning me with his body.

    I yelled, “omigod you freak, what the fuck are you doing?” I pushed him with all my might, squeezing out of the corner and running straight into the bar. He tried to hold onto my arm, but I managed to pull away. By the time the bartender and security guard ran out onto the street, the guy was gone.

    Read the rest of this entry »

    Zapatos feo, dulce de leche y medialunas

    In blog on February 25, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    What do you think of my shoes? (No, really).

    When I first saw them in Tokyo I really liked them but thought the removable zip was ugly and had planned to get rid of that part. But then I started thinking that maybe it was kind of cool (ugly but well designed things can be), not to mention makes it easier to put my feet in and out.

    I’m currently in a cafe with WI-FI, sipping té con dulce de leche y frutos rojos. That flavour, “dulce de leche” is insanely popular here. It’s caramelly and sweet, and comes in a thick sauce that people put on toast, but is also a flavour. So far I’ve seen it in chocolate, now tea and on Monday had an icecream “dulce de leche con brownie” in San Telmo:

    Helados, or icecream is so popular here. It’s weird how going to countries like this, or other European or Asian countries where icecream is really popular, makes you forget to have all those guilt pangs about high sugar or fat content, that countries like Australia associate with icecream.

    I’m also eating a medialuna – literally translated as “half moon” – which is also a really popular snack here. They’re kind of like small croissants.

    A heartfelt tribute to an Argentine daughter

    In blog on February 25, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    Translation:
    Patricia Gabriela Knop
    1977 – 16 – 12 – 1997
    You adored friendship.
    You were an example of modesty and humility.
    At 21 years of age you planted seeds of love that continue to grow, living on in our hearts and in the minds of those that knew you.
    We’ll never forget you.
    Your parents and sister.

    With some help from a dictionary and Babelfish! I may not have got it completely right.

    It was quite a moving experience translating this. Slowly unraveling the words, piece by piece, a heartfelt tribute to a daughter who died too young emerged from the cloud of foreign words.

    Quién? Who?

    In blog on February 25, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    Chillin’ with the Buenos Aires dead

    In blog on February 24, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    One of my favourite things to do here in Buenos Aires has been to hang out in the cemetery.

    As morbid as that sounds, if you visited the Recoleta Cemetery you’d understand why:

    Yes believe it or not, each elaborate, marble construction is a grave, or houses an entire family. Some of them even have internal stairs leading to a lower chamber. Kicks Anglo-Saxan graves’ asses!

    Yes this is a grave, not a church!

    I love coming here, sitting on a bench in the shade, and going through my Spanish notes. It’s one of the quietest, cleanest places in the city. And I never feel dumb because there are so many tourists here who speak crap Spanish.

    Ah Aussie backpackers ... you can always spot them a mile away.

    The most popular question asked by tourists is, “where is Evita (Peron’s) grave?” It’s by no means the most extravagant, but I think the only one which is always covered in flowers.

    No I don't know who these people are. There were too many tourists to bother waiting for a shot without them.

    Road trip to Uruguay

    In blog on February 23, 2009 at 11:44 pm

    Kylie has a great write-up on her blog of our recent three day trip to the land across the river.

    More pics:

    Behind Kylie is a corner of rock 'n' roll bars, including La Ronda. We spotted a lot of hip, young Montevideans there.

    Beside La Ronda is Cheesecake Records, which has vinyl and great cheesecake!

    Kylie laps up the sun in Piriapolis

    We totally picked up! This gorgeous, wonderful dog accompanied us through all the holidaying hordes of drunk, horny teenagers in Piriapolis, all the way until we were safely home at our hostel doorstep.

    Icecream at the Argentino Hotel, Piriapolis.

    A gorgeous guy on a poster, in Montevideo. LOL.

    Feminist graffiti on the back of a university toilet door

    In blog on February 23, 2009 at 11:18 pm

    My translation:
    It is the best election
    At least we have something in common
    We women: we know
    What do we want, we are loyal
    What else can we ask for?
    NADA

    With some help from Babelfish and Kylie… cheers!

    And an FYI, Argentina has a female president. Her husband was previously president, making her a sort of Hilary Clinton. And her daughter Florencia made international headlines when it was revealed she had a fotolog. (Remember my post about floggers?)

    Begrudingly becoming a “real person”

    In blog on February 23, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    There are a number of fairly banal but important things that the majority of the human population do, and that I don’t, because I don’t like to. I’m not proud of this list. In fact, I’ve always felt that the fact that I don’t do these things disqualifies me from being able to call myself a “real person”.

    These things are:

    • Eating fruit
    • Playing sport
    • Cooking
    • Driving

    Now if I were to meet a guy who had a similar list, I might very well think he was a bit of a loser. In fact, I’d suspect he isn’t the kind of upstanding, functioning human being that I would ever want to be with, which is kind of a distressing realisation. (As Woody Allen Groucho Marx once said, “I would never want to belong to a club that would have me as a member.”)

    You will be glad to hear that here in Buenos Aires, I am working on three of the four (driving is not currently on the cards).

    Eating fruit: I now eat grapes, grapefruit, all berries, papaya, paw paw, pineapple, kiwi and mango. And not only am I able to eat these fruit, I joyfully want to eat them … I’m SO into the grape scene! But I have yet to tackle the Big 3 (apples, oranges and banana.) Mandarin will never happen, I can tell you that now.

    Playing sport: Kylie and I are taking tennis lessons! I’m not playing too well yet, but I’m actually enjoying it. I think key is that there is strategy involved, so it’s not boring and it’s not a team sport, so I don’t feel all this pressure that I’m letting the side down.

    Cooking:* With assistance from Kylie, who is an excellent cook, I am slowly becoming more comfortable in the kitchen. I cannot yet say that I enjoy cooking – and perhaps I never will. Which is a shame because I really enjoy eating.

    I think my inability to really enjoy the act of cooking, is similar to my inability to really enjoy learning a language (in both cases I do it for the end result, rather than the process.) Both feel mechanical – follow instructions, memorise rules. Any suggestions with how I can turn both into something creative, and therefore fun?

    Some of the meals that have come out of our kitchen:

    White chocolate Chelsea buns

    Chicken and capsicum

    Ribs in plum sauce

    Beef and salad

    Unless chocolate souffles are meant to taste flabby, and not very chocolately, I don't think I nailed these.

    * In one of my recent Spanish classes, my Argentine teacher was having trouble remembering the English words for certain vegetables. She would draw a picture of it on the board so I could work out the English word. For too many I would shrug, equally clueless. Eventually she laughed and guessed, correctly, “you don’t cook, do you?”

    Buenos Aires, the good life #1

    In blog on February 19, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    Took that hot dress from DAM in Palermo, Buenos Aires, for a spin.

    Buck's night Argentina style. By the time we came out of the theatre an hour later one of the naked boys had his head in the gutter, puking.

    Kylie in front of the Floralis Generica.

    The T-shirt I bought from the Twestival party. Will forevermore be one of my prized possessions.

    Me drinking mate, a traditional Argentine drink of the gauchos (cowboys.) It tastes like bitter hay, drunk out of a metal straw and shared with friends.

    I like hanging out at parks and plazas. This was in front of a medical university on calle de Junin.

    A pretty rad looking sunglasses store in Palermo.

    The Argentine flag flying in plaza de San Martin.

    The tango being performed on calle de Florida. Phwoar, sexy!

    Palacio de Congreso Nacional.

    A local map, hot chocolate and breakfast!

    Lo siento, Buenos Aires (I’m sorry, Buenos Aires)

    In blog on February 16, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    Kylie took me to this excellent one-man show. Well I think it was excellent. I didn't understand most of what he was saying.

    It’s hard not to become disheartened when you’re in a country whose language you don’t speak.

    How can you feel like anything but a complete and utter asshole, when the first thing you have to say to the mobile phone salesperson is, “hablas ingles?” To which they might respond with a dismissive wave of the hand, a roll of their eyes, or at the very least a little sigh escapes their lips.

    And even when they can respond, usually in perfect English, “yes, I can speak a little”, there is now that feeling that you’re even more of a dumb schmuck in the face of their impressive bilingual skills.

    And you ARE a dumb schmuck. You’re the ignorant, English-speaking, colonialist-slash-capitalist who expects to just stride into someone else’s country and demand they speak your native tongue!

    I despair and want to explain that I am trying. That I’m in Buenos Aires to study Spanish, and I’ve only been here a week. But of course, I don’t know enough Spanish to say so.*

    The only Chinese people I've seen here in Buenos Aires are the ones that go to my university. Apparently there is a special exchange program with China, so the university has a lot of Chinese students. One came up to me this morning and spoke to me in Chinese, and then Spanish, neither of which I understood. Which just goes to show Spanish is not the only language I am incompetent at.

    One doesn’t get points for trying. You either speak Spanish, or you speak it badly. And unless you’re a local you’re probably speaking it badly. I mean hey, kids are speaking better Spanish than you. Total morons are speaking better Spanish than you. In fact everyone is speaking Spanish better than you (except for a few of those other dickhead foreigners).

    Speaking Spanish is like breathing, eating or walking for them. It comes naturally. Just as English does for you. But still you can’t help but feel like every person in the whole damn Spanish-speaking world must be a genius for remembering all the verbos reflexive, and not having to think before pluralisaing all the words of a sentence.

    The Argentine people are very patient and accommodating of my frustratingly poor speaking skills. (Much friendlier than certain Western European countries). And I completely understand why anyone would be frustrated with me. I would be frustrated with me too.

    There is just one thought that keeps me going … it can only get better from here!

    * (Often I do know how to say so, it just takes me ages to remember. In the meanwhile I am filling in the painful minutes with, “ah, um, puedo, no wait, estudiar, hangon no that’s not it,” and the way they’re looking at me like I’m soft in the head is making me panic and forget everything. Plus they often have trouble understanding my poor pronunciation anyway.)

    Last Night’s Party: Twestival at Buenos Aires

    In blog on February 13, 2009 at 8:18 pm

    Kylie and I headed to the Twestival party in Puerto Madero, Buenos Aires last night. Twestival was a global event held simultaneously by Twitter fans in over 175 cities, raising money to dig wells in Africa. I mainly wanted to go so I could scope out the who’s who of the B.A. blogger scene, but knowing the money from the T-shirt I bought went to a good cause was an added bonus.

    We met some fine folks that evening. That’s what I love about technology people. They’re usually not dickheads, they’re pretty intelligent, have a sharp sense of humour, often driven to do ‘good’, and do it creatively, and particularly of the bloggers, friendly and eloquent. And whether you’re a web geek from Sydney, New York, Buenos Aires or Beijing, we occupy a shared space – that wonderful, wonderful world called the internet. So we speak the same language (even when we don’t, actually, speak the same language).

    In true Julia Allison style, I managed to snap a picture of me and three big guns in the Buenos Aires blogging scene (these guys are in the 5000+ hits a day ballpark).

    I’ve forgotten the first guy’s name, I’ll get back to you on that one. But to First is Juan Pablo, then my immediate left is Pablo Sanchez of Unblogged (a blog about nothing, inspired by Seinfeld), and to my right is Conz Preti of Butanoblog. I’m holding up one of the prizes from the raffle, a signed picture featuring Conz, another blogger and three models.

    Conz was telling me about a fascinating phenomenon here in Argentina, called “floggers”. It’s a teenage subculture that rivals emos (in fact they hate each other). Floggers keep photo-blogs, at Fotolog.com, dress in bright colours, have asymmetrical fringes, all claim to be bisexual, and people really hate them!

    Here’s a rather amusing Wikipedia entry on the subject:

    Flogger is a teenager fashion originated in Argentina at the end of 2003, which is closely related to Fotolog, a photoblog web site. Emerged from the glam fashion, and merged with elements of several other styles, it has become very popular among young people, to almost become a craze. The style is principally composed of tight trousers on males and females alike, broad V-neck T-shirts, fluorescent colors, canvas sneakers or skate shoes, long fringe brushed to one side of the face or over one eye, straight hair and horn-rimmed glasses. It is common to call “floggers” to any adolescent followers of this style.

    This fashion has also developed a particular way of dancing electro house and techno music, called Electro – although this term already had the same meaning it has in English in reference to the electronic music in general. The moves, related to the French tecktonik and the Australian shuffle, consist of rapidly spreading one leg, hitting the floor with the heel, and drawing the other leg backwards, and then quickly changing the position of the legs (spreading the other leg, and shifting backwards the one that was spread).

    And an expanded version at this blogger’s write-up on the differences between floggers and emos, and which has pics. According to Conz this girl is one of the more famous flogger (perhaps micro-famous is a better term), and it’s even led to corporate sponsorship! I wonder where “scene kids” fit into this mega awesome picture.

    Colo the dog is lost!

    In blog on February 13, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    My translation: LOST. “Colo” was lost at the Saavedra Park on 01/01/09. He’s big in size, reddish, brown and black in colour, and fourteen years old. He has a red collar from Fauna Town. If you see him, please catch him (he’s very docile). Call us and we’ll come to pick him up. Please communicate any information that you can to Colo’s family! 154-028-0330 or 4545-8068. Thanks!

    With some help from a dictionary and Kylie… cheers!

    Bucks missing in Argentina?

    In blog on February 11, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    Same, same

    If there’s one thing I know, it’s cities. I’ve had the privilege of planting my feet on so many pavements around the world.

    And there are many things that cities, particularly world cities share in common; Skyscrapers, subways, traffic, central parks, bustling financial districts, bohemian neighbourhoods, ghettos, aiports, fine food, fine clothes, fine men.

    And one of the most common of common attributes must be the presence of international brands. And out of all the pervasive international brands, there is one that is king, which is to say you can find it in almost all world cities.

    I’m talking, of course, about Starbucks.

    So I did, actually, take note while I was walking around Buenos Aires’ central district that the usually omnipresent coffee house was nowhere to be seen. (There was a popular chain coffee house called Habana, however).

    But why did it not suprise me that when I visited Palermo, which has muchos turistas, I saw this:

    Despite their recent global downsizing, Starbucks has found its way to Argentina – opening soon.

    But different

    But what makes a world city such a pleasure to visit is not the similarities, but the differences. And Buenos Aires has a rather unique problem which I’ve never encountered elsewhere.

    They have a shortage of moneda. That is, coins!

    Apparently the mafia hold on to a lot of the coins so as to control inflation. Amazing that the mafia can have such a major influence on the economy – an indication of corruption in the government.

    A lack of coinage leads to a few, let’s say, unique local practises. For example, taxi drivers would rather charge you less, than have to give you coin change. You can’t catch the bus because you have to have coins to pay for your fare. People would rather, or must, wait in the long line at the metro ticket office, rather than go to the short line which requires you pay the exact fare … only to find the office closes up anyway and let’s everyone travel for free because they’ve run out of change.

    I can speak Spanish? And an unexpected Argentine kiss

    In blog on February 11, 2009 at 12:02 am

    The shop assistant

    On Monday I wandered around Palermo, a sort of Surry Hills/ Paddington of Buenos Aires: pretty tree-lined streets of boutique shops, cafes and bars. The fashion here is all about bright, loud colours, and that’s not really my style. But it was fun to pop into the shops what with their stunning interior decorating, and cute gardens out the back.

    There was one shop I did like though, called DAM, where I spotted a dress that inspired an instant “I must have it” reaction. I asked the sales assistant, “aqui?” (here?) pointing to the change room. I can’t say anything as sophisticated as “do I change here?” She smiled, nodded and let me go in.

    While I was changing I overheard a couple of Australian accents discussing dresses, and as it turned out they didn’t speak a word of Spanish so the assistant had to speak to them in English. I came out and did the (what I think is the) obligatory introduction. The two Australian girls – glamorous, leggy blondes, showy and fashionable – were spending a few days in Buenos Aires before heading to Carnavale in Rio.

    I went to the assistant to pay for the dress. She asked me a question in Spanish, which I didn’t understand, so she repeated it in English, “are you here on holidays?” “Ah, no, estudiar espanol,” I stuttered. As we talked she patiently asked her questions in Spanish, gently pushing the conversation forwards with a translation when I didn’t understand, and me crudely throwing down misshapen Spanish phrases where I could.

    I wasn’t good, but at least I was saying something, and imagine how I felt when, by the end, she said, “well it’s great you can already speak a bit!” WHAT?! You think I can speak Spanish? Omg, omg, omg, RU for real?

    And the feeling was heightened by the presence of the other two Aussies who couldn’t say anything. It’s the first time I’ve ever felt like I could speak a language (other than English) better than someone else!

    The homeless guy

    But I think overall my time here in Buenos Aires has made me aware of just how little Spanish I speak and just how much work I have to do before I can come close to really being able to claim that, “hablo espanol.” Later that day I was tested again, this time by someone who spoke no English which made things much more difficult.

    I was sitting on a park bench listening to a Michel Thomas Spanish language CD when a big, hulking homeless guy, blackened with grime, came over miming smoking a cigarette. I told him, “no tengo”, then he followed up with a mime asking for the time. Since when did homeless guys have appointments to keep? I pulled out my mobile to check. Telling the time is like Languages 101, so I was pretty excited to get the chance to test my number skills.

    It was 7:50pm, and like many countries Argentina goes by 24 hour clock. Usually I’m pretty good at making the conversion, but all my nerves re: speaking Spanish meant I completely blanked out. “Siete, cincuenta” (7, 50) I blurted.

    The homeless guy decided to settle down on the bench next to me and I struggled through a few questions, where are you from, where do you live, etc. etc. but quickly we reached the limit of my knowledge. With his big, white, bushy beard, round belly and thick lips he looked a bit like Santa. If Santa hadn’t washed for years, and was missing one eye.

    I got up to leave, but offered my hand and a “mucho gusto” (nice to meet you). He thanked me by going in for a kiss on the cheek – I couldn’t help but grimace a little as that dirty tangle of beard enveloped my vision – but smiled, and was soon on my way home.

    Steak porn

    In blog on February 8, 2009 at 2:30 am

    Great carne from La Cabrera, Buenos Aires.

    You know those dudes holding up signs with people’s names at the airport?

    In blog on February 8, 2009 at 1:13 am

    Well this time, coming through the gate of the Buenos Aires airport, I saw my name on one of those signs! Sweet! My mate Kylie, who lives here in Buenos Aires, was kind enough to send a reliable taxi driver over to take me from the airport to her place.

    IMG_1846[1]

    This is a recreation we made after reaching our destination. The driver, Leon, was super kind enough to oblige as I didn’t want to attack him with a camera after first seeing him at the airport. Ah, the bizarre things a blogger has to do …

    I don’t want to write too much about Beunos Aires yet, as I don’t think two days is really enough time to gather any concrete understanding. But first impressions are that it’s a blend of vivacious, South American culture, with the graceful beauty of a big, cosmopolitan European city.

    On Friday I took an extensive walk of the city centre (microcentro) but didn’t really see any “sights”. I asked Kylie about what I should see, as the Lonely Planet didn’t offer too much, but she said this isn’t really a sightseeing city, it’s more about eating, drinking, hanging out with friends, etc. … city life.

    I was kind of relieved, because I’m not really in the mood to play tourist. So that means finding a place to stay, working out my favourite cafe (with free WI-FI hopefully!), attending Spanish classes, eating juicy steaks with fruity red wines, and maybe macking on some Argentine boys!